10054 or 10057 errors with Eudora and MDaemon
Daniel Jacobson
>
>I'm having problems retrieving mail from MDaemon 2.74 beta G via
>Eudora 3.0.3 (16).
>
>The scenario is:
>
> - "Check Mail" triggered manually or by timer
> - Eudora goes through userid/password (PASS/STAT) sequence
> successfully
> - Eudora goes through "Collecting mail information (UIDL)" to
> TOP 1101 1, then fails with 10054 or 10057 (varies) error
>
>My guess is that there's a problem when the number of mail messages
>exceeds 200-300. The problem is intermittent at that point, but
>becomes a permanent failure above that number.
>
>My guess is there's a timing problem between MDaemon and Eudora's mail
>transfer protocol negotiation.
>
>This occurs under both WinSock 21f or IBM WARP 3's PPP dialer.
>
>No problems noted when accessing news or web server during same
>session.
>
>Mail access to a lower-volume account on the same server during the
>same session succeeds without error. Mail retrieval from another ISP
>via Eudora in the same session succeeds without error. Mail is
>retrieved successfully when using another e-mail client (ConnectSoft).
>
>Various methods of "Determine last read message" and settings for
>"Asynchronous WinSock calls" have been tried to no avail.
>
>I've altered WinSock 21f's session parameters from MTU=1500, MIN=5880,
>and MSS=1460 to MTU=576, RMIN=2144, and MSS=536 to no avail.
>
>My ISP (The Internet Connection) has been unable to diagnose the
>problem further.
[Uncrossposted]
Try:
XSLF The cream of the crop - Eudora error messages and fixes
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/avenue/rcm01/eerror.htm
--
Over and Out
Daniel Jacobson
Michael Oujesky
Already read and attempted. Bu then you'd know that of you'd read the
paragraph on WINSOCK parameter changes and compared that to the
reference you provided.
Could you please be a bit more helpful and less self-important?
Thanks.
On 2 Aug 1998 18:07:42 GMT, in comp.mail.eudora.ms-windows you wrote:
>
> Try:
> XSLF The cream of the crop - Eudora error messages and fixes
> http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/avenue/rcm01/eerror.htm
> --
> Over and Out
> Daniel Jacobson
>
>
>
>
>
>
John Tubbs
providing a URL demonstrate self-importance?
John
Michael Oujesky
Go read the reference pointed to and then my original post.
I believe you'll find that the specific circumstances were reviewed
and the indicated corrective action taken. (See the section on
WinSock parameters.)
My apologies to any and all that were offended.
But when a respondent posts a reply that displays no understanding of
the reference provided and it's lack of applicability to the stated
set of circumstances experienced and testing already done, my
perception is that the respondent is merely trying to impress, not
assist.
If this is the type of "help" to expect from here (ill considered
responses), then perhaps this newsgroup is not what I was expecting at
all.
Until next time...
John Tubbs
Michael Oujesky wrote:
>
> If this is the type of "help" to expect from here (ill considered
> responses), then perhaps this newsgroup is not what I was expecting at
> all.
>
> >Your attitude isn't going to get you much help in this newsgroup. How does
> >providing a URL demonstrate self-importance?
> >
Michael Oujesky
Hmmm, thanks for the information.
I'll forward this to my ISP and see how they respond.
Thanks again very much, I do appreciate the assistance.
>Looking thru my old mail, here is a response I got back thru my ISP's
>technical support when I got some similar messages a while ago.
>Don't know if this applies in your case?
>
>Over and Out
>Daniel Jacobson
>
>START *****
>At 10:00 PM 12/11/97 -0600, you wrote:
>> Since last night 12-10-97 after 18:00, I have been experiencing problems
>> with the mail server. I receive Message 1 most of the time, sometimes
>> followed by Messages 2, 3, and 4. (See attachments)
>>
>> Message 1 - There has been an error transferring your mail. I said:
>> PASS <shhhh! Don't tell anyone.>
>> and then the POP server []
>said:
>> ERR you must wait 113 seconds more before accessing
>> the server again.
>> Message 2 - Error 10054
>> Message 3 - Error 10004
>> Message 4 - Error 10057
>
>We have put a restriction on the POP server--if you check mail more than 2
>times within 60 seconds, it will generate an error and prevent you from
>checking mail for 120 seconds (last night it was just once every 30
>seconds).
>
>
Michael Oujesky
My apologies for the harsh response.
As partial explanation, I've had many know-it-all's post an officious
response without even reading the details of the post to see how their
comments either do not apply or were considered and details in the
post clarify the outcome of testing for them.
I do appreciate your later post. It should help out with resolving my
problem.
Thanks again.
At 12:22 AM 8/3/98 -0500, you wrote:
>[Mailed Only]
>
>At 11:05 PM 8/2/98 GMT, Michael Oujesky wrote:
>>
>> Already read and attempted. But then you'd know that of you read the
>> paragraph on WINSOCK parameter changes.
>>
>> Could you please be a bit more helpful
>
> That's what I was trying to do.
>
>> and less self-important?
>
> I certainly hope not, that has never been my intentions.
>
> Sorry, but I try to help and answer questions here on my own time
> on a dialy basis. I admit, I do not research each and every question
> to a fine detail. I give my possbile solution of things to TRY, and a
> URLs for known resources.
>
> Sorry if you still have a problem, if I knew the solution I would post it.
>
> This newsgroup is not official tech support. It is also not sponsored
> by Qualcomm. However, there are a many knowledgeable people who
> read and post in this newsgroup, and someone may be able to offer you
> some worthwhile advice. Your milage may vary.
>
> Everyone here is an unpaid volunteer. It's users helping users. You
> are not helping your case any by slamming the people who may be able to
> help you. If someone knows of a possible solution they will reply to
> your post.
>
> So. if you do get a workable solution to your problem from this newsgroup,
> are you planning to stay and contribrite to help others, like you want
> others to do for you?
>
> Chill Out a little, Please.
> Over and Out
> Daniel Jacobson
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On 2 Aug 1998 18:07:42 GMT, in comp.mail.eudora.ms-windows you wrote:
>> >
>> > Try:
>> > XSLF The cream of the crop - Eudora error messages and fixes
>> > http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/avenue/rcm01/eerror.htm
>> > --
>> > Over and Out
>> > Daniel Jacobson
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >In article
><D20400FED9D1EF8D.C67232EA...@library-proxy.airnews.ne
>> > [Uncrossposted]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>