etcd 2.0 - when will it be included in a CoreOS release?

[Spencer Brown]

I mean, hey, it's been 19 hours since Alex put out the etcd 2.0 availability notice... :)

[Alex Polvi]

We have a wide array of users outside of CoreOS that use etcd, so we shipped it without adding it to CoreOS. To put it in CoreOS, we have to do a rolling update to a live running cluster, and we are doing some extra double checking on that feature in particular before rolling it out on CoreOS itself. 

"soon"

-Alex

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Spencer Brown <spe...@spencerbrown.org> wrote:

I mean, hey, it's been 19 hours since Alex put out the etcd 2.0 availability notice... :)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CoreOS User" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to coreos-user...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Brandon Philips]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Spencer Brown <spe...@spencerbrown.org> wrote:

> I mean, hey, it's been 19 hours since Alex put out the etcd 2.0 availability
> notice... :)

In the meantime you can try it out inside of a container:
https://github.com/coreos/etcd/releases/tag/v2.0.0

Brandon

[Christopher Armstrong]

>  and we are doing some extra double checking on that feature in particular before rolling it out on CoreOS itself. 

Thank you :)

[Aristomenis Pikeas]

It's been almost a month - is there a reason etcd 2.0 hasn't made it into CoreOS?

[Alex Polvi]

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Aristomenis Pikeas <pik...@gmail.com> wrote:

It's been almost a month - is there a reason etcd 2.0 hasn't made it into CoreOS?

Yes, we are still testing migration from 0.4.x to 2.0.x. I'd recommend just using a docker container if you'd like to pull etcd 2.0.3: 

docker run quay.io/coreos/etcd:v2.0.3

-Alex

[Lance Linder]

Just tried to get this working the other day.  Was able to get Ectd v2.0.3 cluster bootstrapped on CoreOS 557.2.0 but from my experience fleet 0.9.0 isn't compatible with Ectd v2.0.3, for example 'list-machines' doesn't show all machines in the cluster and starting services also fails.  Using curl and Ectd rest apis I can see the cluster is healthy and I can store/query for values but fleet is more or less broken.

I suppose I could run both Ectd 0.4.6 and 2.0.3 to get fleet working again and continue testing but that seems a little ridiculous. 

Lance

[Brandon Philips]

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Lance Linder <lli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just tried to get this working the other day. Was able to get Ectd v2.0.3
> cluster bootstrapped on CoreOS 557.2.0 but from my experience fleet 0.9.0
> isn't compatible with Ectd v2.0.3, for example 'list-machines' doesn't show
> all machines in the cluster and starting services also fails. Using curl
> and Ectd rest apis I can see the cluster is healthy and I can store/query
> for values but fleet is more or less broken.
>
> I suppose I could run both Ectd 0.4.6 and 2.0.3 to get fleet working again
> and continue testing but that seems a little ridiculous.

Can you gather up logs from fleet and etcd and more information about
your environment? This is certainly not expected. Filing a bug at
github.com/coreos/etcd/issues would be the best place to put that.

Thank You,

Brandon

[Anielkis Herrera]

Hello, any updates about this subject?

Thanks

[Alex Polvi]

We had intended to roll it out today in the image, but due to last minute issues had to pull it out. We will try again next week. 

-Alex

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Anielkis Herrera <anie...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello, any updates about this subject?

Thanks

--

[Brandon Kruse]

Hey Alex - did you ever get around to testing this?

I am going to try coreOS 633.1.0 with etcd 2.x inside a container starting from the cloud-init. I will be loosely following this guide:

http://www.jimmycuadra.com/posts/etcd-2-0-static-bootstrapping-on-coreos-and-vagrant

Thanks!

Brandon

[Brandon Kruse]

Just wanted to give an update. I was able to use etcd 2.0.7 with fleet on coreos 633.1.0

It looks like it's working great. I've already ran it in our development environment and put it through many different failure scenarios per the consensus algorithm and it is working like a charm.

I'll post a blog article later with step-by-steps if anyone is interested.

[Ben Marini]

Brandon I would definitely be interested. I'm considering the same setup and would love to learn from your experience.

[John Griessen]

On 03/29/2015 06:54 PM, Ben Marini wrote:
> I'm considering the same setup and would love to learn from your experience.

Me too.

[AoiK]

Hello Alex,

any update on this?
we're running etcd2.0 containers on CoreOS but it'd be easier if it came with CoreOS ISO image :)

Aoi

2015年3月19日木曜日 12時18分20秒 UTC+9 Alex Polvi:

[Jonathan Boulle]

We're shooting to have it in the alpha image within the next two weeks. Tracking bug here: https://github.com/coreos/bugs/issues/317

[Aoi Kadoya]

Great, thank you!

Aoi

2015年4月4日土曜日、Jonathan Boulle<jonatha...@coreos.com>さんは書きました: