TRUMP oh yeahehaheah!!!!

[polymorph self]

perhaps forth can become part of the Trump movement!

dept defense using g144!

[menti...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, November 10, 2016 at 9:05:43 PM UTC-8, polymorph self wrote:
> perhaps forth can become part of the Trump movement!
>
> dept defense using g144!

It is unthinkable that a sexual predator like Donald "Grab 'em by the pussy" Trump will actually take office, even after stealing the election from the winner of the popular vote. There is such a storm of nationwide protest coming that the Trump University Swindler-in-Chief may well find some excuse for disappearing permanently from public life.

[polymorph self]

You are Mixing Donald Trump up with some sex predator.
Donald J Trump had many women competing for him.
Melania his wife si now the most beautful first lady of all time.
His family is wonderful.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCt8e-xmRqM
Your miseducation in philosophy can be repaired.
Watch Yaron Brook.
Trump won fairly despite the TV etc.
He also won the popular vote, although thats irrelevant.
Remember Democracy is evil.
Property and free trade aka capitalism are GOOD.
Socialism always fails.
CApitalism made USA no 1 in 1800s and Hong Kong #2 in 1900s.
Hong Kong had 15% flat tax on consumption, private property, and free trade.
No government help.
No welfare state.
Remember USA is far higher standard of living than Sweden/denmark/germany/japan
We live better in bigger houses with better medical.
You have much to learn!

[WJ]

menti...@gmail.com wrote:

> It is unthinkable that a sexual
> predator like Donald "Grab 'em by
> the pussy" Trump will actually take
> office,

Liar.

Many, if not most, men talk that way in locker rooms. Not being a man,
you wouldn't know that.

Clinton, who is apparently a serial rapist, has already
held office.

Why aren't you whining about that? You have no morals
and no honesty whatsoever.

> even after stealing the
> election from the winner of the
> popular vote.

The powers that be used massive vote-fraud against Trump.
It has been well known for years that vote-scamming
is common in America.

> There is such a storm
> of nationwide protest coming

"nationwide"? The USA is obviously not a nation.
A nation is composed of people who are genetically
similar.

"I would hesitate to describe America as a nation at all in 1997, because it is
something very different: a polyethnic federation administered by a single
ruling class.... [T]he accumulated rot in America has now reached a point
where the pillars of society itself are failing." --- Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Most of the protesting will be orchestrated by Jews.

"Jews totally run Hollywood.... But I don't care if Americans think we're
running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care
that we get to keep running them." --- Joel Stein
articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19
archive.org/download/DavidDukeTv/DoJewsControlTheMediaTheLaTimesSaysYes.flv

"They agitate for "equality" to facilitate the imposition of their own
immeasurable superiority, and for "economic justice" to mask their conviction
that all the property in the world justly belongs to them.... They denounce
"racism" and agitate for "human rights," with the secret reservation that they
are the only race that is human." --- R. P. Oliver

"Goyim were born only to serve us.... They will work, they will plow, they
will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat." --- Rabbi Ovadia Yosef
web.archive.org/web/20101020044210/http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=191782
archive.org/download/DavidDuke_videos/TopRabbiExposesJewishRacism-cybsdwjezqi.ogv

"[T]he organized Jewish community throughout the West has been a major force in
placing penalties on speech related to race, ethnicity, and immigration."
www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/03/could-it-happen-here/

"I think that we have to remember that the real activists who are doing this are
motivated not by love for humanity ... ; they are motivated by hatred for the
traditional people and culture of America ... [and] the traditional people and
culture of the European countries." ---
www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/09/RIR-140929.php

"Here Levy is in effect saying: Jewish ethnocentrism is the opposite of
ethnocentrism. Hence, Jewish ethnocentrism is supremely good, whereas every
other ethnocentrism is supremely bad."
theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/02/bernard-henri-levy-on-wars-and-anti-nationalism-its-judaism-stupid

"What is coming is the complete triumph of Jewish ideas,
before which, sentiments of humanity, the thirst for truth,
Christian feelings, and the national and popular pride of
Europe must bow. And what will be in the future is known also
to the Jews themselves: Their reign is approaching, their
complete reign! ..."
"The Jews look forward to world domination. This requires them to maintain
their own close-knit identity. If the Jews are given equal legal rights in
Russia, but are allowed to keep their 'State within a State,' they would be
more privileged than the Russians. The consequences of this situation are
already clear in Europe."
-- Fyodor Dostoyevsky, "Diary Of A Writer," 1877.

