jeremyshaw
unread,Dec 18, 2008, 10:46:45 PM12/18/08Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to INTEL 9XX Gaming
5-25 = barely playable. You WILL see lots of jerkng, but I played
through Halo's campain on a 815 "extreme edition" (see, I still have
my sanity) with roughly 10-20 fps. (btw, EAW (no FOC (these are star
wars games, btw)) will work on the 815).
Back on topic: you cannot play multiplayer with those framerates.
Some people are network lag fragged, you would be killed by gfx lag
(lol).
COD4, 5 fps... Think of it this way, the human eye processes at
~25fps, so most movies are at 24 fps... if it goes any slower, you get
the feeling of "jitteryness"
Crysis... dunno about framerates here, but probably wouldn't get far
past menu.
Fallout 3: There is a promising project on the oldblivion (yes, that's
right) forums called (unofficialy, even for the community devs)
"fallback 3" just look fo it on those forums.
Fallout 3 won't load AT ALL by default, so, you need a SM2.0 hack...
hence fallback 3.
Good luck (even a REALLY bad, cheap, 49USD nvidia 9500 would whoop
intel's most powerful gpu-the 4500mhd. Even just via pure shader core
count, it wins (but that doesn't matter, a 8500gt with 8 cores is
still better than all 10 of the 4500's cores).
So......
.......
......
Intel has rsponded by beginning to develop the "next gen" platform for
gfx that is supposed to be on par with nVidia and ATI.... in 3-5
years!
Now you know.