Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

error -3034

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Persis Wallace

unread,
Jan 15, 1997, 3:00:00 AM1/15/97
to hsrp...@aol.com

Has anybody come across this error? I get the message:
Reserved error -3034 there is no message for this error.
It seems to be related to assigning a query to an open form as the
recordsource, but it could be something totally different! The thing
that has me stumped is that I have 5 queries that are identical except
that they use different tables with identical structures (this was done
originally by someone else and it's too late to change it.) It works on
4 of them and I get this aggravating message on the 5th!!!!
Has anybody dealt with it?
Persis Wallace

News Reader

unread,
Jan 17, 1997, 3:00:00 AM1/17/97
to

In article <32DCFD...@eosinc.com>, Persis Wallace
<wal...@eosinc.com> writes

Error -3034 is "Query Objects are being updated".

Does this help?

[BTW, the reserved error list is in the MS Knowledgebase at Q115846]

------
Mark Horton
ISC Ltd
------
Reply address: nre...@insci.demon.co.uk

David Daily

unread,
Jan 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM1/19/97
to

Realize this doesn't help much but the error code comments from the
knowledge base indicate the following

JET_errQueryChanging -3034 Query Objects are being updated


--
Dave Daily - Trying to Keep It Simple :-)
E-mail: david...@genesisnet.net

Persis Wallace <wal...@eosinc.com> wrote in article
<32DCFD...@eosinc.com>...

Fo...@cruzio.com

unread,
Jan 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM1/23/97
to

I have run into this error before, and it seemed to be caused by a
corrupt database. Try to repair the database and see what happens.

On Fri, 17 Jan 1997 08:07:59 +0000, News Reader
<NRe...@insci.demon.com.ukx> wrote:

>In article <32DCFD...@eosinc.com>, Persis Wallace
><wal...@eosinc.com> writes

>>Has anybody come across this error? I get the message:
>>Reserved error -3034 there is no message for this error.
>>It seems to be related to assigning a query to an open form as the
>>recordsource, but it could be something totally different! The thing
>>that has me stumped is that I have 5 queries that are identical except
>>that they use different tables with identical structures (this was done
>>originally by someone else and it's too late to change it.) It works on
>>4 of them and I get this aggravating message on the 5th!!!!
>>Has anybody dealt with it?
>>Persis Wallace
>

0 new messages