Whenever a new law is being proposed the only reasonable metric for its
affect is to ask, 'how could this be abused' or 'how could this be used by
someone wanting to lock me up/shut me down/persecute me'.
Government agencies have a long long history of stretching laws far beyond
the intention of their writers and the plain English reading of the law
and will interpret them in often tortured ways to accomplish what they
want. Often the most pessimistic of critics turns out to have been
horribly optimistic about the affects.
The idea that we should turn food safety over to an agency that wants to
ban raw milk production and has fought against food producers making valid
health claims about their foods (as it competes with pharmaceuticals) was
insane from the beginning.
We had another problem when this law was going through Congress in that
dirty politics was being used to undermine the opposition and set up fake
opposition which predictably caved. A number of the so called consumer
protection groups do not disclose their funding sources.
Unfortunately the tendency of the left to see corporations as evil and
government as the solution to protect us fails to understand that
government is often simply the puppet of those same corporations.
Pete
>> moringse <mailto:
mori...@gmail.com>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "KPC-Dev" group.
> ~
> To post to this group, send email to
kpc...@googlegroups.com
> ~
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
kpc-dev+u...@googlegroups.com
> ~
> For more options, visit this group at
>
http://groups.google.com/group/kpc-dev?hl=en?hl=en
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "KPC-Dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to
kpc-dev+u...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>