I can see that point of view - I agree they do overfragment - but I
also think that having a thing more specific than "all programming
topics" is useful. So we're debating where to draw the line, and that
is a pretty hard question to answer -
http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Joseph Turian <
jos...@metaoptimize.com> wrote:
> People have been using the MetaOptimize QA for this purpose:
>
>
http://metaoptimize.com/qa/search/?q=data&Submit=search&t=question
>
> I personally disagree with the stackexchange approach of fragmenting
> the data community into: AI, ML, statistics, NLP, data mining, etc.
>
> The original StackOverflow was for programmers of all stripes, and
> that model makes more sense for communities that naturally
> crosspolinate, like data.
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bay Area Data Drinking Group" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
bay-area-data-drinki...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Joseph Turian, Ph.D. | President, MetaOptimize
> "Optimize Profits. Optimize Engagement."
>
http://metaoptimize.com
> 855-ALL-DATA
>
> The web's best forum for data scientists:
http://metaoptimize.com/qa/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bay Area Data Drinking Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
bay-area-data-drinki...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>