ALBERT LE DIVIN, SES IMPERFECTIONS ET LA THEORIE DES CORDES

[Pentcho Valev]

http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/03/einstein-may-have-started-rot.html
Motl: "Einstein may have started the rot"...what string theory is
doing is nothing else than continuing in Einstein's program of
theoretical physics, while avoiding all of his known imperfections."

Motl Motl Motl what are you talking about. This is DEDUCTION Motl or
at least so Divine Albert has said. That is, all perfections and
imperfections are corollaries of "a small number of fundamental
assumptions, the so-called axioms". Knowing there are imperfections,
Motl, have you looked for some imperfect axiom? No? Why? Let me help
you. In Chapter 22 in "Relativity" the imperfect axiom is exposed by
Einstein himself:

"...the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which
constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special
theory of relativity [. . .] cannot claim any unlimited validity."

Here is the original version of the imperfect axiom, that is, the law
"which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the
special theory of relativity":

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ : "...light is
always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is
independent of the state of motion of the emitting body."

So Motl can you combine "independent of the state of motion of the
emitting body" and "cannot claim any unlimited validity"? Try and you
will make a great discovery.

Motl has already read this: http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/OntologyOUP_TimesNR.pdf
"What Can We Learn about the Ontology of Space and Time from the
Theory of Relativity?", John D. Norton: "In general relativity there
is no comparable sense of the constancy of the speed of light. The
constancy of the speed of light is a consequence of the perfect
homogeneity of spacetime presumed in special relativity. There is a
special velocity at each event; homogeneity forces it to be the same
velocity everywhere. We lose that homogeneity in the transition to
general relativity and with it we lose the constancy of the speed of
light. Such was Einstein's conclusion at the earliest moments of his
preparation for general relativity. ALREADY IN 1907, A MERE TWO YEARS
AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE SPECIAL THEORY, HE HAD CONCLUDED THAT THE
SPEED OF LIGHT IS VARIABLE IN THE PRESENCE OF A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD;
indeed, he concluded, the variable speed of light can be used as a
gravitational potential."

Sometimes it seems to Motl that the fact that THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS
VARIABLE IN THE PRESENCE OF A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD does not refute
Einstein's imperfect axiom introduced in 1905. In such cases Motl does
not try to avoid the imperfect axiom. Rather, Motl is happy and sings:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=706444693144627950&q=lubos+motl

Pentcho Valev

[Fred]

Pentcho Valev a écrit :

> Motl: "Einstein may have started the rot"...what string theory is

"Einstein", c'est le nom d'un virus ? Ca a l'air de donner la diarrhée
littéraire (quoique...) à Pancho. J'espère que ça se soigne rapidement.

fu2 fr.sci.chimie, à tout hasard

[Oncle Dom]

Pentcho Valev dans son message
1176304169.5...@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
nous a fait l'honneur d'ecrire:
Faut reconnaitre une chose:
- pour Pentcho, c'est Albert le divin
- pour Yanick, c'est Albert le cretin
L'un de ces deux posteurs est plus poli que l'autre
--
Oncle Dom
_________
http://perso.orange.fr/oncle.dom/

[R. Josh III]

Oncle Dom a écrit :

> Pentcho Valev dans son message
> 1176304169.5...@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> nous a fait l'honneur d'ecrire:
> Faut reconnaitre une chose:
> - pour Pentcho, c'est Albert le divin
> - pour Yanick, c'est Albert le cretin
> L'un de ces deux posteurs est plus poli que l'autre

Si Albert est ou était un crétin, Ya"n"ick est un crétin² ou même, sans
doute, un crétin^3 !

RJ

[Oncle Dom]

R. Josh III dans son message 461d1421$0$5090$ba4a...@news.orange.fr,
nous a fait l'honneur d'écrire:

> Si Albert est ou était un crétin, Ya"n"ick est un crétin² ou même,
> sans doute, un crétin^3 !
>

Sachant que Albert einstein fut un savant de première magnitude, que
Yanick est un crétin^x, et que Yanick a traité Einstein de crétin
trouver x ;-)

[R. Josh III]

Oncle Dom a écrit :

> R. Josh III dans son message 461d1421$0$5090$ba4a...@news.orange.fr,
> nous a fait l'honneur d'écrire:
>> Si Albert est ou était un crétin, Ya"n"ick est un crétin² ou même,
>> sans doute, un crétin^3 !
>>
> Sachant que Albert einstein fut un savant de première magnitude, que
> Yanick est un crétin^x, et que Yanick a traité Einstein de crétin
> trouver x ;-)

Première approche : x > 1 ( x \in \mathbb R )
Deuxième approche (plus affinée) : x >> 1.

RJ