jonas.t...@gmail.com wrote on 19 Aug 2017 in comp.lang.javascript:
>> ===============
>>
>> Then perhaps you could tell me what this means:
>>
>> "How about this Evertjan an exchange,"
>>
>> Are you trying to exchange me for someone else? Like yourself perhaps?
>
> No i tell you that you will have something to gain doing the thing you
> are doing the best being trivial.
Well, Your concept of what you tell me being logical is flawed.
>> ===============
>>
>> "help me with trivialities of javascript semantics"
>>
>> If your Qs are so trivial to you, why do you post them, anyway?
>>
>
> However trivial a task may be it can still be time consuming,
So you need help of experts?
> picking nuts for example.
Being nuts?
>> "I will automatically compress any string content you put into it
>> without
>
>> need for an algorithm because the tree itself is compressed."
>>
>> Why would you need to do that compressing yourself?
>
> No that would be the tree structure holding any content,
You said you would compress that "automatically",
probably meaning "without thinking"?
> like your ramblings.
I am honoured you like them.
But why should a tree-structure contain ramblings?
>> Couldn't you write programme-code to do that for you?
>>
>> And how can you yourself [or a programme you write] compress something
>> without a compression algoritm, whether or not a tree is compressed?
>
> Well that is because i am smart the tree creating algorithm is the
> compression. So when the data read into the tree it is already
> compressed. That is how smart i am.
>
>>
>> What is a compressed tree anyway? Wood-pulp?
>
> You know perfectly well what a data tree structure is.
>
>> And why this urge to compress string-content,
>> [I see no difference between een string and its content, btw]
>> is it an exsistential urge?
>
> Well that you have problem with concepts that may or may not be trivial
> is not my problem, urge i do not know... sometimes i just feel like
> doing a little script. I like puzzels, especially if i make them myself.
>
>> ================
>>
>> I know you are font of endless monologues on this NG,
>> which most of us just skip,
>> but why not wait for answers from others than yourself,
>> this NG not being your personal blog but a discussion-group.
>> and answer clarifying questions,
>> even when you feel that is just a courtesy?
>
> I would think i know you people at this NG very good with the semantics
> of programming language albeit a bit picky and anal about it. My
> question is a no brainer with a yes or no answer.
Okay, so my answer is: "yes or no!".
> And i know that
> probably all of you know the answer to it,
You would first have to clarify your question.
> but you are just acting in
> contempt over my pitiful projects.
Well, I don't condone in your self-pity, without contempt.
> The strange thing is you can produce text that add up to nothing but
> can't produce a single yes or no.
So you are just interested in any textual answer, without meaning?
Okay, so my [second] answer is: "yes or no!".