"[A]n unholy alliance of leftists, capitalists, and Zionist supremacists has
schemed to promote immigration and miscegenation with the deliberate aim of
breeding us out of existence in our own homelands.... [T]he real aim stays the
same: the biggest genocide in human history...." --- Nick Griffin
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0hD7IffTJs)

"When I was a Revolutionary Marxist, we were all in favour of as much
immigration as possible. It wasn't because we liked immigrants, but because we
didn't like Britain."
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2301743/How-invasion-immigrants-corner-England-mockery-PMs-promise-close-door.html

"A Jew always has a much higher soul than a gentile, even if he is a
homosexual," he [Israel's Deputy Defense Minister Eli Ben-Dahan] said.
theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/10/israeli-minister-latest-in-long-line-of-jews-asserting-the-inferiority-of-non-jews

"Jewish drug dealers, child porn pushers, and slave traders are free
from prosecution in Israel. Israel does not consider these to be
crimes ... so long as the victims are non-Jews."
www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2009/08/the-culture-of-deceit/

"I don't believe in western morality, i.e. don't kill civilians or children....
The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites.
Kill men, women and children (and cattle)." --- Rabbi Manis Friedman
web.archive.org/web/20090605154706/http://www.momentmag.com/Exclusive/2009/2009-06/200906-Ask_Rabbis.html
archive.org/download/DavidDukeVideo/TheZionistMatrixOfPowerddhd.ogv

"Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the
last century.... They are now going into a multicultural mode. Jews will be
resented because of our leading role." --- Barbara Spectre
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0hD7IffTJs)

--
There was a man who loved the Japanese, and there was another who hated them
and wanted to inflict genocide on them. One of these men became absolute
dictator of Japan and flooded the nation with Negroid and Semitic "refugees".
Which man became the dictator?

[polymorph self]

On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 12:05:43 AM UTC-5, polymorph self wrote:
> perhaps forth can become part of the Trump movement!
>
> dept defense using g144!

unregulated housing
thorium clean atomic
no corporate or payroll tax
no income tax
no house tax
www.fairtax.org

[rickman]

On 11/12/2016 6:01 PM, WJ wrote:
> menti...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> It is unthinkable that a sexual
>> predator like Donald "Grab 'em by
>> the pussy" Trump will actually take
>> office,
>
> Liar.
>
> Many, if not most, men talk that way in locker rooms. Not being a man,
> you wouldn't know that.

Uh, what Trump talked about was not just "locker room" talk of what he
*wanted* to do to women, but what he *had* done to women. BIG
difference. Many women have already come out to accuse him of exactly
these criminal acts.

> Clinton, who is apparently a serial rapist, has already
> held office.
>
> Why aren't you whining about that? You have no morals
> and no honesty whatsoever.

If he is a rapist, why hasn't he been charged? Trump has been accused
and my well end up facing charges, but they have to be filed before he
takes office. Otherwise it has to be handled by Congress.

>> even after stealing the
>> election from the winner of the
>> popular vote.
>
> The powers that be used massive vote-fraud against Trump.
> It has been well known for years that vote-scamming
> is common in America.

Really? Why is it there is no evidence? If there is evidence, why has
nothing been done to charge those who are guilty? I expect you will
talk about how the conspiracy is too big... funny how it didn't result
in Hillary winning...

>> There is such a storm
>> of nationwide protest coming
>
> "nationwide"? The USA is obviously not a nation.
> A nation is composed of people who are genetically
> similar.

