Heya,
> Individual frameworks are more likely to care about where frontend
> assets need to be placed. Proposing the package managers managing
> the frontend packages might be difficult as it would require a lot
> of extraneous configuration and might be a tough sell to the big
> package managers.
Well the idea is that packages describe themselves well enough that the
installer (through configuration in composer.json in our case) can do a
decent work of putting files where they belong.
> So support for this repository could be added to rails instead of to
> gem/bundler/whatever. Support could be added to Symfony, Zend, Cake,
> etc instead of to Composer.
I don't think you can separate them, because your app's packages depend
on the frontend packages, so it means you'd have to describe those
dependencies to the framework.
> Any thoughts on this idea/these questions, one way or another?
>
> This list seems pretty quiet. Has there been any traction off this list
> in getting anyone else interested in tackling this problem?
The only feedback I got was that there is a solution called volo [1]
that seems quite interesting, but is hardly complete, and is also
another package manager, so right now it does not really help us. If it
had centralized metadata I would happily add support for that.
The other thing I got is that some twitter guys are working on
something, but nobody felt like giving any more details. Sounds like the
typical "open source" process where you push something on to the crowd
and they better like it. A bit disappointing, but since I don't have
time to do anything on my own at the moment, I'm happy to wait and see
what comes out.
Cheers
[1]
https://github.com/volojs/volo
--
Jordi Boggiano
@seldaek -
http://nelm.io/jordi