1) offline modus:
Here I get the following error message:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin:0.6.2.201302030002:instrument (default)
on project com.fugro.gwf.server.core: Execution default of goal org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin:0.6.2.201302030002:instrument failed:
Missing or invalid stackmap frames. -> [Help 1]
2) on the fly modus:
Running com.fugro.gwf.server.core.synchronisation.Synchronise1Test
Start java.lang.instrument.IllegalClassFormatException:
Error while instrumenting class com/fugro/gwf/server/core/referencing/ReferencingAspect.
Underneath this message the stack trace once more shows:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Missing or invalid stackmap frames.
My questions:
1) Is there a way to get coverage information for an aspectj project in JaCoCo?
2) If not, do you know an alternative tool that can deal with aspectj projects. I tried clover, but they simply say they don't support aspectj projects. I also tried Coburtera and emma, but assumed JaCoCo is a more recent (and better supported) tool
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jacoco/Zb_MOFXIUn0/unsubscribe?hl=en.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to jacoco+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jacoco+un...@googlegroups.com.
André.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jacoco/Zb_MOFXIUn0/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to jacoco+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Works for me, thanks!
BTW there was this comment there: "I notice you mentioning Java 1.6 where stack maps are *actually* optional, so JaCoCo strictly requiring them is a little overzealous"