Suresh Rana--
Thanks, Chadwell ji
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
Some earlier relevant feedback:
| I am confused by this. It certainly appears to be an Androsace rather than a Primula. I can say with confidence that it is not Androsace mucronifolia - in fact the plant from VOF is not remotely similar to A.mucronifolia. This species is only recorded from Aghanistan to Kashmir, so would not be expected in VOF anyhow. |
The image does seem to match the posting named as Androsace garhwalica (Primula garhwalica). I am not familiar with this species. Clearly it has been named by Indian botanists. Could someone tell me the publication this species was described in and how it is distinguished from related species? -- From Chris Chadwell ji.
|
|
See more discussions in another thread at VOF Week: : Androsace mucronifolia? en-route Hemkund sahib |
|
|
--
'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia.
For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia website (with a species database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of India'.
To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; chrischadwell261@btinternet.com; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups. com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; chrischadwell261@btinternet. com; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>
To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups. com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; chrischadwell261@btinternet. com; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>
Thanks, Chadwell ji
Thought best to collect my thoughts before responding further.The problem with the links provided (and most from specialist nurseries, growers and the like) is that such people (in good faith mostly - though it is in the commercial interest of nurseries to list as many different species & cultivars as possible, as there are collectors of all available examples of favoured genera e.g. Androsace, Primula, Iris, Meconopsis, Geranium etc.). They will buy if the species name or cultivar name is different to what they already have (or think they have).The problem is that hardly any of those running nurseries, websites (even the top horticulturists in the UK) have any proper training in how to identify plants - to be fair, often few, if any reference books or other resources exist. They rely on the name something arrived at.The result is, as my own informal research suggests, a high proportion of plants are misidentified in cultivation (just as a significant proportion of plants seen during surveys and trips to the Himalaya are misidentified). For plants under names of species found in the Himalaya (some plants grow in the Himalaya and other regions of the world, so the example may not have originated in the Himalaya) I judge at least 50% to be misidentified (and I do not mean because they are hybrids, another complication in cultivation) - I have checked plants from nurseries and sources of seed, commercial and botanic garden index semina.Thus, we cannot expect the situation with Androsace in cultivation to be any different.Of the links provided, the final two do not come close to the others and in my opinion are not Androsace globifera.As to the identity of the plant photographed in VoF - this, as I have already stated is definitely not A.mucronifolia. It might be A,globifera but some sources say it should have flower-stalks (others like 'Flowers of Himalaya' say short-stalked or stalkless. It is the most likely candidate.There has long been confusion with the mat and cushion-forming species.Interestingly, the image of A,globifera in 'Flowers of the Himalaya' shows flowers with darker central parts, as does the much larger photo of this species in 'Portraits of Himalayan Flowers' (T.Yoshida), along with one of the images in his 'Himalayan Plants Illustrated'.
To: C CHADWELL <chrischadwell261@btinternet.com>
Cc: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 18 November 2016, 4:49
Subject: Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:256943] VoF Week: Primulaceae - Androsace mucronifolia Watt
Thanks, Chadwell ji.To me it appears close to Androsace globifera as per the following images (though I may or may not be correct):