MEDIUM,
RARE
WARNING:
30+ FCC Actions in One Year to Slice & Dice States’ Rights
& Consumer Protections.
On
Sept 26th, 2018, the three FCC Republicans;
Chairman Ajit Pai and the two commissioners, Brendan Carr and
Michael O’Reilly, will out-vote the one Democrat FCC Commissioner
Jessica Rosenworcel, in a number of ongoing proceedings.
Starting
in April 2017, the FCC created two specific FCC proceedings
designed to take away the public interest obligations on
communications services, slice by slice. There have been over
30+ different related actions and decisions
in just these two dockets to move the AT&T and Verizon agenda
along and erase basic consumer protections on all wired
services — in just one year.
- Accelerating Wireline
Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure
Investment WC Docket №17–84
- Accelerating Wireless
Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure
Investment; WT Docket №17–79;
At the
same time, the FCC is doing this so that it can then preempt the
states and cities’ rights to deal with wireless 5G and small cell
deployments.
Unfortunately,
we already know what the vote will look like as the
FCC put out an early draft. Moreover, Ajit
Pai was a senior attorney for Verizon; Brendan Carr worked for
Verizon as well as AT&T and the wireless association, CTIA,
while Commissioner O’Reilly is a vocal friend of ALEC, the
American Legislative Exchange Counsel. In fact, the
FCC’s 5G
plan being presented appears to have been created based on
the ALEC model legislation for 5G wireless that has been used in
multiple states.
So, more
like a vote taken in Russia, where the decision has already been
completed and the vote is rigged, the FCC is just doing this for
show. The FCC is presenting the new digital Potemkin village 5G
wireless plan, tied to the removal of basic rights and protections
of customers on the wired side.
As noted
by Commissioner Rosenworcel, during the past year these
proceedings have already thrown the public interest under the bus.
Rosenworcel
writes:
“Unfortunately, I
believe the bulk of this decision falls short of this statutory
mark. Let me explain why. When a carrier wants to make big changes
to its network, this agency had policies in place to ensure no
consumers were cut off from communications. In other words, leave
no consumer behind. We had rules that required carriers to educate
their customers about network alterations and simply answer calls
about how their service might be changed when old facilities were
swapped out for new. Today the FCC guts these basic
consumer protection policies. It tosses them out. It says we
don’t need them.”
There Is a
Subplot — Dismantle the state wired utilities, shut off the
copper, and replace it with wireless.
Most of
the discussion is now focused on the FCC’s removal of the rights
of states and cities to manage the wireless deployments and rights
of way in their own communities. As the
City of Murieta California put it:
“The Commissions’
proposed action could force cities to lease out publicly owned
property, eliminate reasonable local environmental and design
review, and eliminate the ability for cities to negotiate fair
leases or public benefits for the installation of “small cell”
wireless equipment on taxpayer-funded property based on updated
guidance.”
But
there’s an important subplot — the FCC has taken a year and
piled-on a collection of changes so that Verizon and AT&T can
‘shut off the copper’ wires, and not replace them with fiber
optics, but to hand over the existing wires to their wireless
company — because it make the companies more money. Getting rid of
any state-based obligations or federal rules that remain to do
this is what these proceedings are really all about.
And all
of this is being done alongside a slew of other harmful concurrent
actions:
- Get rid of all
competitors: There is a petition by the wireline
phone association, USTelecom, to remove the rights of
competitors to ‘interconnect’ and use the networks.
- Weed Whacking:
The FCC has been getting rid of all of the cost accounting rules
and regulations — and any leftover rules.
- Net Neutrality constraints
have been removed so that one company can control all services
over the wire, including the Internet and broadband, but also
wireless, and favor their own affiliates, etc.
- Privacy challenges continue
so that that the phone, wireless, cable or internet company can
track you, advertise to you, and sell your data.
In the
end, more importantly, these proceedings allow the wireless
companies to replace the wired networks, even for home and office
use, without the safeguards and basic consumer protections.
At the Core are the
Wires and FCC Treachery
In April
2017, the FCC starts and presents proceeding 17–84, and the first
round is to change the regulations by claiming that this is a plan
for fiber-based upgrades of the networks. Notice that it doesn’t
say anything about wireless.
To read the rest
of this article: