On 2 Mar 2014, at 21:47, FloatingWombat <
timthefloa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dr WOMBAT if you please :-) I didn't spend 3 years avoiding the dole for nothing you know (well the grant for the PhD paid better)!
I tend not to use Dr on myself outside of the academic context, so it never occurs to me that others might for themselves. :)
> And WOMBAT sholud be in capitals - it is an acronym after after all :-)
>
It isn’t in all caps in the name associated with your email address…!
> I would be more concerned with the other specs and the overall performance than the screen size.
Fair enough, though my vision makes the screen size potentially a big deal in the sense that something too small can be a deal-breaker.
> The 5" screen on my DS1052E is good enough - mostly I am focussed on about 1" or 2" of the screen at a time. At work the scopes have screens up to about 12" - but still you look at 1" to 2”.
Yeah, I was thinking exactly this—that “the action” is no bigger but the screen may be filled with extra distractions.
> The big issue is the screen resolution - the screen on my Rigol is QVGA which is a bit blocky. Looking at the Tenma on Google - it is a 7" screen but all the images I have seen the menu buttons are shown - this eats up the extra real estate of the bigger screen.
>
Exactly.
Thanks!