UPS WorldShip 2011

[NCI508]

We are running Everest Version 5.0.2.6, and we would like to upgrade
to UPS WorldShip 2011. Everest Technical Support has informed me that
they have not tested WorldShip 2011, so they were unable to supply me
wtih the field mapping. UPS Technical Support is not familar with
Everest, so they could not help. Would anyone know how the fields are
to be mapped?

[Erik O]

We are utilizing Worldship 2011 on Everest 5035. We originally set up
the mappings for Worldship 2008 or so and simply followed the mappings
suggested in the Everest documentation. Unfortunately, I can't find it
right now or I'd attach it to my reply. Follow the directions and it
works.

[Sascha]

We successfully upgraded to WorldShip 2011 without a problem and using
the same mappings as before.

In case you don't have the document from Everest (back in the day when
these - and many others - were available on their support website),
here it is:

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0Bw9LZHT411iZMjVhZDczZGItYWMxOC00ZmEwLThhNDgtOTE2YTAyZjAyZTZh&hl=en_US

On Oct 12, 2:51 pm, NCI508 <ccamelo2...@gmail.com> wrote:

[NCI508]

We are setup with the Worldship 2008 mappings. Thank you for letting
me know that the 2008 mappings apply to 2011.

> > to be mapped?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[NCI508]

I do have the document from Everest. Thank you for letting me know
that the mappings in the document will work in Worldship 2011.

On Oct 13, 12:15 pm, Sascha <saschad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We successfully upgraded to WorldShip 2011 without a problem and using
> the same mappings as before.
>
> In case you don't have the document from Everest (back in the day when
> these - and many others - were available on their support website),
> here it is:
>

> https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0Bw...

>
> On Oct 12, 2:51 pm, NCI508 <ccamelo2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > We are running Everest Version 5.0.2.6, and we would like to upgrade
> > to UPS WorldShip 2011.  Everest Technical Support has informed me that
> > they have not tested WorldShip 2011, so they were unable to supply me
> > wtih the field mapping.    UPS Technical Support is not familar with
> > Everest, so they could not help.  Would anyone know how the fields are

[Paul Mandeltort]

Versata could learn a thing or two from UPS about backward compatibility...

--P

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everest (Icode/Versata) ERP Users Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to evere...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everest-erp...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everest-erp?hl=en.

--
--Paul
---------
Paul Mandeltort
pma...@gmail.com

[Sarvesh]

Hi,

This might help you.

1. From the UPS WorldShip workstation, launch UPS WorldShip.
2. Go to UPS OnLine Connect 􀃆 Connection Assistant…
3. Choose the action “Create a new map for Import”, then click “Next”.
4. For Import Data Types, choose “Shipment”, and then click “Next”.
5. For the Data Source, select the option “By Known ODBC Source”.
6. Select “UPS_WORLDSHIP_EVEREST_IMPORT” as the ODBC source
7. For ID, enter the SQL user name and password and click “Next”.
8. Select the “New Map” option.
9. Type in the map name as “Everest Sales Order Import”.
10. Click “Next” when complete and then “Finish” when you get to the
final step. The
program may take a few minutes before the next window opens up.
11. Under ODBC Tables, select “V_SHIP_IMPORT_FOR_SO”.
12. Under WorldShip Fields, select “Ship To”
13. From the “V_SHIP_IMPORT_FOR_SO” ODBC table, select “ORDER_NO” and
click the
“Define Primary Key for import” button. You will notice a key
appearing to the left side
of the “order_no” column.
14. On the left pane select “CUST_CODE” and select the “Customer ID”
from right pane.
15. Click on the “Connect” button.
16. Repeat the same procedure for ship-to fields.


Regards,

Sarvesh Desai

[NCI508]

Thank you, Sarvesh.

[RX]

Is there a way to map Worldship with Everest V4.0.2 SP2.

I have the OBDC setup but I do not see V_SHIP_IMPORT_FOR_SO in the ODBC table.

Thanks.

[Torbett]

Is a Worldship intergration better than Starship?

 

We've had starship since 2004. We ship UPS, FedEx and US Postal, all managed thru starship 'Rate Shop' feature. We figure the savings using Rate Shop far exceeds the cost of the product, plus no in-house developement support time need.

--
Email sent to Google Groups: "Everest (Icode/Versata) ERP Users Group" group.
 
- Post: evere...@googlegroups.com
- Unsubscribe: everest-erp...@googlegroups.com
- More options: http://groups.google.com/group/everest-erp?hl=en
-------------------
Access the Everest Resources Repository here: http://bit.ly/tbAy8L

--

C Torbett Crocker

@JacksonDriving

 

[Garrett]

I have heard that its possible to somehow utilize UPS Worldship for USPS shipments (not UPS Mail Innovations). Anyone doing this?  We have been using Starship for 5+ years.  For the most part it has been a pretty good product.  Unfortunatly, I cannot stand the changes that they have made with their newest releases.  It is now cumbersome, and slow.  We only use UPS, and USPS.

[RX]

Anybody???

[Tom]

Not sure if this helps, but we store the UPS data in a temporary table and then we have a program that runs as a schedule to verify the orders exist in Everest and then insert records to this table  SHIPMENT_TRACKING_DETAILS in Everest

I would imagine you could probably insert records directly, but there would be no chance to catch bad data and being that I didn't create this integration I have no idea what bad data would do here!

-Tom

--

[Joseph Pierce]

FedEx also offers the same service.  It’s called FedEx Smart Post.  UPS wanted a shipment of at least 50 SurePost shipments per day to allow us to use the service.  FedEx did not have a minimum.

 

Joe

 

From: evere...@googlegroups.com [mailto:evere...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Planet Scott
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 3:02 AM
To: evere...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Everest-ERP] Re: UPS WorldShip 2011

 

THe service you are talking about is UPS SurePost  (Was called UPS Basic)  It allows you to ship to PO Boxes.  The Surepost is a cheaper service and uses USPS to deliver the last leg.

 

Scott 

--
Email sent to Google Groups: "Everest (Icode/Versata) ERP Users Group" group.
 
- Post: evere...@googlegroups.com
- Unsubscribe: everest-erp...@googlegroups.com
- More options: http://groups.google.com/group/everest-erp?hl=en
-------------------
Access the Everest Resources Repository here: http://bit.ly/tbAy8L

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. SupplyDIRECT, Inc. 2550 Collins Springs Dr Suite B, Smyrna, GA 30080, USA, www.supplydirectinc.com

[Paul Mandeltort]

Not sure if it's improved since, but FedEx smartpost used to have horrible reliability and delivery timeline problems. Would take up to a week or two to get packages a state over.   Tracking was also screwy because packages would often get lost between the USPS/FedEx handoff and the two orgs would blame each other.  Customers watching packages would seem them get routed through bizarre states on the other side of the country and of course get pissed off. 

We tried it a few years back and promptly ditched it.  Maybe it's gotten better, but at the time even the FedEx reps wouldn't recommend it unless you're shipping some really commodity-type stuff.