Hi, Tim and Scooter …
I’m clocking a Cytoscape startup on a Windows 10 VM on Windows 10 host running off SSD and in 6GB RAM and Ivy Bridge (5 year old) processor. I get 45 seconds (timed from launch to Welcome window) with a few apps loaded, independent of whether there’s a fresh reboot. Without the apps, I see 23 seconds, which is well within expectations. This is consistent with our Windows 7 VM experience, too … and on Macs.
When running the same VM off a hard disk, I get 52 seconds for the first startup and 22 seconds for a second startup.
This is with v3.5, but I see no reason for a difference between 3.4 and 3.5. You’re welcome to try 3.5 for yourself … it’s at http://bit.ly/2fPG4R8
I’m puzzled at your timings, too.
Reading your post carefully, it looks like all of your configurations are hard disk based. Are any SSDs, and if so, do they time out the same way??
I wonder if there is any network issue that’s causing timeouts to occur during startup. One network access I’m aware of is connected with the News Feed on the Welcome screen. It fetches http://chianti.ucsd.edu/cytoscape-news/news.html, but does so only in the last 25% of the startup. Does this slowness occur if you completely disable your network?? (… just a test)
Are you using an unusual Java?? … as an experiment, would you mind starting Cytoscape from the Cytoscape.bat file … and beforehand, set the PATH= to *only* C:\Windows\System32?? I’m wondering if there’s something time consuming on your path.
Also, on one of the poorly performing systems, would you mind installing the cy3 Performance Reporter app in Cytoscape?? http://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/cy3performancereporter ... Then shut down Cytoscape, start Cytoscape, and use the Apps | Generate Performance Report menu to bring up the statistics window. The Submit button doesn’t work … if you could put the window contents in the clipboard and paste them in an e-mail to me (idekerlab...@gmail.com), I’d appreciate seeing the numbers.
Thanks for trying so hard to get Cytoscape performance up … we’re as surprised as you, and we’d like to get to the bottom of this.
Thanks!
From: cytoscape...@googlegroups.com [mailto:cytoscape...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim S
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 6:47 AM
To: cytoscape-helpdesk
Subject: [cytoscape-helpdesk] Re: cytoscape is extremely slow
Hi Scooter,
Thanks for your response. We have the same problem on all deskptop pc's. It is not related to installed apps. We are running windows 7 enterprise 64x, but everything is locally stored on the harddrive without any remote connections needed. We have the same issue on 4 different kind of windows pc's, varying from i5 6500 pc's with 8gb of ram (all assigned to cytoscape) to Xeon with 64gb RAM and they are all equally slow. Any possible suggestions as to what could cause this. As far as we can recall older versions were not as slow with loading as this version. It takes a very long time loading the "OSGi container" (4 minutes 12 seconds) and loading the rest is 10 seconds and then the org.cytoscape.equations-functions-impl started is an additional 2 minutes. In total it took over 7 minutes to start cytoscape. I really hope this will be better in version 3.5 ( 3.6?)
Tim
Op donderdag 1 december 2016 17:16:23 UTC+1 schreef Scooter Morris:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cytoscape-helpdesk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cytoscape-helpd...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cytoscape...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cytoscape-helpdesk.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi, Tim –
Great job making this progress … it sounds like ICT has set a group policy that may be causing this. It would be good to address this with them … it’s quite possible that a rational policy setting is having unintended consequences. I remain interested in what turns up.
To compare your numbers to mine, here’s what I see
Total Launch Duration: yours=153186, mine=14189
Framework Launch Duration: yours=127654, mine=8658
For individual bundle startups (i.e., the last number for each bundle), your numbers are about half mine. This speaks to the much better performance of your CPU … meaning that I really should get a new machine. J
So, whatever is happening, it’s happening very early in the Cytoscape startup … there must be a clue in there … good to take to the ICT people for the group policy sleuthing.
(If the difference is in policies, it could be that enterprise policy is to involve central file servers *much* more than on unmanaged machines. You can see how much code/data Cytoscape is carrying by looking at your CytoscapeConfiguration directory. Not small. If there is major transfer of that directory during startup, we could see times as long as yours if your network is busy, slow or unoptimized. This is a shot in the dark, but we’ve seen odd enterprise / central server configurations in the past.)
Best of luck … please keep us in the loop.
--