--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CodeMash" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codemash+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to code...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/codemash.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CodeMash" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to
codemash+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
code...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/codemash.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Given these constraints (and maybe some that I haven't thought of yet), what do you think can be done next year to improve?Serious and constructive suggestions only, please.
Full week attendees should get first dibs on rooms.
The problem is that for all the other weeks of the year the Kalahari’s system is sufficient to handle the load. It doesn’t make sense for them to spend a lot of money to fix a problem that only effects them less than 2% of the time.
--
Define “out-of-towner.” If it’s everyone who doesn’t live within 10 miles of the venue that’s got to about about 99% of the attendees.
From: code...@googlegroups.com [mailto:code...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter Ritchie
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 12:30 PM
To: code...@googlegroups.com
They also did not handle this well. I just had a horrific experience with an agent and her manager….
From: code...@googlegroups.com [mailto:code...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of James Bender
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 12:35 PM
To: code...@googlegroups.com
The problem is that for all the other weeks of the year the Kalahari’s system is sufficient to handle the load. It doesn’t make sense for them to spend a lot of money to fix a problem that only effects them less than 2% of the time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CodeMash" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codemash+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to code...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/codemash.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Yeah, but who knows how long that will be. Until it happens there is no motivation to fix the “problem.” We can’t rely on this being solved by them anytime soon.
From: code...@googlegroups.com [mailto:code...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of David Stanek
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 12:45 PM
To: code...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [CodeMash] Suggestion thread for improving the 2016 Hotel Reservation process
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:35 PM, James Bender <ja...@jamescbender.com> wrote:
--
A different venue would fix it…
From: code...@googlegroups.com [mailto:code...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of James Bender
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 12:47 PM
To: code...@googlegroups.com
Don’t hold your breath.
I like the idea of a room share system to prearrage the room sharing. I've arranged room sharing for myself and fellow/previous co-workers for every CodeMash I've attended over the years. Then we split the cost evenly based on however many stay in the room.
Larry
+1 for a room share system.
From: code...@googlegroups.com [mailto:code...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Laurence Mingle
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 12:52 PM
To: code...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [CodeMash] Suggestion thread for improving the 2016 Hotel Reservation process
I like the idea of a room share system to prearrage the room sharing. I've arranged room sharing for myself and fellow/previous co-workers for every CodeMash I've attended over the years. Then we split the cost evenly based on however many stay in the room.
So here is a suggestion for next year. Ticket purchases go into a queue in the order they are made. Then on the day hotel reservations open you send out a special room reservation code via email. These are sent out in the order that ticket purchases are made with the exception that alumni tickets are alternated with normal tickets. The emails go out a couple at a time at 5 or 10 minute intervals. You can only call to reserve your room using the reservation code. Therefore the reservation calls will be distributed over the course of the day in the order the ticket sales were made.
It's all about the algorythm.
Some people commented that order of ticket sales is not fair. So I agree random lottery would be better. But the trick is in order to help the Kalahari and make best use of the attendees time we would have to forcefully stagger the call volume. So releasing reservation tickets on a staggered basis might solve this. Of course it would require one of us coders to volunteer a bit of time to write the email tool and tie it to what eventbrite provides.
Every year, we evaluate what works and what doesn't work about how Codemash operates, and we try to improve on the process the next year without impacting what has been successful in the past. Sometimes the new attempts work great and everyone cheers... and sometimes not.Today, the hotel reservation process is an example of something that sounded good on paper, but is generating a lot of frustration in the actual implementation (and not just for the people unable to get through - it's frustrating for the organizers to see this happen, too).Let's use this thread to post your suggestions for how it can be improved for next year.The situation and things that can't change:
- We have about 850 hotel rooms on the property for 2000+ people attending the conference. There are a number of other hotels in the area, and we provide a shuttle service as a way to handle overflows. Families staying offsite can still get waterpark passes and spend their day at the Kalahari.
- We won't reduce the number of tickets - that will cause other problems during ticket sales.
- We cannot be in the business of taking reservations on the Kalahari's behalf when you buy your ticket. Did that the first year. Too many moving parts and headaches for us to be successful.
- We need to keep the alumni ticket program going, but cannot give the 900+ alumni ticket holders exclusive access to the reservation line ahead of everyone else. That's why this year's reservations opened today for everyone all at once.
