Nic"
Zev replied: "There are two things that currently exist resembling what you're
describing, Nic: Amara's browser-based transcriber, and ProTranscript.
The manual line by line timing in Amara (not word by word), as well as
the process you outlined, is of course a second pass, which is much less
efficient than the algorithm Mark and team are leveraging, but it's
free!"
------
Nic, we're certainly looking at getting some timing information from the manual transcription process, so yes that is a valid idea. We also have a time alignment tool at our disposal that takes text and media as inputs and then marries them up to produce timings. The time alignment tool we're using works better with smaller chunks, so there's a definite advantage to chunking stuff up.
Zev - yes Amara's subtitling tool is great and in fact we took a lot of ideas from that. Also you can use that to create subtitles and then submit then to the Hyperaudio Converter
http://hyperaud.io/lab/ha-converter/The tool we're most looking forward on finishing off is the Hyperaudio Cleaner that allows you to tweak roughly put together transcripts. Hope to show you a big improvement on this later
http://hyperaud.io/lab/ha-cleaner/v07/ (the idea is you click on a word, hit the adjust radio button and then tweak the timing of that word with the slier) - I think there's a lot more we can do here and will definitely be taking ideas on board.
Keep it coming! :)
Mark