enum SdpSemantics {
"plan-b",
"unified-plan"
};
partial dictionary RTCConfiguration {
SdpSemantics sdpSemantics;
}
Interoperability and Compatibility
There is limited compatibility between the old and the new SDP format. Applications with a single audio and video stream are expected to function as before, but applications that need multiple audio and video streams on the same PC are likely to need modification.
Applications that previously supported Firefox may detect the new behavior as Firefox, and therefore continue working with no changes.
Applications that need more time to convert once the changeover date is announced may use "sdpSemantics='plan-b'" to get the older behavior for some time still, but note that this flag will be removed again at some point.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "discuss-webrtc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to discuss-webrt...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/discuss-webrtc/CAOqqYVGdEOiHuUGPXVABvMOiSh%2BACmOK4A4fCDnTro4o1qxvkw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "discuss-webrtc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to discuss-webrtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
is there a chance you can remove the a=ssrc msid lines before the branch cut?
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/discuss-webrtc/CADxkKiKxQJugTc7pDRN48Uvv7FPnaY-M%2BPqKWU6wnZm1mFXqPw%40mail.gmail.com.
In the initial offer? Do they do any harm?These enable plan B browsers to reply to Unfiied Plan offers in a parseable manner for the single-track-per-media-type case; I was thinking that they would stay in until we remove Plan B support entirely.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/discuss-webrtc/CAOqqYVFsd6pONar2%3D_UAa1qbOjGaUbiixd_k9OdmaFL7kRhm4g%40mail.gmail.com.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "discuss-webrtc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to discuss-webrtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/discuss-webrtc/26505dd1-cc34-4d57-a8bd-c6ad11f15755%40googlegroups.com.
When Unified Plan is activated that using command "–enable-blink-features=RTCUnifiedPlanByDefault" and open the canonical video chat app appr.tc to test P2P communication between "Plan B and Unified Plan" on Canary, it crashed after a while.
When doing test with our local clients to see incompatibility between Plan B and Unified Plan, one-way speech path problem that Unified Plan side couldn't hear the Plan B's voice occurred. Also this problem is occurring on talky.io which is WebRTC test client.
Similar issue with one-way speech path. Unified Plan side couldn't show the Plan B's video.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "discuss-webrtc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to discuss-webrtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/discuss-webrtc/dfb4e99b-63ce-4340-b7ac-48b54d58231e%40googlegroups.com.