Language Depot vs Language Forge

122 views
Skip to first unread message

LR-Language Software Support

unread,
Jan 18, 2017, 8:36:59 PM1/18/17
to flex...@googlegroups.com

I am interested in knowing the differences/similarities between Language Depot and Language Forge.  Which one is recommended (and why) for a full Send/Receive in FieldWorks?


Thank you,

 

James Post

Paul Nelson

unread,
Jan 18, 2017, 10:06:11 PM1/18/17
to flex...@googlegroups.com
Language Depot is the database backend used by FieldWorks *and* Language Forge.

Language Forge is a simple web front end to build a dictionary. Functionality is targeted to be somewhat like WeSay, only web based. Language Forge is still in beta development.

It is possible for a single project to have expert people using FieldWorks and communities using Language Forge.

Hope this helps,
Paul

From: LR-Language Software Support
Sent: ‎1/‎18/‎2017 7:37 PM
To: 'flex...@googlegroups.com'
Subject: [FLEx] Language Depot vs Language Forge

I am interested in knowing the differences/similarities between Language Depot and Language Forge.  Which one is recommended (and why) for a full Send/Receive in FieldWorks?


Thank you,

 

James Post

--
You are subscribed to the publicly accessible group "FLEx list".
Only members can post but anyone can view messages on the website.
To change your status, please write to flex_d...@sil.org.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FLEx list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to flex-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to flex...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/flex-list/e6a4ea811e554d2c8fdbb516818a11f7%40sil.org.pg.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Kent Rasmussen

unread,
Jan 18, 2017, 10:27:12 PM1/18/17
to flex...@googlegroups.com
Wow. I didn't get this. So if we sync between FLEx and ld.org, and the ld.org project has been imported to lf.org, then those changes should show up in lf.org? That would be awesome. -Kent

On 01/18/2017 09:05 PM, Paul Nelson wrote:
Language Depot is the database backend used by FieldWorks *and* Language Forge.

Language Forge is a simple web front end to build a dictionary. Functionality is targeted to be somewhat like WeSay, only web based. Language Forge is still in beta development.

It is possible for a single project to have expert people using FieldWorks and communities using Language Forge.

Hope this helps,
Paul

--
Kent Rasmussen
SIL Eastern Congo Group Linguistics Consultant / Conseiller en Linguistique de SIL au Congo de l'Est
Orthographies for eastern DRC / Orthographes pour la RDC de l'est
+1-541-357-7276

KenK

unread,
Jan 18, 2017, 11:01:32 PM1/18/17
to flex...@googlegroups.com
It *IS* awesome. Ken
--
You are subscribed to the publicly accessible group "FLEx list".
Only members can post but anyone can view messages on the website.
To change your status, please write to flex_d...@sil.org.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FLEx list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to flex-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to flex...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 

Kent Rasmussen

unread,
Jan 19, 2017, 10:03:15 AM1/19/17
to flex...@googlegroups.com
Well, I was about to cry foul, but then I noticed the "synchronize" button in lf.org. So it doesn't automatically keep up to date (i.e., it's not actually using that repo as its source), but it's pretty close.
It looks like there is a repository change only when you synchronize back (not when lf.org says 'saved'), and the user responsible for those changes is "Language Forge". Is there any way to see which Language forge user made those changes? It looks like I can find that information on lf.org, at least....
In any case, thanks for the work; it's looking good!

Grace,

Kent
On 01/18/2017 10:01 PM, KenK wrote:
> It *IS* awesome. Ken
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages