Just scribbling down my thoughts from our brief 10-15min discussion on this subject on video chat last week.
Problem: Numerous times we (collectively and individually) are being misrepresented. Perhaps some of this is our fault for "sharing" too much of the history (trash, politics or whatever else you call it) with one another *especially* newer members. What is "heard" is often not what we feel, or would actually act upon.
Example statement: John Smith has done this so many times before. Let me tell you about his 6 forum bans, and constant attacks. I refuse to work with him.
What is "heard": The CLT hates John Smith and refuses to work with him. Therefore I (new CLT member) am at odds with the CLT and am going to have a difficult time handling this issue as I talk to John Smith all the time, we're good friends. I'm going to have a hard time on the CLT with this attitude towards John Smith, my friend, hanging constantly hanging over my work with him and my work with the CLT.
Result: While some individuals on the CLT may individually have an issue with John Smith, that may not in any way mean that the CLT would prevent John Smith from working with CLT members or even on the Joomla project. However, that is not the *message* that new CLT member #42 heard, or is acting under the assumption of.
Suggestions:
- We can be more careful about discussing history with new CLT members. For example, do we even need to mention John Smith's history unless new CLT member #42 is asking about voting them on to the CLT? Even then, do we have to bring it all up?
- Can we use this period of adding new people to the CLT to clear the slate with differences and opinions we have of one another past actions and feelings towards us and people who we may associate with.
- Perhaps new CLT members can be encouraged to "listen" for a few months rather than feel compelled to jump in to CLT discussions. ie perhaps they can be like (I say like in a very loose way) non-voting members for a time, as they learn how things work etc
Random Rambling: I have noted that a few of us on the CLT have tended to become more focussed on one area of the project or another. While others on the CLT like me, for example, have had the exact opposite happen. I think this has happened without us knowing it. I think it's a good thing, and we can perhaps use to this to realize that for example CLT members #42 may not be that concerned with for example what Matt is doing on the JED. Perhaps internally we're moving towards a small structure where CLT members all working together, but respecting that each of us may have quite a different focus, or even reason for being involved. Can we embrace this and leave certain issues to one who have a specific focus in them.. ie JED and conversely, issues of a more general nature more to other CLT members?
Your thoughts, opinions etc.. I know there were some other excellent contributions to this part of our discussion.
PS, while others who work in the Community Workgroup have access to post to this thread, it might be best to allow only CLT members to reply, at least initially.
Thanks
--
Brad Baker