If you are busy with all these existing options, is it really a good
idea to consider sinking hundreds of dollars into more brain games? (I
haven't really followed Lumosity or Posit's games, so I will
generously assume that they don't have $0 equivalents and actually do
worthwhile things.)
Consider the important economic concept of marginal utility**; you
pursue the highest-benefit option until it stops being profitable,
then you move on to the next one. You invest in one college degree
over 4 years, you don't go for 10 simultaneously over 40 years. A
charity/philanthropy* example may help; from
http://www.slate.com/id/2034/
> 'People constantly ignore my good advice by contributing to the American Heart Association, the American Cancer Society, CARE, and public radio all in the same year--as if they were thinking, "OK, I think I've pretty much wrapped up the problem of heart disease; now let's see what I can do about cancer."'
Meditation takes a fair deal of time, as does aerobic exercise, and
n-backing, and dealing with one's diet. Are you really helping
yourself by considering fragmenting your time even further? Overhead
and transition costs can be killer.
> Modafinil doesnt seem to
> improve memory, but may assist with vigilance/drive--you may study
> longer/harder (if anybody has experience with a specific brand from a
> specific source, let me know--seems to be lots of disparity in
> quality).
I have a page with some supplier information which may or may not be
of use to you: http://www.gwern.net/Modafinil.html#suppliers-prices
(On a side-note, I got a Zeo sleep-tracking device for Christmas.
Should be interesting to see what effects modafinil or polyphasic
napping have, if I ever try them again, along the lines of
http://blog.myzeo.com/sleeping-round-the-clock-a-polyphasic-experiment/
)
* Some interesting further reading on effective charity:
http://lesswrong.com/lw/3gj/efficient_charity_do_unto_others/
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_utility
--
gwern
http://www.gwern.net
> You are the second person that has referenced pharmacy
> express.........but i dont see that they clearly will deliver Modapro
> rather than generic, as both pages load the same selections.
Modapro is a generic, the name listed on both pages; there are only 3
generic brands, and they don't ever mention Alertec.
> And the site you ordered your modalert from......it seems they charge
> in pounds, so six pounds (maybe it was 8) for 10pills of the inferior
> modalert seems rather expensive per mg, yet they seem to be at the top
> of your chart, strangely.
IIRC, I calculated that one assuming a bulk order of 10 packages,
which drops one down to the first bulk discount and amortizes the
shipping as well.
> I also found it quite strange that olmifon/adrafinil had NO effect,
> yet modafinil did, on you. That seems most strange.
Indeed. I have a couple of theories as to why that may be the case but
nothing solid.
--
gwern
http://www.gwern.net
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dual N-Back, Brain Training & Intelligence" group.
To post to this group, send email to brain-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to brain-trainin...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/brain-training?hl=en.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to brain-trainin...@googlegroups.com.
I don't list it because
a) the page is intended for the use of adults, not children (who
shouldn't be able to spend that much or spend at all on these sites)
b) the legal risks, risk of contaminants or counterfeit ingredients,
and other risks vastly outweigh the risk of SJS even if one takes it
at face value
c) I don't take it at face value; from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb4345/is_9_34/ai_n29293254/ :
> "One case was considered most likely to be SJS, for a risk of about 1 in 1,000. Although there were no reports of SJS among 36,000 children prescribed the drug off-label between 2002 and 2005, there was concern that some cases could occur with wider use of the drug, and the panel recommended that the company conduct a 3,000 patient study to further clarify the risk."
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Aman Idle <aman...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> btw i looked at united pharmacy .co .uk site and they sell generic. But it
> looked too cheap, £4.50 for to pills of 100 mg modalert. What does generic
> mean anyway, is it just weaker form of the real deal? Because that would
> explain why it is so cheap.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_drug
--
gwern
http://www.gwern.net
I hadn't expected to discuss this in detail yet (haven't looked into
how you get the nice charts you see in places like
http://blog.myzeo.com/sleeping-round-the-clock-a-polyphasic-experiment/
), but my notes currently live at http://www.gwern.net/zeo.html
> Basically it's about spotting 'sleep
> stealers', the causes that affect your 'ZQ score', right?
