Comment on 比較美國: 部落客惡評麵店 賠20萬判拘役 II

[Luby Liao]

Thank you so much for the comment, Joyceren.  The problem is we don't have the 地院的判決書.  Could you provide the URL for the case?  Thank you very much, Luby

=====
joyceren just commented on the post "[NATPA Forum] 比較美國: 部落客惡評麵店 賠20萬判拘役 II" on Fight injustice before injustice destroys us all

地 院 的 判 決 書 中 寫 的 很 清 楚； 法 官 的 判 決 重 點 在 於 罵 店 家 惡 霸 及 有 蟑 螂。 你 如 果 純 粹 評 論 食 物 難 吃 很 鹹 我 想 店 家 要 告 的 贏 也 很 難… 先 不 論 店 家 的 營 業 損 失 多 少 …我 想 雖 然 只 是 個 賣 麵 的 小 吃 店 它 也 是 有 權 去 捍 衛 它 的 商 譽 及 多 年 建 立 下 來 的 口 碑。 對 一 家 老 店 的 商 譽 來 論 20 萬 應 屬 合 理 就 如 同 老 闆 所 說 等 於 不 給 我 飯 吃。 試 問 今 天 如 果 有 人 惡 意 攻 擊 你 想 砸 你 招 牌 或 個 人 名 譽 …你 可 以 默 默 接 受 嗎？ 到 底 是 老 闆 肚 量 太 小 執 意 提 告 還 是 對 方 根 本 沒 有 道 歉 誠 意？ 青 菜 蘿 蔔 各 有 所 好 不 論 是 否 有 去 消 費 過 都 不 應 該 選 在 此 時 落 井 下 石 才 對 ﹗
She never said too salty in her post. The true story is very easy to find online as many people been talking about this case.
As many foreigners already found the case number and the origional post...I guess you can find it as well.
Joyceren

Posterous is the place to post everything. Just email us.

Change your email settings or unsubscribe

--

Join [I Love Taiwan] group

Email:

Visit this group

[Taiwan_Echo]

The original post of Ms Liu. Liu's blog has closed down, but the article can be found here :

惡霸...味到小吃川味牛肉麵..難道正義感有錯嗎?
http://hk.myblog.yahoo.com/ecebwiw282/article?mid=811&fid=-1&action=next


The verdict of the first trial, which was on 2/15/2011 can be found here:

http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/PrintFJUD03_0.aspx?jrecno=99,%E6%98%93,3930,20110215,1&v_court=TCD+%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%E8%87%BA%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%B0%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2&v_sys=M&jyear=99&jcase=%E6%98%93&jno=3930&jdate=1000215&jcheck=1

Note that there were 2 trials. After the first trial, Ms Liu appealed. The ruling of the 2nd trial was delivered several days ago, but I don't have the case number.


Note, also, that in the first trial, there were several weirdo :

1. The judge listened to several "witnesses" --- among them the restaurant owner, who sued Ms Liu. That is, in Taiwan, you can go to the court to sue someone, and play the role of witness, too.

2. The judge called for Liu's colleage, Tsai, and asked her questions. Tsai's answer did not collaborate with the "hard to eat" part, but she answered clearly that the restaurant was greasy and dirty in both of her two visits. But obviously the judge ignored her testimony;

3. No evidence was provided to show Liu's article in any way effected the income of the restaurant.

2011/6/25 Luby Liao <luby...@gmail.com>

--
請隨時 造訪我們的網站 http://groups.google.com/group/i_love_taiwan
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/i_love_taiwan
 
若要退訂此論壇，請送電子郵件給 i_love_taiwa...@googlegroups.com 標題及本文空白就可.
To unsubscribe from this group, please send email to i_love_taiwa...@googlegroups.com
You can leave Subject and Body blank.

--
==================================================  
  .-.  http://echotaiwan.blogspot.com
 / ^|  http://michaelturton.blogspot.com
| ^ |  http://taiwanmatters.blogspot.com
 \ ^/  http://www.taiwanus.net/
  \|   http://www.taipeitimes.com
http://groups.google.com/group/i_love_taiwan?hl=en     
==================================================

[Taiwan_Echo]

The 2nd trial:

http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/FJUDQRY03_1.aspx?id=1&v_court=TCH+%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%E9%AB%98%E7%AD%89%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2+%E8%87%BA%E4%B8%AD%E5%88%86%E9%99%A2&v_sys=M&jud_year=100&jud_case=%E4%B8%8A%E6%98%93&jud_no=493&jud_title=%E5%A6%A8%E5%AE%B3%E5%90%8D%E8%AD%BD&keyword=&sdate=20110608&edate=20110608&page=&searchkw=

2011/6/26 Taiwan_Echo <taiwa...@gmail.com>