Waiting to last minute? :). What ultrasonics you using? The more likely cause I would think would be electrical interference. Are you using one battery for everything? It's best to have a separate battery for you control electronics. If not lots of caps, etc to filter. Brushed or brushless motor matters a lot as well. Brushed motors generate a lot of emf noise.
JesseJay
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "diyrovers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diyrovers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diyr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diyrovers/557ad722-e9c1-4686-b1d2-f32b5e832952%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I second mechanical insulation -- something as simple as using got glue may add enough viscosity to dampen chassis transmission.
Add dense foam panels/baffles on the paths between the motors and the sensors, to Shor's direct resisted ultrasound.
Additionally, add panels/baffles to block done going out from motor and bouncing back.
For electronics, rather than two batteries, you can use a Y splitter, and put a filter between the motor controllers and logic. A DC DC converter is often a decent filter; a linear regulator often has excellent rejection (80 dB) but has problems at high correct. Or use a cap-inductor-cap topology. Big caps and big inductor needed though --- 1000 if, 470 uH, and up (rated for your expected currents plus 30% margin.)
Finally -- the Doppler effect of moving (especially fast) may get in the way. Of you keep the car on stilts and run the motors, do you still observe this problem?
Jw
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diyrovers/CANqFZg2g-9U%3D4BiQFn%2Bf-oYy9dLRNKm5fHCHOkoMQj6nC4EBMQ%40mail.gmail.com.