Dear all menbers,
We recently ligation a gRNA into PX330 but all failed following protocol given in forum. Our step as follow:


First Round ligation:
1.digest 5ug PX330 and gel purity with kit the finnal concentration is 20-30ng/ul
2.Phosphorylate and anneal oligos 100uM
3.50ng digested PX330 with 1ul undiluted annealed oligo duplex to ligation in T4 ligase following ligation protocol
4.transformation
sequencing with human U6 primer and all picked clone is PX330 backbone.(we thought it might be undigested plasmids contamination in gel purity)
Our BbsI was stored in -20°C for severeal months, after digenstion PX330 it appeared two bands.we cut and purified the upper one (left picture is lower band).
After that we picked 3-4 clones mixed in one tube to sequencing found it's ligation efficiency is very low, we tested 4 mixed sample just one is correct.
To improve ligation efficiency we performed next ligation:
1.Following new version protocol, perform digestion and ligation in one step (this method I used before and it's works well)
2.This time we changed a new BbsI and T4 Ligase from NEB. Reaction buffer was prepared by NEB recommend:buffer 2.1 with 1mM ATP
3.before ligation we check if 1ul BbsI can digest 100ng PX330 find it's okay to totally digestion within 1h.(left with three lane:1kb ladder/PX330/digested px330)
4.After ligation we picked 10 clones for sequencing but all backbone plasmids too.
I was confused why our ligation efficiency is relatively low? who can give us a suggestion?
I found there are a subtle difference between two version protocol, in old version protocol oligo duplex concentration was 100mM but new version was 100uM does this important to ligation results? I caculated it's mol ratio to plasmids we used in ligation is around 1:40. We use 100mM oligo duplex to do ligation before and it's efficiency is very high nearly 90%.