Just for the heads up, I highly doubt anyone will need anymore explanation after they've thought and thought and thought about it until it sinks in so I will refrain from doing so regardless as to the questions given the benefit of any challenge pertaining to understanding what I've said here. That is all I have to say on the matter, unfortunately time is sparse. In as much as someone has thought through what I've said and wishes to discuss it further, others feel free to do so amongst yourselves.
All the best and Godspeed!
On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 6:39:04 PM UTC+10, Hi wrote:Yes I briefly mentioned it ages ago. Here is a further addition to it.
I have to be bluntly honest yal are way, way behind the 8 ball especially these image streaming folk, and those n-back folk, well.. I won't even go there. Let's just say a few cognitive biases are at work keeping people from actualising themselves beyond the illusions of the placebo effect here. This is just to push you along, remember that the map is not the territory, if you want to have real success you have to detach yourself from the known world, open your mind and try something new like the technique I'm proposing in this comment. Good luck and I have relative respect for anyone making sincere efforts to improving their cognition, its obviously not the easiest thing to do and nor should it be!
I call it math streaming, the difference between this and image streaming is that:(1) You're streaming patterns not mindlessly describing details like a moron with no imagination (which is what you do in image streaming - I'm not calling people morons, I'm saying its a moronic activity. Very big difference :-) ) .(2) You symbolically represent the patterns you've discerned as interactions between symbolically represented variables in a math equation which may also have patterns as subsets to them.(3) You make sure you symbolically represent as many quality patterns between and within objects.(4) Ensure that there is logical connections between all of the variables.(5) Ensure the symbolic representations are different every time. The symbols can be anything you want, I just recommend that they stay novel, this will keep the task less automatic and more challenging while simultaneously facilitating imagination along with the other efforts.This task is not for the faint-hearted, so if anyone has questions in relation to it please address my ideas here with thoughtfulness. Simple questions and or statements will not be responded to, only those responses that are at least a decent paragraph long expressing strong interest in the activity. This is because I only want to invest my time in describing the technique further to those extremely interested and sincere in properly improving their cognition. This technique is simultaneously the most pure I've ever created and come across. It taxes working memory hugely, especially your focus, and more so than any other task I've attempted. It goes without saying that it's highly g loaded with respect to it pertaining to the perception and organisation of patterns.
You piss me off, you are very arrogant like me and you have stumbled upon something that you havefaith in to the point were artistically promote and endorse with providing any proof. Yes, you are very similar to me.
You will get no credit for this. No one will. If it works then it belongs to everyone.
"all the different relationships and patterns that could be integrated in order to create more comprehensive formulas that determine the relationships between a group of interconnected variables" that's to me a mental model of something. Not to bother you but forming mental models about things is normal, and that's what most of us do everyday. I think it helps developing deep understand around things, but how would it help spark creativity/new insights? I mean how would it help increase fluid intelligence? I don't believe in the WM-bottleneck theory. :P
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dual N-Back, Brain Training & Intelligence" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to brain-trainin...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to brain-t...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/brain-training.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/brain-training/10c2df9d-0339-456a-8be2-29536ade673d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
So I've had a few people message me now about the streaming process, I promise to get back to you.Otherwise that's how you know someone deserves it, when they go to the effort of stating their intentions, thoughts and queries in relation to the activity, of which all people who have messaged me have done. It allows me to get a relatively good sense of the person before I decide to help or not (of which I will for all people that have messaged).
I have ZERO desire helping people that do not deserve it, there's many people in the world that you simply wouldn't want to have them knowing how to improve their intelligence. This is of course the wisdom of not revealing everything to the public about various subjects, improving intelligence to me is one of them.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dual N-Back, Brain Training & Intelligence" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to brain-trainin...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to brain-t...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/brain-training.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/brain-training/CADszJxXOx3hf9GuuZDp9LeGKZc63JLC-GcPauKGCxLaJ5TPzuw%40mail.gmail.com.
I've disabled notification long time ago, therefore I don't receive any email and I check the forum every now and then. By the way I've took a screenshot in which you've said the technique would have remained for at least a week, but you deleted nonetheless."I should have simply said "send me an email to discuss", of which people have done anyway and of which I've shared many more of my own insights privately" don't you think that broadcasting the message once for all is a smarter way to convey your idea? Apart from the useless comments, the forum is not only a broadcasting option but it acts, in a way, as a versioning tool of arguments."Only Moon Kyu Seong shall receive the benefit now [...] Ungrateful snots should really reconsider the terms upon which they live their life." was this necessary? Why should you even care about not informing the "Ungrateful snots" in the first place? I must admit your argument is outside the scope of my intelligence.
I'm don't want to debate over this and pollute this topic any further. You are unfair and biased toward the community.
Hey c’mon guys, you’re both being childish. There’s a point where you gotta stop arguing. If the other party does not understand, then so be it. Don’t waste your time (and my inbox storage!) on this crap.
Fuck off you cocky bastard, stop trying to get other people to prove technique because you're too lazy and undisciplined to do it yourself. If I had a technique like that, and wasnt bogged down by existential problems. I do it myself and shut the naysayers up myself.
If you're so damn smart you should be able to see the long term results of you proving your technique and changing lives.