???

> "I would hesitate to describe America as a nation at all in 1997, because it is
> something very different: a polyethnic federation administered by a single
> ruling class.... [T]he accumulated rot in America has now reached a point
> where the pillars of society itself are failing." --- Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
>
> Most of the protesting will be orchestrated by Jews.

Oh yes, I forgot how insane you are...

<insane ranting snipped>

Ok, now that I remembered how insane you are, I'll go back to ignoring
you. Rant away...

Are you planning to show us your manifesto?

--

Rick C

[Rod Pemberton]

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:01:36 -0500
rickman <gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/12/2016 6:01 PM, WJ wrote:
> > menti...@gmail.com wrote:

> >> It is unthinkable that a sexual
> >> predator like Donald "Grab 'em by
> >> the pussy" Trump will actually take
> >> office,
> >
> > Liar.
> >
> > Many, if not most, men talk that way in locker rooms. Not being a
> > man, you wouldn't know that.
>
> Uh, what Trump talked about was not just "locker room" talk of what
> he *wanted* to do to women, but what he *had* done to women. BIG
> difference. Many women have already come out to accuse him of
> exactly these criminal acts.
>

If I had said much the same in regards to Bill Clinton, and I do
believe that I could justifiably say the EXACT same thing about Bill
Clinton, you (and any other liberal or progressive for that matter)
would say:

1) it was just boastful talk
2) there is no proof he has done anything
3) his accusers are liars and profiteers
4) he's not a criminal until charged and found guilty
5) he's the victim of a vast conspiracy from the opposite side

So, I don't believe there is any real point to your counter-point to
WJ. You're entitled to your opinion, but it's bigoted and
hypocritical, since you don't also find fault with Bill Clinton for the
exact same thing.

> > Clinton, who is apparently a serial rapist, has already
> > held office.
> >
> > Why aren't you whining about that? You have no morals
> > and no honesty whatsoever.
>
> If he is a rapist, why hasn't he been charged?

Conservatives would say, "cover-up." Liberals would say, "debunked" or
"no evidence."

> Trump has been accused

And, Bill Clinton has numerous accusers too. Why do you believe
Trump's accusers, but not Clinton's? That would seem to be the key
issue here. Even Hillary, who is widely believed to have been involved
in numerous sex scandal cover-ups for Bill, said, "“I want to send a
message to every survivor of sexual assault: Don’t let anyone silence
your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be
believed, and we’re with you.” Of course, in an apparent admission of
her guilt, Hillary's campaign removed those words when a few Bill's
past accusers came out of the woodwork.

> >> even after stealing the
> >> election from the winner of the
> >> popular vote.
> >
> > The powers that be used massive vote-fraud against Trump.
> > It has been well known for years that vote-scamming
> > is common in America.
>
> Really? Why is it there is no evidence?

The media wanted Hillary to win so badly, that the media repeatedly
made the following false claims:

1) Hillary was in the lead by a wide or substantial margin
2) Hillary's rallies weren't empty, but packed
3) Trump had almost no path to victory
4) Hillary had the minority vote and millennial vote
5) Trump supporters were ignorant, blue-collar workers

It can be reasonably argued that the overwhelming expectation that
Hillary would win suppressed Trump voter turnout, i.e., giving them no
reason to vote when Trump was so far behind. Now, to be fair, I also
happen to believe that the media lies also suppressed Hillary voter
turnout too, i.e., giving them no reason to vote when she was so far in
the lead. Personally, I think Hillary may have won without the media
interference, even with some additional voters supporting Trump. The
numbers of potential voters are heavily on her side, like 8% more.

Given the media suppression of voters, I believe that the "Comey
effect" boosted Trump's voters and reduced Hillary's, but that Trump
still would've won without the "Comey effect," albeit just barely.

> If there is evidence, why
> has nothing been done to charge those who are guilty? I expect you
> will talk about how the conspiracy is too big... funny how it didn't
> result in Hillary winning...

As stated above, I think Hillary might've won, under the correct
circumstances.

> >> There is such a storm
> >> of nationwide protest coming
> >
> > "nationwide"? The USA is obviously not a nation.
> > A nation is composed of people who are genetically
> > similar.
>
> ???

Does WJ hail from Germany? e.g., Nazi's wanted a pure race nation.

> > "I would hesitate to describe America as a nation at all in 1997,
> > because it is something very different: a polyethnic federation
> > administered by a single ruling class.... [T]he accumulated rot in
> > America has now reached a point where the pillars of society itself
> > are failing." --- Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
> >
> > Most of the protesting will be orchestrated by Jews.
>
> Oh yes, I forgot how insane you are...

The billionaire George Soros is a Jew. He is known to instigate
revolutions which have actually overthrown governments. I'm not sure
whom the other Jews are to which WJ is referring, but you can find many
wealthy Jews in U.S. industries like media, newspapers, Hollywood, and
diamonds. So, it's really not so far fetched that this is just
conspiracy talk. Are some of the other billionaires who supported
Hillary Jewish? Yes, they are. Of the billionaire's listed by Fortune
as supporting Hillary, six out of twelve (or 50%) are Jewish: George
Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Seth Klarman, Haim Saban,
and J.B. Pritzker. Now, I'm not saying any of this to promote hatred or
anti-Semitism, as just as many non-Jewish billionaires supported
Hillary in that article, but clearly, you must admit that there is some
trivial correlation. Only 2.2% of the U.S. population is Jewish.


Rod Pemberton

[rickman]

On 11/14/2016 1:49 AM, Rod Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:01:36 -0500
> rickman <gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/12/2016 6:01 PM, WJ wrote:
>>> menti...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>>> It is unthinkable that a sexual
>>>> predator like Donald "Grab 'em by
>>>> the pussy" Trump will actually take
>>>> office,
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>> Many, if not most, men talk that way in locker rooms. Not being a
>>> man, you wouldn't know that.
>>
>> Uh, what Trump talked about was not just "locker room" talk of what
>> he *wanted* to do to women, but what he *had* done to women. BIG
>> difference. Many women have already come out to accuse him of
>> exactly these criminal acts.
>>
>
> If I had said much the same in regards to Bill Clinton,

So you acknowledge that if these things are true about Trump he is a
criminal?

> and I do
> believe that I could justifiably say the EXACT same thing about Bill
> Clinton, you (and any other liberal or progressive for that matter)
> would say:
>
> 1) it was just boastful talk
> 2) there is no proof he has done anything
> 3) his accusers are liars and profiteers
> 4) he's not a criminal until charged and found guilty
> 5) he's the victim of a vast conspiracy from the opposite side
>
> So, I don't believe there is any real point to your counter-point to
> WJ. You're entitled to your opinion, but it's bigoted and
> hypocritical, since you don't also find fault with Bill Clinton for the
> exact same thing.

Why bring up Bill Clinton when discussion Trump? I don't think there is
anything about Bill Clinton that is relevant to Trump. If there is a
connection I missed it.

>>> Clinton, who is apparently a serial rapist, has already
>>> held office.
>>>
>>> Why aren't you whining about that? You have no morals
>>> and no honesty whatsoever.
>>
>> If he is a rapist, why hasn't he been charged?
>
> Conservatives would say, "cover-up." Liberals would say, "debunked" or
> "no evidence."

Who would be covering it up? Don't you think there are plenty of people
in power who would love to bring down Bill Clinton? If there was
evidence why are his enemies so inept in bringing it to the forefront?

>> Trump has been accused
>
> And, Bill Clinton has numerous accusers too. Why do you believe
> Trump's accusers, but not Clinton's? That would seem to be the key
> issue here. Even Hillary, who is widely believed to have been involved
> in numerous sex scandal cover-ups for Bill, said, "“I want to send a
> message to every survivor of sexual assault: Don’t let anyone silence
> your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be
> believed, and we’re with you.” Of course, in an apparent admission of
> her guilt, Hillary's campaign removed those words when a few Bill's
> past accusers came out of the woodwork.

