This Primula also shot in Munsyari area Uttarakhand resembles to Primula petiolaris Wallich with its irregularly toothed petals.
Validation (or otherwise) is requested.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Thanks, Chadwell ji
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia.
For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia website (with a species database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of India'.
Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji, for looking at all posts in this genera in efi.Catalogue of life states Primula petiolaris Wall. to be an accepted name.May I request Rawat ji to pl. post other images.
Wonderful images, Rawat ji
Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji, for looking at all posts in this genera in efi.Catalogue of life states Primula petiolaris Wall. to be an accepted name.May I request Rawat ji to pl. post other images.
Thanks, Chadwell ji
Thanks for sending additional images. I will quote further from 'Primula' which states that few species have been so misunderstoodas Primula petiolaris. As the earliest described species in the section it was used as a dustbin during the 19th century, most petiolarids being assigned to it. As the section became better understood, most of these were split off but so few specimens of the type plant existed that they were misinterpreted.Unfortunately, Wallich's type specimen was collected in the summer with a few off-season flowers, so it has summer leaves with long petioles untypical of the usual flowering conditions (hence the name of this species, and indeed the section). Further it was not realized that flowers of pink petiolarids dry blue. Many 19th Century pressed specimens had few, if any field notes - a situation which, regrettably has continued with too many Indian botanists gathering scrappy, often poor pressed specimens and almost no field notes (such as flower colour) tomake attempts to reliable identify more difficult to name primulas (and other genera) that much harder (to impossible).Anyhow, according to Richards the plant photographed above Munsyari is not P.petiolaris. It is a shame that the calyces photographed are not in focus. They are supposed to be tightly clasps, blunter lobes. There is a total absence of meal plus cup-shaped flowers, tight, crisped rosette at flowering with almost stem-less flowers. It is also smaller.The authors of Flora of Bhutan speak of differences between forms of P.petiolaris in Bhutan and those in Nepal. It may well be forms in Uttarkhand are somewhat different as well, so their comments as to Bhutanese and Sikkimese specimens might not apply further West?IF this plant is P.gracilipes then it has not been recorded from what was Kumaon previously. As the differences have been so poorly understood, the old records are probably somewhat meaningless and few in number.As Richards thinks P.gracilipes could be considered a subspecies of P.petiolaris, his opinion, should, for the present, rank the highest. It would be helpful if someone could forward these images and accompanying information to him, for his thoughts.In the mean time, how about calling these plants Primula petiolaris sensu lato or Primula petiolaris subspecies gracilipes? Or Primula sp. aff. petiolaris? This indicates the uncertainty.If group members can send in more good-quality images of petiolarids (and all other primulas for that making) with close-up, in focus images of flowers (upper and lower surface of petals, sepals, stalks, upper and lower leaf surfaces) plus good field notes, then this will help us clarify the situation.Without more images showing all the necessary characteristics of a number of other collections, it is impossible to add much to the uncertainty which seems to remain.So, I hope group members are inspired to get up into the mountains to look for Primulas - in the case of the petiolarids, they are not found at extreme altitudes or terrain, so most members should be able to undertake the required treks/walks.Look forward to lots of Primula images in 2017.
To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>
Cc: chrischadwell261@btinternet.com; drdsrawat...@gmail.com
Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
Some earlier relevant feedback:
Thanks for sending additional images. I will quote further from 'Primula' which states that few species have been so misunderstood as Primula petiolaris. As the earliest described species in the section it was used as a dustbin during the 19th century, most petiolarids being assigned to it. As the section became better understood, most of these were split off but so few specimens of the type plant existed that they were misinterpreted. |
Unfortunately, Wallich's type specimen was collected in the summer with a few off-season flowers, so it has summer leaves with long petioles untypical of the usual flowering conditions (hence the name of this species, and indeed the section). Further it was not realized that flowers of pink petiolarids dry blue. Many 19th Century pressed specimens had few, if any field notes - a situation which, regrettably has continued with too many Indian botanists gathering scrappy, often poor pressed specimens and almost no field notes (such as flower colour) to make attempts to reliable identify more difficult to name primulas (and other genera) that much harder (to impossible). Anyhow, according to Richards the plant photographed above Munsyari is not P.petiolaris. It is a shame that the calyces photographed are not in focus. They are supposed to be tightly clasps, blunter lobes. There is a total absence of meal plus cup-shaped flowers, tight, crisped rosette at flowering with almost stem-less flowers. It is also smaller. The authors of Flora of Bhutan speak of differences between forms of P.petiolaris in Bhutan and those in Nepal. It may well be forms in Uttarkhand are somewhat different as well, so their comments as to Bhutanese and Sikkimese specimens might not apply further West? IF this plant is P.gracilipes then it has not been recorded from what was Kumaon previously. As the differences have been so poorly understood, the old records are probably somewhat meaningless and few in number. As Richards thinks P.gracilipes could be considered a subspecies of P.petiolaris, his opinion, should, for the present, rank the highest. It would be helpful if someone could forward these images and accompanying information to him, for his thoughts. In the mean time, how about calling these plants Primula petiolaris sensu lato or Primula petiolaris subspecies gracilipes? Or Primula sp. aff. petiolaris? This indicates the uncertainty. If group members can send in more good-quality images of petiolarids (and all other primulas for that making) with close-up, in focus images of flowers (upper and lower surface of petals, sepals, stalks, upper and lower leaf surfaces) plus good field notes, then this will help us clarify the situation. Without more images showing all the necessary characteristics of a number of other collections, it is impossible to add much to the uncertainty which seems to remain. So, I hope group members are inspired to get up into the mountains to look for Primulas - in the case of the petiolarids, they are not found at extreme altitudes or terrain, so most members should be able to undertake the required treks/walks. Look forward to lots of Primula images in 2017. Best Wishes, Chris Chadwell |
Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji, for looking at all posts in this genera in efi.Catalogue of life states Primula petiolaris Wall. to be an accepted name.May I request Rawat ji to pl. post other images.
It is so helpful to receive input from those with the maximum knowledge/familiarity with a genus, especiallyfor examples we have been uncertain about.Naturally, it is of special interest to members of this group, when a species, subspecies or variety has their rangeextended into Indian territory or recognised only in Indian territory.As far as I know, Richards 'determination' (not sure if he would count it as such) for this plant from Munsyari means thisrepresents the first record of Primula boothii in Uttarakhand, as is the case for Primula gracilipes from Gori Valley.
Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji.It is all because you requested that we take his opinion in this matter.
On 9 December 2016 at 22:21, C CHADWELL <chrischadwell261@btinternet.com> wrote:
It is so helpful to receive input from those with the maximum knowledge/familiarity with a genus, especiallyfor examples we have been uncertain about.Naturally, it is of special interest to members of this group, when a species, subspecies or variety has their rangeextended into Indian territory or recognised only in Indian territory.As far as I know, Richards 'determination' (not sure if he would count it as such) for this plant from Munsyari means thisrepresents the first record of Primula boothii in Uttarakhand, as is the case for Primula gracilipes from Gori Valley.
Thanks, Rawat ji
Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji.It is all because you requested that we take his opinion in this matter.
Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji.It is all because you requested that we take his opinion in this matter.
It is so helpful to receive input from those with the maximum knowledge/familiarity with a genus, especiallyfor examples we have been uncertain about.Naturally, it is of special interest to members of this group, when a species, subspecies or variety has their rangeextended into Indian territory or recognised only in Indian territory.As far as I know, Richards 'determination' (not sure if he would count it as such) for this plant from Munsyari means thisrepresents the first record of Primula boothii in Uttarakhand, as is the case for Primula gracilipes from Gori Valley.
It is so helpful to receive input from those with the maximum knowledge/familiarity with a genus, especiallyfor examples we have been uncertain about.Naturally, it is of special interest to members of this group, when a species, subspecies or variety has their rangeextended into Indian territory or recognised only in Indian territory.As far as I know, Richards 'determination' (not sure if he would count it as such) for this plant from Munsyari means thisrepresents the first record of Primula boothii in Uttarakhand, as is the case for Primula gracilipes from Gori Valley.
Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji, for great inputs for members like me.
Cc: C CHADWELL <chrischadwell261@btinternet.com>; efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>; Satish Phadke <drsmp...@gmail.com>
Cc: C CHADWELL <chrischadwell261@btinternet. com>; efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups. com>; Satish Phadke <drsmp...@gmail.com>