On 9/24/17, 5:55 AM, in article Jeff-R...@Sep.24--5.55am.Seattle.2017,
Looking up "Steve Carroll" I do not see much bad. I did try looking up what
he has shown to be his real name: "Steven Petruzzellis".
Good grief... their Google Seeding is pretty nasty!
But at least Sandman insists that he is not hurt by the flooding in ANY way.
His own flooding. It is not as if he and Carroll are even hiding the fact it
is them. Heck, Carroll is posting scripts showing how he an auto-post, and
Sandman has been used automated trolling with his "digest" posts for years.
And I admit I have been baiting them some recently to see how screwed up
their claims are. Completely inconsistent... here are just some (your
comments reference what I list as "CLAIM 1":
CLAIM 1: The flooding targets them (uses their names more than mine) which
proves the flooder is doing it to harm them.
BUT! The flooding is causing them NO harm at all. They both just
block it.
CLAIM 2: At least one of Carroll's accounts is under my control (somehow).
BUT! That same account is being used to email people to privately
ask them to cause me harm (lie about me publicly).
CLAIM 3: They are not the ones doing the flooding.
BUT! They have control of the flooding and can change who it
mentions and what it says.
CLAIM 4: The person the accuse of their flooding is completely incompetent
when it comes to scripting.
BUT! The person they accuse is somehow doing the flooding which
requires scripting skills shown only by Sandman and Carroll.
CLAIM 5: The person they blame has not even made it to "step 1" in figuring
out how they do their flooding.
BUT! The person they blame for the flooding clearly has good
knowledge of JavaScript, DOM, scripting in general, and more.
CLAIM 6: The person doing the automated flooding is doing it manually even
though that is not possible given the amount of flooding.
BUT!: Oh... no "BUT" needed... the claim is just idiocy to try and
solve the issues with their other idiotic claims. :)
CLAIM 7: The flooding is done to "satisfy [the flooder's] narcissistic rage.
BUT!: No "BUT" needed... this is as good of an explanation as to any
as to why Carroll and Sandman are doing the flooding.
> Michael is butt hurt, insane, in a snit, and "galloping",
> just like his "From:" line says.
>
> Googling "Michael Glasser" returns nothing relevant;
> "Michael Glasser Yavapai College" returns:
>
>
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5tdzGdBGGp8/8595e
> hcPCwAJ
>
>
https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-b7075a23/
>
> "Professor in the Computer Science department"
>
http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1163496
>
> A student review ( Jan 2009 ): "He might be an insane genius.".
> ( Feb 2009 ): "sometimes he is rushed because of having panic attacks."
> ( March 2009 ): <<
>
> The material covered is hard and should be
> worth more than the 2 credits that are awarded.
>
> Mr. Glasser provides very good video tutorials
> which walk you trough everything you need to know.
> The book is not even needed.
>
> He does miss class more than he should
> but responds to pleas for help very quickly
> and offers excellent help. >>
You also find the fake reviews of one of my businesses -- added by Carroll
and others from COLA. Heck, you will even find Sandman's site where he lies
about me, as well as Carroll's list of obsessively scavenged and forged
quotes. And more... but I will not point to it.
The fact Sandman and Carroll's non-stop Google seeding of me has caused harm
is not in doubt in any way. They have been doing it for over a decade. Maybe
now they are trying to prove that their Google seeding causes no harm (might
be needed if I ever try to sue them for it) by seeding Google with their own
names? Maybe they are willing to be harmed by their trolling to try to frame
me, given that after a decade of trolling they cannot find any significant
wrong from me?
Or maybe Sandman is just freaking out over how after a decade of his lying I
finally spent some time to focus on something inconsequential to me but
STILL ripping him apart... the fact the following CSS is invalid:
<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">
Really, is that worth him having a decade-long "narcissistic rage", as
Carroll calls it?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<
https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>