""Node faces are small pieces of graphical information that can be linked to nodes. For instance, text labels or external images could be linked to nodes and they will be plotted within the tree image.
Several types of node faces are provided by the main ete2 module, ranging from simple text (TextFace) and geometric shapes (CircleFace), to molecular sequence representations (SequenceFace), heatmaps and profile plots (ProfileFace). A complete list of available faces can be found at the ete2.treeview reference page..""
which is why I wrote this piece in my code:--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The ETE toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to etetoolkit+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to eteto...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/etetoolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[[0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4] |
[0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2] |
[0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4] |
[0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4] |
[0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4]] |
I am sorry but I did "not" intend to ask for an interpretation, I only wanted to know if there is a difference between the heat map produced by matplotlib and ETE but I have figured that out. Thanks!!
I am using the trick that you mentioned for getting the color schemes for heatmap which works just fine.
When I meant color scale was: I want the vertical color scale bar which appears on the right side of the heat map which I made in matplotlib and if there is an alternative for the same?
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:03:37 PM UTC-5, Jaime Huerta Cepas wrote:there are 3 color schemes available, but they are hardcoded. You could also use the trick published here https://groups.google.com/d/msg/etetoolkit/_3adcV-rBec/TT9dfodkd1EJ to create your own color gradients.It's normal that your matplotlib heatmap looks different, vectors in the tree are sorted according to their similarity. That's the whole point of a clustering analysis, but I am afraid that the interpretation of results goes beyond the scope and purpose of this list :)cheers,jaime