You keep changing the topic. Bill Clinton is not relevant to Trump.
Stick to the topic. So are you saying Trump should be prosecuted if
there is evidence?

>>>> even after stealing the
>>>> election from the winner of the
>>>> popular vote.
>>>
>>> The powers that be used massive vote-fraud against Trump.
>>> It has been well known for years that vote-scamming
>>> is common in America.
>>
>> Really? Why is it there is no evidence?
>
> The media wanted Hillary to win so badly, that the media repeatedly
> made the following false claims:
>
> 1) Hillary was in the lead by a wide or substantial margin
> 2) Hillary's rallies weren't empty, but packed
> 3) Trump had almost no path to victory
> 4) Hillary had the minority vote and millennial vote
> 5) Trump supporters were ignorant, blue-collar workers

Most of this was opinion rather than fact, so it is not surprising they
were wrong? As to the factual statements, what rallies were "empty"?
Why do you say Hillary Clinton didn't have the minority vote?

Some of this is not really worth discussing because if you really
believe Hillary Clinton did not had the minority vote, for example, you
have to be in denial.

None of this is vote fraud. Can you stick to the topic?

> It can be reasonably argued that the overwhelming expectation that
> Hillary would win suppressed Trump voter turnout, i.e., giving them no
> reason to vote when Trump was so far behind. Now, to be fair, I also
> happen to believe that the media lies also suppressed Hillary voter
> turnout too, i.e., giving them no reason to vote when she was so far in
> the lead. Personally, I think Hillary may have won without the media
> interference, even with some additional voters supporting Trump. The
> numbers of potential voters are heavily on her side, like 8% more.
>
> Given the media suppression of voters, I believe that the "Comey
> effect" boosted Trump's voters and reduced Hillary's, but that Trump
> still would've won without the "Comey effect," albeit just barely.

What is your point regarding all this?

You have drifted completely off topic though. My comment was in reply
to "The powers that be used massive vote-fraud against Trump." Do you
know anything about this?

>> If there is evidence, why
>> has nothing been done to charge those who are guilty? I expect you
>> will talk about how the conspiracy is too big... funny how it didn't
>> result in Hillary winning...
>
> As stated above, I think Hillary might've won, under the correct
> circumstances.

What does that have to do with the alleged "conspiracy"? Are you
suggesting it is clear there was *no* conspiracy?

>>>> There is such a storm
>>>> of nationwide protest coming
>>>
>>> "nationwide"? The USA is obviously not a nation.
>>> A nation is composed of people who are genetically
>>> similar.
>>
>> ???
>
> Does WJ hail from Germany? e.g., Nazi's wanted a pure race nation.

I don't know where WJ is from, but he is clearly a racist and to such an
extent that I expect he is not all there. To be so phobic about a group
of people who display no real threat is clearly paranoia.

>>> "I would hesitate to describe America as a nation at all in 1997,
>>> because it is something very different: a polyethnic federation
>>> administered by a single ruling class.... [T]he accumulated rot in
>>> America has now reached a point where the pillars of society itself
>>> are failing." --- Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
>>>
>>> Most of the protesting will be orchestrated by Jews.
>>
>> Oh yes, I forgot how insane you are...
>
> The billionaire George Soros is a Jew. He is known to instigate
> revolutions which have actually overthrown governments.

Uh, the fact that one Jew does anything in particular does not establish
anything remotely like a link between the Jews as a group and that act.

> I'm not sure
> whom the other Jews are to which WJ is referring, but you can find many
> wealthy Jews in U.S. industries like media, newspapers, Hollywood, and
> diamonds.

I believe you can also find many wealthy Catholics, Protestants and
atheists. What's your point?

> So, it's really not so far fetched that this is just
> conspiracy talk.

