> Cartels don't work with more than a few members, somebody defects for
> the advantage. Mainstream media concentrated into six owners and one
> FCC radio frequency licensing produces strategically uniform results,
> but a million bloggers say whatever they want.
>
> Brian
Ah, but what if the ownership of the ISPs of the _readers_ of your
1,000,000 bloggers is just as consolidated as mainstream media?
And what if the FCC commissioner kills network neutrality so the
last-mile oligopoly can be leveraged into a hosting oligopoly?
Your 1,000,000 bloggers end up being forced to choose from among a
very small number of "mainstream" blog hosting providers, if they want
their blogs to be accessible to ordinary readers who have ordinary
residential Internet service.
FCC enforcement of network neutrality is recent, and even the phrase
"network neutrality" is fairly recent, but the _concept_ goes all the
way back. During the Reagan/Bush/Clinton/Bush/Obama1 administrations
we had de-facto net neutrality without FCC enforcement, because the
people who could have profited from violating it mostly chose not to.
I suspect that they mostly refrained from violating network neutrality
_because_ they were afraid of FCC regulation. With an FCC commissioner
who is unabashedly extremely pro-telcom-megacorp and anti-everyone-else,
I doubt that they will continue to refrain.
-- Robert