On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <
ia...@golang.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, <
athosc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was wondering if I should assume BSD 3 clause licenses for all the files
>> located under
>>
>> x/image/testdata and x/image/font/testdata
>>
>> since there are no licese notes regarding those files (fonts and images).
For x/image/font/testdata, the three fonts directly in that directory
(in .sfd and .otf / .ttf format) are original works by the Go Authors,
so they use the BSD 3 clause license like the rest of the repo.
For the x/image/font/testdata/fixed subdirectory, there is a README
that contains license notes.
For x/image/testdata, I think "git log" is the best source of per-file
license notes. For example:
$ git log testdata/tux.png
commit 94ba43c4786221df328229f694fa73a71558583b
Author: Nigel Tao <
nige...@golang.org>
Date: Tue Jun 17 21:51:57 2014 +1000
go.image/vp8l: new package.
The blue-purple-pink image comes from
http://blog.golang.org/gophercon
The tux and yellow_rose images come from
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery2 and according to
that page, those images are in the public domain.
The gopher-doc images are
http://golang.org/doc/gopher/doc.png
after quantizing its palette to 2/4/16/256 colors.
LGTM=r
R=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/109010043