Hi Dimitri and Taff,
With that simple 3v icosa geometry, the dome won't sit flat. Dimitri,
if you want to make a 4/9ths or 5/9ths dome, rather than a complete
sphere, it might be wise to use the Fuller-Kruschke version of the 3v
icosa, which has 3 triangle types instead of two and four edge lengths
rather than three.
Using the Fuller-Kruschke design, at a spherical radius of 57.07 cm,
which gives a floor radius of 56.06 cm, four CCD triangles (the
largest of three triangle types) can be cut from a single square tile
41 cm on a side.
I would bevel the edges, as Dimitri was planning to. I have made glued
models using plywood tiles and have found that the beveled edges help
to line things up correctly (having two or three extra pair of hands
would also be a big help!). Seven degrees for the beveling of edges
should be fine.
Beside's Taff's SketchUp model of the panel version of the Fuller-
Kruschke dome, the Info in the file 3v-icosa-classI-Fuller-Kruschke-
data.xls may be of use. Good luck.
Gerry in Quebec
On Aug 12, 3:16 pm, TaffGoch <
taffg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dimitri,
>
> Using 41cm tiles, you should be able to construct a 200cm diameter
> dome/sphere, maximum.
>
> I've posted a SketchUp model of the simplest of 3v geodesic domes, which is
> composed of only two triangle definitions:
http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=41afae94f708556821...
>
> With a large mortar/glue gaps, you may not have to worry about cutting the
> tile edges at the half-dihedral angles. The mortar/glue should hide the fact
> that the tile edges are cut at 90-degrees.
>
> -Taff
>
> 3v_geodesic_dihedrals.png
> 86KViewDownload