Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please.
Some earlier relevant feedback:
"It may be Prumula sessilis. Krishan Lal"
|
Some earlier relevant feedback:
"It may be Primula sessilis. Krishan Lal"
| |
Thanks, Chadwell ji
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
Some earlier relevant feedback:
It may be Primula sessilis. Krishan Lal
|
This is very strange... it cant be Primula sessilis as in sessilis petals will have pointed tips but here they are blunt two lobes. It looks like deformed form of Primula denticulata but thats a wild guess. I might be missing something.... Regards Pankaj
|
Would you be kind enough to tell me the altitudes of the TWO different species you have posted images of? The FIRST (7 images) which you say was near a water source is clearly different fro the SECOND (the final two images); do you possibly have any additional images of the latter. |
Neither are close to Primula denticulata nor Primula vulgaris - which is not a native of the Himalaya. Knowing the different altitudes (the habitats are clearly very different) will help my efforts to identify them. Would you also supply approximate dates of flowering? |
Chris Chadwell
|
|
--
'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia.
For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia website (with a species database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
Dear Dr SinghMy request for altitudes where the two sets of photos were taken has not been answered.Am I correct that the last two images are not from the same plant?I am willing to take a further look but need some input from you to help narrow down theoptions nor waste time - that would not be fair on me.
Cc: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>; chrischadwell261@btinternet.com; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Nidhan Singh <nidhans...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 22 November 2016, 20:13
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:140534] Gori Valley Tour: Primula for identification..
Pankaj, I agree with your direction on this. The pedicels are too long for P. denticulata or P. erosa (thus your suggestion of deformed). The whole plant looks like it could belong in the Petiolares Section, but that doesn't fit with the last two detailed images showing farinose pedicels and emarginate corolla lobe shape.I will have to think more on this, but I would welcome more suggestions.Pam
From: "J.M. Garg" <jmg...@gmail.com>
To: "efloraofindia" <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>
Cc: chrischadwell261@btinternet.com, "Dr. Pankaj Kumar" <sahani...@gmail.com>, "Nidhan Singh" <nidhans...@gmail.com>
Dear Dr SinghMy request for altitudes where the two sets of photos were taken has not been answered.Am I correct that the last two images are not from the same plant?I am willing to take a further look but need some input from you to help narrow down theoptions nor waste time - that would not be fair on me.
Cc: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups. com>; chrischadwell261@btinternet. com; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Nidhan Singh <nidhans...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 22 November 2016, 20:13
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:140534] Gori Valley Tour: Primula for identification..
Pankaj, I agree with your direction on this. The pedicels are too long for P. denticulata or P. erosa (thus your suggestion of deformed). The whole plant looks like it could belong in the Petiolares Section, but that doesn't fit with the last two detailed images showing farinose pedicels and emarginate corolla lobe shape.I will have to think more on this, but I would welcome more suggestions.Pam
Cc: chrischadwell261@btinternet. com, "Dr. Pankaj Kumar" <sahani...@gmail.com>, "Nidhan Singh" <nidhans...@gmail.com>
Thanks, Pam ji
Thanks, Chadwell ji
To: C CHADWELL <chrischadwell261@btinternet.com>
Cc: Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Craig & Pam Eveleigh <evel...@shaw.ca>; J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>; efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 23 November 2016, 1:51
Subject: Re: Gori Valley Tour: Primula for identification..
Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
Some earlier relevant feedback:
It may be Prumula sessilis. Krishan Lal
|
This is very strange... it cant be Primula sessilis as in sessilis petals will have pointed tips but here they are blunt two lobes. It looks like deformed form of Primula denticulata but thats a wild guess. I might be missing something.... Regards Pankaj
|
Would you be kind enough to tell me the altitudes of the TWO different species you have posted images of? The FIRST (7 images) which you say was near a water source is clearly different fro the SECOND (the final two images); do you possibly have any additional images of the latter. Neither are close to Primula denticulata nor Primula vulgaris - which is not a native of the Himalaya. |
Knowing the different altitudes (the habitats are clearly very different) will help my efforts to identify them. Would you also supply approximate dates of flowering? - Chadwell ji
|
My request for altitudes where the two sets of photos were taken has not been answered. Am I correct that the last two images are not from the same plant? I am willing to take a further look but need some input from you to help narrow down the options nor waste time - that would not be fair on me. Best Wishes, Chris Chadwell
|
I noticed, the time on the photographs are matching for all pics, but just incase the individuals are differrent. Thanks and regards Pankaj
|
OK but what is the approximate altitude and what do you mean by a water source? |
Can you describe the habitat please? Best Wishes, Chris Chadwell |
|
I am sorry to delay the matter, I have two submissions: |
1. The altitude of the place was around 1500-1800 m, and the pics do all belong to one taxon only (may be more than one individuals). The differences are due to two different cameras. The place, locality and time is same. 2. The habitat was a small seasonal stream, on exposed slope. The water just enough to keep a few meters wet and dripping. |
I will be happy to know your valued opinions, thanks for all your efforts. |
Nidhan Singh
|
Pankaj, I agree with your direction on this. The pedicels are too long for P. denticulata or P. erosa (thus your suggestion of deformed). The whole plant looks like it could belong in the Petiolares Section, but that doesn't fit with the last two detailed images showing farinose pedicels and emarginate corolla lobe shape. I will have to think more on this, but I would welcome more suggestions. Pam
|
This really is proving to be a mystery! Not that many Primulas are known from Uttarakhand and none |
seem to fit the plant you have photographed. Mind you, I cannot think what it is. Perhaps someone can forward the images to Professor Richards for his thoughts? Could it be something special? Late flowering, low- elevation, seemingly contradictory characteristics..... I agree with the thoughts of Pam Eveleigh. The foliage and habit of the first images suggest must be a Petiolarid yet the last two images contradict this. You have assured me the last two images are from the same population - though I can be forgiven for thinking they might have been from a different species as the pedicels are much longer and the leaf shape different (much narrower). Pity you did not photograph both upper and lower surfaces of same flowers and foliage. The use of different cameras and exposure issues complicate matters further. Are there any Petiolares section Primula with such pronounced emarginate petals? The first images are superficially similar to what I understand is Primula boothii susbp. autumnalis (have just posted images of this taken by my eldest son in Nepal) which as the name suggests flowers late in the year and is found at modest elevations, especially near a 'water source' (though most Himalayan Primulas "like their feet wet", yet the ends of the petals in that are nothing like your plant. Most peculiar and defeating me, for the present. Best Wishes, Chris Chadwell |
--
It is so helpful to receive input from those with the maximum knowledge/familiarity with a genus, especiallyfor examples we have been uncertain about.Important though, that Professor Richards is made aware of the location, altitude and month of flowering - justin case they impact upon his opinion. Perhaps an autumn-flowering variant?He has, as indicated in his e-mail about the Primula photographed at Munsyari, which he considers is P.boothii,recognised an autumn-flowering variant of that species, as subspecies autumnalis.Naturally, it is of special interest to members of this group, when a species, subspecies or variety has their rangeextended into Indian territory or recognised only in Indian territory.As far as I know, Richards 'determination' (not sure if he would count it as such) for this plant from Gori Valley means thisrepresents the first record of Primula gracilipes in Uttarakhand, as is the case for Primula boothii at Munsyari.
From: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Glad my input is appreciated.
To: C CHADWELL <chrischadwell261@btinternet.com>
Cc: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>; Nidhan Singh <nidhans...@gmail.com>; Balkar Arya <balka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 9 December 2016, 23:54
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fwd: [efloraofindia:258689] Gori Valley Tour: Primula for identification..
Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji.It is all because you requested that we take his opinion in this matter.