- We cannot open the reservations before tickets are sold. That was last year's problem that we tried to improve this year (the hotel almost sold out before anybody even had a ticket last year once word got out about the group code being accepted).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CodeMash" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codemash+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to code...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/codemash.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reservation codes should "guarantee" a room if you call within the given time frame, say 1 hour.
I'm not sure how to handle rooms that aren't used, do you start over or do you just open it up? Opening it up could turn it into a rush again...
Not to be contentious but what's the problem with last year?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CodeMash" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codemash+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to code...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/codemash.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I wonder if not discounting the rate so much might help alleviate this problem somewhat. The Codemash room rate is ridiculously cheap compared to normal prices. Perhaps if it wasn’t such a great deal then everyone wouldn’t want to stay there so badly. Since Codemash gets such a great rate for Kalahari I’d suspect a deal could be worked out where the conference saves money elsewhere and that savings is passed on to the attendees in the form of lower prices, more swag, dark chocolate covered bacon or something along those lines.
Also, I know a lot of peeps bring their families and that is awfully nice, but given that those numbers are in the minority and the demand for rooms by conference attendees cannot be met, maybe that stuff should be cut out. Maybe between these 2 things some kind of discounts could be worked out for additional rooms and availability at a discount rate for Friday & Saturday nights and families could join in for the weekend.
Another idea would be to offer different rates for single vs. double occupancy. In order to get a double occupancy rate the person making the reservation would need to have 2 ticket codes.
--
So in summary, policy should be based on what you want, instead of what’s best for the majority? J
I would suggest we keep in mind that we don't see and don't know the many difficult
tradeoffs the organizers have undertaken to make on our behalf, and
that if we care about this event, we should try harder to show care
for the people who bring it to us. I don't know any of them, but I
guarantee you they're doing their best to show care for us.
- Amitai
Not at all. Facilitating room sharing gives people more options. It will still come down to supply and demand. As far as the families go, it’s really nice to be able to bring the fam to a conference, but from what I have seen, the percentage attendees with families there is very low. Also, from a priority standpoint, it’s only logical that rooms in the conference hotel would go to those attending the conference first.
Full week attendees should get first dibs on rooms.
On Oct 10, 2014 11:48 AM, "Jason Follas" <jfo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Every year, we evaluate what works and what doesn't work about how Codemash operates, and we try to improve on the process the next year without impacting what has been successful in the past. Sometimes the new attempts work great and everyone cheers... and sometimes not.Today, the hotel reservation process is an example of something that sounded good on paper, but is generating a lot of frustration in the actual implementation (and not just for the people unable to get through - it's frustrating for the organizers to see this happen, too).Let's use this thread to post your suggestions for how it can be improved for next year.The situation and things that can't change:
- We have about 850 hotel rooms on the property for 2000+ people attending the conference. There are a number of other hotels in the area, and we provide a shuttle service as a way to handle overflows. Families staying offsite can still get waterpark passes and spend their day at the Kalahari.
- We won't reduce the number of tickets - that will cause other problems during ticket sales.
- We cannot be in the business of taking reservations on the Kalahari's behalf when you buy your ticket. Did that the first year. Too many moving parts and headaches for us to be successful.
- We need to keep the alumni ticket program going, but cannot give the 900+ alumni ticket holders exclusive access to the reservation line ahead of everyone else. That's why this year's reservations opened today for everyone all at once.
- We cannot open the reservations before tickets are sold. That was last year's problem that we tried to improve this year (the hotel almost sold out before anybody even had a ticket last year once word got out about the group code being accepted).
Given these constraints (and maybe some that I haven't thought of yet), what do you think can be done next year to improve?Serious and constructive suggestions only, please.
My wife and kids get ecstatic about CodeMash, too, but they probably wouldn’t attend if we couldn’t get a room at Kalahari, because the difference between running back to the room and getting four kids dressed and packed up to drive back to the room, is significant.
Selfishly, I would say families get first dibs on the rooms!
On the other hand, I have attended alone, in the past, and would have loved to participate in a room sharing arrangement, if it had been easy to coordinate.
The more options, that are optional, the better, I think. I didn’t think anyone was proposing mandatory room sharing, but I think it’s a great option to have available.
Yeah, someone else already posted that where were 300 kids for Kidzmash which is at least triple of what I thought the numbers for kids were. They must all be some pretty well behaved kids, because I really don’t notice them around much.
I hear you on the Friday thing. I already suggested that things could possibly be structured to aim the conference more towards families coming in for the weekend.
The bottom line is that for both the conference and the hotel supply exceeds demand. There’s no way to make everyone happy. These are great problems for the organizers to have.
