Thx for a quick replay.
#1. It never does output anything.
However, this is when I run it in Tomcat war (on login of a user, I
add something to the distributed map).
If I unit test in eclipse or dos, the code works great.
Same code (add to the map) outputs the error when running in tomcat.
I think that's key.
2&3: When It runs in dos (outside of tomcat) it says:
Members [2] {
Member [
192.168.20.18:5701]
Member [
192.168.20.18:5702] this
}
And then it works fine (again, same code in tomcat never outputs
anything).
And here is other:
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
d:\>route PRINT
===========================================================================
Interface List
8 ...00 1a a0 c7 14 b3 ...... Intel(R) 82566DM-2 Gigabit Network
Connection
1 ........................... Software Loopback Interface 1
10 ...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 isatap.{7F9DB314-568F-45C8-
ABD1-1CA8DBC6C402}
9 ...02 00 54 55 4e 01 ...... Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
===========================================================================
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface
Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.20.1
192.168.20.18 25
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link
127.0.0.1 306
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link
127.0.0.1 306
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link
127.0.0.1 306
192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 On-link
192.168.20.18 281
192.168.20.18 255.255.255.255 On-link
192.168.20.18 281
192.168.20.255 255.255.255.255 On-link
192.168.20.18 281
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link
127.0.0.1 306
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link
192.168.20.18 281
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link
127.0.0.1 306
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link
192.168.20.18 281
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
None
IPv6 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
If Metric Network Destination Gateway
1 306 ::1/128 On-link
8 281 fe80::/64 On-link
8 281 fe80::80b9:5fc3:ef53:7994/128
On-link
1 306 ff00::/8 On-link
8 281 ff00::/8 On-link
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
None
d:\>ipconfig
Windows IP Configuration
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::80b9:5fc3:ef53:7994%8
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.20.18
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.20.1
Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 6:
Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 7:
Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
tia,
.V
On Oct 9, 10:17 am, "Talip Ozturk" <
ozta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Vic,
>
> The error you are getting telling us that the network interface
> Hazelcast is picking doesn't support Multicast.
>
> 1. Tell me what IP address Hazelcast picks... When Hazelcast starts up
> it should print out something like
> "Hazelcast 1.2 (2008) starting at Address{ip='192.168.1.2', port=5701}"
> Can you send me this line? What is the IP and the port you have there?
>
> 2. On that windows machine, on a DOS prompt can you please type "route
> PRINT" and send me the output.. this will tell us which network
> interface has multicast routing if any.
>
> 3. Again on a DOS prompt can you send me the output of "ipconfig" to
> see the known IP addresses.
>
> thanks,
> -talip
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:02 PM,
vcekven...@gmail.com