Hi Chris,
That was an interesting blog post, if a little depressing in places. Thanks for
that. I've been rather out of touch with JISC developer activities for the past
couple of years or so, having been sucked in to an EU project, and currently
planning a "sabbatical" with at best part-time employment for a year or so.
I've been fortunate enough that I'm in a position to pursue a slightly different
model. Roughly, I'm putting a few months of my own effort into an open source
project that I think may fill a gap in the RDM landscape, and also scratching a
few personal itches ([1], in case you're interested). If I'm right, I'll end up
with the bare bones and proven basics of a tool that can be adapted relatively
cheaply to meet specific researchers needs.
Your comments about no more small projects were disappointing to hear, as I had
been hoping to tap small-project funding to support the specific adaptations,
while keeping the core system more of a generic tool not specifically tailored
to HE/research. My intent was that it /should/ look like very good value for
money to a funder like Jisc, as they wouldn't be paying for the experimental
foundational work, but just the "superstructure" elements that deliver concrete
results. From your recent discussions, does that seem like a non-starter with
the "new Jisc"?
Regards,
#g
--
[1]
https://github.com/gklyne/annalist/tree/develop
- it's still very work-in-progress,
aiming for a demonstrable prototype in the next month.