On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 17:16 +1000, Luke Weston wrote:
> I know there is a bit of a fascination around here sometimes with
> using recycled donated junk, or buying cheap mystery stuff from
> AliBaba, and an adversity to spending the organisation's money on any
> quality infrastructure in the hopes that somebody would come along and
> donate something cheaper, but I would do it properly with a new pump,
> personally, for reliable, lasting infrastructure.
I agree. I think most of us suffer from under-valuing our own time. If
you can get it working for next to nothing in just a few hours, then
you've saved a few dollars at the expense of a few hours. That might
seem worthwhile to a student or an unemployed person, but it's not
really fair of an organisation to value its volunteers' time at zero. It
also doesn't make economic sense, since you have a limited amount of
volunteer time to make use of.
I believe the people who are most likely to pay the full membership fee
every month are often people with little time to waste on things not
working. It hurts the bottom line if we can't keep equipment working,
and so people lose interest. (Even one person, really, for how much is a
pump worth?)
I'm not saying we should splash money around. Sometimes you can easily
afford to gamble on something working, and often the educational
experience is worth a lot as well. But I remember the last time the
laser cutter went down for an extended period, and I didn't feel good
about it. It's a unique piece of equipment, and I can't think of where
I'd go if I couldn't use it.
For what it's worth, Dave has in the past said to just buy the right
items for the laser cutter. I think maybe he hasn't been approached with
a specific request.
And it is fair to see whether someone has something perfectly
serviceable, first. But as has been pointed out, the equipment is now
down because of this. The conversation has gone in the direction of
whether or not the flow rate really needs to be what it was, instead of
just keeping it how it was.
> I don't want this to be some ugly dodge looking cupcake-style messy
> science fair project where other people have come along and grafted on
> three separate external mains power supplies, all of which need to be
> plugged in and working, because this just creates more potential for
> failure and user complexity.
On the one hand, yes this creates complexity and redundancy, but on the
other, it's less likely that a short or EM interference will have a
direct effect on the internal circuitry. It's basically a modular
approach, with pros and cons.
It seems to me that the biggest problem is in documenting what the
system looks like now, as well as changes to it over time, and who made
those changes. Modularity makes it easier to add things and change
things, but if you don't occasionally turn prototypes into final
implementations, then you will end up with a mess.
If it were me, I wouldn't like to mess with the internals if they aren't
documented! So I probably would have used plug-pack power supplies too,
at least initially.
There's also the issue that there isn't an internal 12 V rail (that I
know of). We have 24 V and (I think) 36 V. So it's also a planning
issue. It's so much easier to stick a plug-pack on the side and not risk
interfering with what someone else might be doing.
> By all means give credit where credit is due, but if it's not work
> that I did then don't come to me with blame/support/responsibility -
> direct that to the persons where it is due, and I'm sure the
> appropriate persons will provide support and responsibility for the
> work.
I hope this hasn't been happening to you, Luke.
For the record, last time I had an issue in which I needed to know about
something you had done, I simply phoned you up and you emailed me a PDF
of the schematic. I had it diagnosed and fixed soon after.
Extensive documentation is nice, but we're all volunteers here. Let's
not pretend we don't have each other's mobile numbers, or that there are
problems which simply must be solved right now with guesswork, because
we don't have certain information at hand.
Creative types often find it really draining to have to stop what they
are creating, in order to update documentation. This is an additional
cost if we can't communicate verbally.
> Also, I'm not exactly sure what the best choice of biocide is, if any,
> but I don't think potassium permanganate is a good choice. Because it
> is such a strong oxidiser it will rapidly and completely be reduced by
> just about any crap that is hanging around in the environment, leaving
> a brown mud of manganese dioxide. The biocide, if any, needs to be
> insoluble and remain insoluble, and needs to not be corrosive to
> copper or any other metals that may be encountered in the plumbing.
I chose KMnO4 because:
* it is cheap and available around the corner
* it has been used as a biocide in industry
* it is effective at low concentrations
* it is (I believe) compatible with the materials in use
* it is not some proprietary unknown mixture intended for another
purpose
* it looks nice when it's still purple
I didn't have much else to base a decision on. Desperate times and all
that. The slime was winning!
I think the brown colour is slime that has been stained. If the system
were sparkling clean, it shouldn't be discoloured.
But, you know, I haven't seen it in a while. If the slime keeps winning,
then it's not very effective.
> Also, I think the water vessels need to be completely sealed from the
> outside environment, not open, to prevent dust/dirt/foreign crap
> ingress.
This isn't the main problem, however.
> Coherent has a document here on cooling water guidelines for their
> Ar/Kr ion heads (not CO2 lasers, but this is irrelevant):
Actually it is somewhat relevant. AFAIK, all of these tubes use metal
and alumina ceramic, not glass. I have heard of mildly acidic coolants
eating through ion laser tubes of the glass/ceramic type.
A CO2 tube is a lot more like a piece of laboratory glassware.
> They say that biocidal additives should be completely avoided in their
> gear, and that shortwave UV irradiation be used to prevent
> biofilm/algae/whatever growth if this is a problem. I don't know if
> there is any rationale behind that other than just chemical
> reactivity/corrosion concerns.
I've run them with whatever process coolant was supplied by my
university (propylene glycol and corrosion inhibitors). I can tell you
that the water was pink, would you like to know more? :)
Commercial coolants contain biocides.
I did contemplate using car radiator coolant, but that is toxic, and I
can foresee that we spill it everywhere.
Maybe it is time to track down and invest in some propylene glycol based
coolant, and see if it fouls up.
> Flushing all existing crap out of the primary cooling circuit, filling
> it with clean distilled water, and having it completely enclosed
> against dust ingress is probably a good place to start.
I haven't personally noticed dust being a problem. But yet another flush
with bleach, and then making it more light-tight, would probably help.
It's basically a heated aquarium at the moment, and it sits under a
window.
Maybe add a few snails, or sucker catfish? :)
Have fun,
Darren