Hi Michele
It's not a bad idea - in fact, it's a good one. No-one would be happier
about finding ways for others to pitch in with the docs than me :)
The main barrier is the fact that the syntax highlighting (which is
obviously crucial for intelligibility) currently comes from the Emacs
extempore-mode, which is then baked into the CSS during a bespoke (read:
hacked-together) site generation process for my blog.
I think the best solution to this problem is to teach linguist[0],
GitHub's language parser/syntax highliting engine about xtlang. That
way, xtlang code would get rendered nicely on a GH wiki, and we could
also (I think) use the linguist parser to do syntax-highlighting
wherever else we wanted it.
The best way to get *that* happening is probably to modify the Scheme
language support. I think linguist can understand tmbundles (TextMate
bundles), so looking at the Sublime Text extempore mode might be useful
as well.
I don't have the time to look into that at the moment, but I'm happy to
provide tips/support if anyone from the community is keen to dive in and
have a go.
I'm also open to other ideas about the "syntax-highlighting xtlang on
the web" problem (e.g. an atom or Jupyter plugin pretty please!), but
those are my initial thoughts.
Cheers,
Ben
[0]
https://github.com/github/linguist - Pygments would be another
option, but GH have moved away from that it seems.