Javier Sanz <
jsceb...@gmail.com> writes:
> Now that I have used Helm more, I have to say that I am impressed. The initial
> behavior of C-x C-f put me back (1) but in general Helm is really awesome.
Note that a lot of people are using `find-file' which is helmized by
helm-mode thinking they are using `helm-find-files', it is a different
thing than `helm-find-files' though the navigation is quite the same.
> I wanted to suggest the keybindings that I am using now. They allow both
> consistent behaviour with the rest of Emacs/shells (
http://en.wikipedia.org/
> wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishment) and easy navigation alternating C-n with
> C-tab to switch to next element and execute-persistent-action in the element,
> something that the bindings in my previous post didn't allow so easily.
>
> (define-key helm-map (kbd "C-i") 'helm-execute-persistent-action)
Note that C-i == TAB
> (define-key helm-map (kbd "<C-tab>") 'helm-execute-persistent-action)
> (define-key helm-map (kbd "C-z") 'helm-select-action)
Some prefer this, some prefer the default bindings, so as it is
configurable, I prefer leaving the default as it is, up to the user to
configure as he want.
> Keep up the good work,
>
> Javier
>
> (1) I'm not the only one, the guy at
http://steckerhalter.co.vu/
> steckemacs.html, who as you can see has tried quite a lot of stuff in Emacs,
> says "I'm not using Helm Find Files to browse files anymore. I tried using it
> but gave up after a while. I found it to be more cumbersome than ido-mode. But
> in general I really like to have Helm around"
The problem is that people are using `helm-find-files' as they use ido,
without knowing all the features of `helm-find-files'.
`helm-find-files' can be compared to a virtual dired from where you can
access to any directory and work from there without opening a new dired
buffer, so it is much more featured than ido and hardly comparable.
Thanks for your feedback.