--- On Sun, 6/19/11, one mad dealer <Ga...@JosephsIAQ.com> wrote:
I commend the efforts by Dave, Gabe, Chris and others to get the remaining
systems back on line. As a life-long engineer I do understand the
complexities of this situation, and wish all of you the best. If it wasn't
for the fact that my Acadia would require a replacement compressor, cap,
contactors, control board, and the proposed mods - and then operate without
any sort of warranty (keeping fingers crossed) - I might have stuck it out.
Cost/benefit analysis in my case said to jump. For those who have working
systems to keep running, I really do hope you can salvage them and get the
kind of product what we all expected in the beginning.
Since I and some others no longer have the Acadias, yet would like to stay
informed about any future legal action, it is NOT unreasonable to suggest
setting up two discussions: one for legal, one for repair. There is nothing
devisive, pissy, or crying about this perfectly rational suggestion.
-Gregg
-----Original Message-----
From: hallowel...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:hallowel...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of RJP1267
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 11:40 AM
To: Hallowell Acadia
Subject: Re: Suggestion for this forum
Definitely not! This is where the action is. There's an enormous amount of
tech talk that is of value to many. Please stay.
The underlying problem is that many participants do not know how to use
threads. They hit "reply" and type whatever is on their minds, even if it
is a continuation of something discussed in a different thread. Because of
that, using daily digests for email delivery does not solve the problem: you
still have to sort through it all to see if there was something of interest
being discussed. I would posit that most people will ignore, rather than
sort through messages or the web interface, thereby missing some useful
information. (The fact that new joiners pose questions that have already
been answered testifies to that behavior.) If people adhered to threads,
we could stay in one big Google group. But that's not the reality.
Since the legal discussion is a low message-count activity (for now), I
suggested that it, not the technical discussions, be moved to a group
dedicated to that purpose. And let the engineering proceed civilly on this
thread! It looks like you guys are hot on the trail of some good solutions!
- Gregg
-----Original Message-----
From: hallowel...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:hallowel...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of one mad dealer
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 8:20 PM
To: Hallowell Acadia
Subject: Re: Suggestion for this forum
Gabe
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3715 - Release Date: 06/20/11