On 7/26/17, 1:12 PM, in article
56837b93-ab2d-4dbe...@googlegroups.com, "
fr31...@gmail.com"
<
fr31...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We merely state the obvious, but GNU/Linux is the best OS for many,
> many reasons. Feel free to add to the list.
>
> The X Window GUI, with its near infinite configurability, makes
> simple yet critical tasks such as cut/copy/paste, resolution
> changes, and virtual desktops highly efficient.
Can you show a task where this helps Linux do things better?
> The many available window managers, ensuring much choice,
> is a boon to all users.
Can you show a task where this helps Linux do things better?
> The kernel is extremely configurable to ensure maximal performance
> on a variety of hardware configurations, both old and new.
For those who want to spend the time to do this, I agree. Most users,
though, are simply going to install Mint (or whatever) as is. And even then,
being able to more quickly do tasks not as well is not really much of a
benefit.
> Every software package, including the kernel, is available in all
> previous versions. Consequently, no hardware can be excluded based
> on software updates.
Running on older hardware is a benefit. Agreed. As is the price. Those are
the BIG benefits of desktop Linux.
> The native PostScript language AND separation of printing infrastructure
> from the GUI allows for superior printed output.
Can you show this? When Owl and I worked on his printing (to PDF) of many
recipes it turned out his solution did not have the resulting PDF with text
one could easily select and right click on (or whatever) to look up words or
cross text out or whatever. Would LOVE to see examples of what you are
saying and show why you think it is better.
> The ability to compile all software from source can produce SIGNIFICANT
> improvement in speed.
You talked about compiling for your own hardware, above. Yes, for some that
is a benefit... but, again, being faster at being less efficient is not
really a bragging point.
> The kernel provides a variety of I/O schedulers to suit different
> storage systems and loads.
Can you show some examples on the desktop where this is a benefit?
> To be continued.
As you do so, I would appreciate it if you answered this question:
What desktop tasks does Linux handle better than the competition?
So far the answers seem to be:
* Repositories
* Copy on select (which you mention, above)
* Faster file operations (you touch on speed issues, above)
* Excellent CLI environment(s)
The first of which is to deal with weaknesses of installing but IS a good
feature (but the competition has their own now) and the second of which is,
at best, a mixed bag. The third is going to depend on a LOT of variables,
but Ext4, at the very least, seems to handle that well (though plenty of
claims of it having poor encryption). The final one is very important to a
tiny fraction of desktop users but, of course, generally the idea of a
desktop implies the GUI these days... still, the value of a good CLI should
not be dismissed.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<
https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>