--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DAISY Pipeline Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to daisy-pipeline-...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.<daisy-pipeline_hangs.log.zip>
Romain.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DAISY Pipeline Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to daisy-pipeline-...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.<daisy-pipeline_hangs.log.zip>
cheers,
Javi
cheers,
Javi
Romain.
./dp2 nimas-fileset-validator --i-source ~/Downloads/9780618900824NIMAS/9780618900824NIMAS.opf --x-output-dir /tmp/dpout
[DP2] Waiting for the WS to come up[DP2] The daisy pipeline 2 WS is up!
[DP2] Job with id aabb17f0-c25c-4c64-9ceb-2473916c2e26 submitted to the server
[WS] INFO(1) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Loading DTBook document.[WS] INFO(2) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Validating DTBook document.[WS] INFO(3) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Validating package document.[WS] INFO(4) - Message:(debug) Nimas fileset validator: Validating package document against RNG.
It hangs for a very long time at this point. I have confirmed that it will hang for more than 3 hours with only jetty messages continually appearing in the log. A log file is attached for this job execution (though not the 3-hour version :)I have another, smaller NIMAS sample that causes it to hang at a different point:
[DP2] Job with id 5dbfd42e-cfa5-4f95-9ab6-09fa6d38897a submitted to the server
[WS] INFO(1) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Loading DTBook document.[WS] INFO(2) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Validating DTBook document.[WS] INFO(3) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Validating package document.[WS] INFO(4) - Message:(debug) Nimas fileset validator: Validating package document against RNG.[WS] INFO(5) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Checking that PDFs exist on disk.[WS] INFO(6) - Message:(debug) Nimas fileset validator: Validating package document; combining reports.[WS] INFO(7) - Message:(debug) Nimas fileset validator: Validating package document against schematron.[WS] INFO(8) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Formatting report as HTML.[WS] INFO(9) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Creating reports index.
Compare with another, smaller sample (included in the Nimas fileset validator test dir), which runs just fine:
./dp2 nimas-fileset-validator --i-source ../../../../../pipeline-scripts/nimas-fileset-validator/src/test/MathML_Modular_Extension_Example_2/MathML_Sample2.opf --x-output-dir /tmp/dpout
[DP2] Job with id 3544229a-2855-4232-96b0-1d918c4f94d1 submitted to the server
[WS] INFO(1) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Loading DTBook document.[WS] INFO(2) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Validating DTBook document.[WS] INFO(3) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Loading DTBook document.[WS] INFO(4) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Validating DTBook document.[WS] INFO(5) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Validating package document.[WS] INFO(6) - Message:(debug) Nimas fileset validator: Validating package document against RNG.[WS] INFO(7) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Checking that PDFs exist on disk.[WS] INFO(8) - Message:(debug) Nimas fileset validator: Validating package document; combining reports.[WS] INFO(9) - Message:(debug) Nimas fileset validator: Validating package document against schematron.[WS] INFO(10) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Formatting report as HTML.[WS] INFO(11) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Creating reports index.[WS] INFO(12) - Message:Nimas fileset validator: Storing reports to disk in output directory: file:/tmp/dpout
[DP2] The job 3544229a-2855-4232-96b0-1d918c4f
<nimas-fileset-validator.xpl>
Just FYI. The Pipeline 1 has the same issue. It simply fails to create a complete error report after it hits a certain number of errors. I’d guess this is a limitation of jing. Would there be any way of truncating the error list if you hit many errors of the same type? Such as a failure that simply gives the failure info with an annotation that there are <nnnn> more….
Maybe this is too intrinsic to jing and out of your control.
Just thoughts.
Keith