From: code...@googlegroups.com [mailto:code...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of yllams
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 3:43 PM
To: code...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [CodeMash] Suggestion thread for improving the 2016 Hotel Reservation process
If the percentage was so low, as you say, the KidzMash wouldn't exist and continue to grow as well...not to mention if you stay over to Sat. you will still see a lot of people from the conference whose families show up Friday and spend the weekend.
On Friday, October 10, 2014 3:33:06 PM UTC-4, MikeFeltman wrote:
Think: "brainstorming", where ideas don't become "strawmen" for debate until later.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CodeMash" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codemash+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to code...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/codemash.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
The answer is simple:If the goal is to make as many people happy as possible, the people sharing rooms to the max need to go first and then down the line.People going solo will get the short end of the stick but that's what happens when you maximize the number of people staying at the Kalahari.Execution is a different issue.
--
Last year the people that were complaining were people that hadn't been there before and didn't plan ahead...this year just about everyone is complaining. Like tickets being alumni gives you an advantage, last year it gave you the advantage to know to get your hotel early and you get your tix early. Why should that change being alumni should give you the advantage on hotel room buy as well.
The room share is great for people not planning on bringing family but again Kalahari's draw is that I want to bring my family and don't want to share a room. Beyond that while I might be willing to share a room with someone I know, I'm an adult and have zero interest in sharing with someone I don't know and shouldn't be punished from getting a room because of that.
On Friday, October 10, 2014 2:07:59 PM UTC-4, Jason Follas wrote:
Just to add to the things that cannot change while brainstorming:- We won't change the venue. The Kalahari itself as a backdrop is as much a part of Codemash as the speakers, sponsors, staff, and audience. You could put on an identical conference somewhere else, but it would not be Codemash.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Amitai Schlair <sch...@schmonz.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Ellie Chalko
<ellie_...@cynergies.net> wrote:
> A different venue would fix it...
A different venue would likely claim to fix it. Perhaps they would
succeed, perhaps not. Do we know how that's different from what likely
occurred with the Kalahari today? If the organizers were to choose a
different venue, what tradeoffs would that entail? I could offer some
guesses. The surest one would probably be the cost of attendance.
Of course, if CodeMash became expensive, that would be one way to ease
the registration bottlenecks.
I hear your frustration. It took me more than two hours to not be able
to stay at the Kalahari; not a great user experience. I would suggest
we keep in mind that we don't see and don't know the many difficult
tradeoffs the organizers have undertaken to make on our behalf, and
that if we care about this event, we should try harder to show care
for the people who bring it to us. I don't know any of them, but I
guarantee you they're doing their best to show care for us.
- Amitai
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CodeMash" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codemash+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to code...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/codemash.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
This not an easy problem to solve. Honestly, the "real" answer to this is for the Kalahari to have more rooms, period.If this wasn't an indoor water park with all of the after hours activities, this wouldn't be an issue, there would be people that would seek out satellite hotels just to save some money. The problem is that everyone wants to stay in the Resort, and that just isn't possible.Room sharing is a fine idea, except that because of the venue (and the appeal of codemash in general) many people bring their families with them. There may be 2000 people there for the conference, but how many are actually at the Kalahari for that week, I'm guessing closer to 4-5 thousand.I understand people who are frustrated that some booked hotel rooms before even buying a ticket in the past couple of years, but IMO, this was not a better experience than last year.Without being able to add more rooms to the Kalahari, the simple laws of supply and demand may need to be applied here. Ticket with Kalahari reservation code will cost X+Y, ticket without Kalahari code will only cost X. Problem is, Y is going to need to be fairly significant.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CodeMash" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codemash+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to code...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/codemash.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
+1 billion
I'm in favor of free market but if you don't do free market, what about a weighted lottery. Room shares and full week attendees get weighted higher (more chances to win). Maybe also consider non lotto winners from previous years as another chance in the pool. Eventually your chances are pretty high you will get a room. This would require quite a tool to make this possible. Fun in my opinion... Perhaps a open source project we could all get involved with?
It's not the end of the world to stay at another hotel... I've done it several times.
The only demographics that I think would be significantly impacted by having to stay off site, are the families with young children or those with physical challenges.
My opinion is that we should focus on improving the efficiency of the reservation process already in place (e.g., put it online), and maybe making sure the shuttle service is up to par (I always drove myself, so I don't know if it needs any attention).
My 2 cents...