Looking at WebRTC source code, I don't see PeerConnection
configuration for direct connection which would be the case when all
clients are in the same Intranet.
Are we required to use a STUN server even when there isn't a firewall
to punch-through?
BTW, could someone confirm definitely that Chrome Canary
implementation of WebRTC as it stands currently *cannot* create
PeerConnections between two clients with same external IP address? If
so, whether this will be remedied eventually or not?
Best,
Don Park
> No, a STUN server is not required when there is no NAT.Great. What should be passed as configuration? NULL or empty string?
Is a STUN/TURN server now required given that the API has changed since last March? I can't seem to find a conclusive answer on the Internet.I want to set this up in an Intranet scenario for demonstration purposes and I'm not sure if I need to rely on an internal STUN server or not (our lab will be segmented from the Internet).
Host machines will be on the same subnet on the network, so there isn't going to be any NAT involved.-Robert
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "discuss-webrtc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to discuss-webrt...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Very early webrtc days for me - but I am interested in the "intranet" use case - from what I see of the API's (in chrome) it does not seem possible to create a peer connection without ICE - what have I missed - if I do just pass a NULL string to the array - what "candidates" do I get ?
Please excuse if this a sumb newbiw question - I am now 3 days into my webrtc journey.
-- Regards, Adam