Can you quote some statements in here? (Well, no, actually I want to abandon this and move all discussions to forum.electology.org but whatever.)
Clay S
unread,
Sep 11, 2018, 6:40:57 PM9/11/18
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to The Center for Election Science
More from Antony Green:
I'm happy to admit that my expertise is with an electoral systems that millions of people have used for a century to elect parliaments. I'll put that ahead of expertise in a theoretical electoral system that nobody uses.
My response:
That's a bizarre way of thinking that essentially guarantees you won't innovate over a system that was invented over 100 years ago, before virtually every major advance in our understanding of voting systems. You should understand that most of the major benefits of these newer systems are just objective facts, not "theoretical". E.g. precinct summability, monotonicity, Favorite Betrayal Criterion.
Marylander
unread,
Sep 12, 2018, 9:08:32 AM9/12/18
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message