Yes, it is. If you can't see that you have to be deluded or an idiot.
Really? You can't see there is no Jewish conspiracy?

> Are some of the other billionaires who supported
> Hillary Jewish? Yes, they are. Of the billionaire's listed by Fortune
> as supporting Hillary, six out of twelve (or 50%) are Jewish: George
> Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Seth Klarman, Haim Saban,
> and J.B. Pritzker. Now, I'm not saying any of this to promote hatred or
> anti-Semitism, as just as many non-Jewish billionaires supported
> Hillary in that article, but clearly, you must admit that there is some
> trivial correlation. Only 2.2% of the U.S. population is Jewish.

I find it interesting that you feel Clinton does not have minority
support and yet you claim some sort of conspiracy by a minority group to
get her elected??? So which is it, no minority support or a huge
minority support?

The fact that members of a minority group who have money money supported
the Presidential candidate who was not a racist and critical of many
minority groups is not at all surprising. Why can't you see that.
There is no conspiracy, it is just common sense that minorities were
largely opposed to Trump. Same with women, Trump did very poorly with
most women because of all the things he said about them and the way he
treated women.

I'm not going to continue to debate these things with you. If you
really believe even half of what you have written, you are very much out
of touch with reality and nothing I can say will change that.

--

Rick C

[Rod Pemberton]

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 02:29:33 -0500
rickman <gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you really believe even half of what you have written, you are
> very much out of touch with reality and nothing I can say will
> change that.

Clearly, I'm not out of touch with reality as the party I believed
would come to power did so, for the reasons I believed they would.
I didn't post that here. I posted a few posts on alt.os.development
on this, and many anonymous posts to online comments sections of news
articles of a business magazine. All the Democrats, liberals,
progressives, and left-leaning independents in the comments were in
complete denial about reality. Any attempts to get them to comprehend
the truth were met with rejection. Apparently, as you exhibit, they
still are in denial and reject the truth.

FYI, I'm an independent. Technically, I'm a Libertarian, but I don't
vote as such or affiliate with Libertarian groups. The term
"independent" can include others like centrists, moderates, and
authoritarians. I'm not a Republican or Democrat as roughly half of my
political beliefs correspond to each party. I'm conservative for some
issues and liberal for others. Overall, I tend to be slightly more
conservative than liberal. As such, I would argue I have a balanced
viewpoint.


Rod Pemberton

[rickman]

I'm not disputing if your viewpoint is "balanced" or not. I'm disputing
that it is rational.

--

Rick C

[menti...@gmail.com]

Mentifex issues Stop-Trump Directive #2016-11-14

The rednecks have spoken. Get out your
Redneck Decoder Ring and follow this
Lone Wolf Directive to the letter:

21374 95634 22749 16968 78569 96330 74736
95308 34901 11924 51047 32539 24803 34267
40488 47925 85566 73711 83432 27164 52446
25941 81861 67410 03319 74885 66557 97920

[polymorph self]

lol
CNN lies 100%

[JUERGEN]

Get back to the good old American habits as you loved it -
A good shootout will solve it - 50 % dead
- and hopefully polymorph is somewhere in the crossfire and gets extinguished.
300 million reduced to 150 million - a lot of space then for all other nations to grab a bit.

[polymorph self]

guns save lives!
government has no right to tell people not to have guns
thank the gods usa exists
you pussies should tell your government no
citizen have right to protect themselves from violent shitheads

[polymorph self]

On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 12:49:59 PM UTC-5, JUERGEN wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udan3dllTyk

[Rob Sciuk]

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, JUERGEN wrote:

> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:49:54 -0800 (PST)
> From: JUERGEN <epld...@aol.com>
> Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
> Subject: Re: TRUMP oh yeahehaheah!!!!

Juergen, I would advise restraint in dealing with trolls. Kharmic
dissonance notwithstanding, it simply gives them another justification to
post their nonsense. Not only that, re-read what you posted, and tell me
that you would propose such a thing in the absence of a certain troll?

Cheers,
Rob.