I'm trying to identify a font for which I only have a short sample. I've
tried various sites that identify fonts by asking a series of questions
about the letter forms but have drawn a blank.
The most obvious characteristic is the W with crossed central vertex.
It is a solid geometric sans-serif font, a book font NOT a decorative
font. Light and slightly oblique.
W - central vertex crosses like overlapping VV
(e.g. Garamond Antiqua but sans-serif)
Q - tail joins loop without crossing it
P - Gap where bowl meets vertical
U - no stem
3 - curved
4 - closed
i - square dot
M - mid vertex on baseline
g - single storey
a - double storey
Can anyone identify this?
No.
Think about trying to identify a person uniquely with a verbal
description (blue eyes, brown hair, aquiline nose, high cheekbones,etc.)
You can post a link to an image here, or post an image or link in
alt.binaries.fonts. Then you ARE very likely to get a fairly quick
identification.
- Character
Character wrote:
Aw, c'mon, C. It wasn't that hard. Eras is the family. The weight is
whatever it is.
> Aw, c'mon, C. It wasn't that hard. Eras is the family. The weight is
> whatever it is.
ACK- An easy one. Sans-serif, crossed W, slightly slanted.
What else do you need ;-)
Andreas
I guess that some people have better verbal interpretation skills than
others! (Do you suppose THAT's why I don't understand my wife?)
In fact, I assumed it WASN'T Eras, because the OP said
"I've tried various sites that identify fonts by asking a series of
questions about the letter forms but have drawn a blank."
And I had taken the OP's information into identifont, and it came up
with ITC Eras.
- C
Sorry, I did look for posting guidelines but only found Norm Walsh's
comp.fonts FAQ, which I've read many years ago and I didn't recall it
containing any posting guidelines. Thanks for the tip.
>>>
>>> - Character
>>
>>
>> Aw, c'mon, C. It wasn't that hard. Eras is the family. The weight
>> is whatever it is.
Thanks, Eras Light is a match. A related word in a logo uses Eras bold,
which doesn't have a crossed W, I think this threw me off track.
> I guess that some people have better verbal interpretation skills
> than others! (Do you suppose THAT's why I don't understand my wife?)
>
> In fact, I assumed it WASN'T Eras, because the OP said "I've tried
> various sites that identify fonts by asking a series of questions
> about the letter forms but have drawn a blank."
>
> And I had taken the OP's information into identifont, and it came up
> with ITC Eras.
>
I don't recall if thats one of the sites I tried, If so, I must have
either clicked the wrong choice of icon at some point or hit "don't
know" for one of the answers where I actually did know. mea culpa.
Anyway, I feel slightly foolish but heartened by the help received -
thanks all.