Well, it could be. That isn't my primary interest though, since I have
two major sleep stealers (caffeine and light) and those are easily
dealt with.
I'm more interested in more exotic things - for example, I'd like to
quantify, if only unscientificly and for myself, the benefits I claim
for melatonin in http://www.gwern.net/Melatonin.html
Polyphasic sleep continues to interest me as well. The Zeo offers
solid measurements of sleep quality and changes, and DNB itself will
be very useful for measuring mental performance when I try again.
> Do you consider the data you gathered eye-opening (you're more conscious of
> what to act upon in order to get good sleep at night) eg you
> were surprised how much such or such cause heavily affected your sleep
> quality? or do you consider it unhelpful and obvious anyways?
My principal surprise is how quickly I fall asleep and how much time I
spend in light sleep and how deep sleep is weighted toward the
beginning of the night.
> also if you have time, I have a few more questions:
> - the only data you get is time spent in the different sleep phases/time
> awake (your ZQ is deduced from that data alone)?
The Zeo docs explain somewhere exactly what the ZQ is. I think it's
probably just something like (deep+REM) - awakenings.
> - what are the questions on the form? the regular sleep stealers (alcohol,
> coffee, light/noise, etc.)? is it possible to add to the form other causes
> you want to track (eg modafinil use/naps) and put them on the form/easily
> get data and graphs for them too?
I believe you can enter arbitrary fields. I haven't made much use of
it so far since I'm just alternating melatonin and no-melatonin
nights, which doesn't require careful tracking.
> - could you personally spot specific causes that hinder your sleep?
Well, I have spotted a few instances of cats bothering me in the early
morning around 4-5 AM. :)
> - did it help you improve your sleep quality already?
Not especially.
--
gwern
http://www.gwern.net
Thanks. I try hard. Feedback is always welcome - no one ever uses the comments.
> what's mostly
> interesting is assessing your sleep more precisely. then you intuitively
> fine tune your habits to eventually get better quality sleep, because most
> causes are obvious and you know what to do.
That's the obvious thing to do. Ever read Seth Roberts's
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seth_Roberts#Self-Experimentation) blog
on self-experiments
(http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/category/self-experimentation/)?
Interesting stuff. (Although one should remember strongly all the
usual skeptical warnings and considerations for any of this.)
> awesome I'm probably going to buy one.
Shoot, I knew I should've provided some affiliate links! My one chance
for profit, forever gone!
> http://www.geek.com/articles/gadgets/hey-insomniacs-zeo-opens-up-its-wireless-sleep-device-to-developers-2010063/ I
> stumbled upon this, and I'm wondering what good app could be built over the
> zeo.
> (they say assessing brain waves during meditation is possible, but you said
> it doesn't work well?)
I said the default software for measuring sleep doesn't do anything
for meditation. It's a suggested project, but searching the forums and
Zeo blog and generally googling, I don't see anyone who has actually
done it.
Oh, and as far as custom sleepstealers go, they were added in the past
few months apparently:
http://blog.myzeo.com/forum/room-to-improve/custom-causeeffect-factors/
> I just wached Arianna Huffington: How to succeed? Get more sleep on TED
> talks and it's not that good,
Agreed; complete fluff. Not that one should expect anything other from
Huffington.
> but I'd be curious to get data about how much
> sleep affects dnb/working memory performance, IQ test performance, and
> learning performance. you can clearly see sleep's influence on learning,
> when you're learning a new piano piece: you can feel the memory improvements
> after one or more nights of sleep.
That's at least 2 possible interactions of DNB with sleep. One could
do n-backing just before sleep, and see whether percentages shift
(more deep sleep as the brain grows/changes?) or whether one sleeps
better (fewer awakenings, less light sleep). And one could do
n-backing after waking up, to look for correlation between good/bad
sleeps and performance (one would expect good sleep ~> good scores).
Actually, those are both worth investigating, so I think I'll add them
to the list.
> it would be fun to put a rough number on
> how many IQ points/new skills and memories/working memory you lose per hour
> of REM/light/deep sleep lost. also I would like to see when you get your
> full wm/IQ back (after 1/2/3... good night(s)?).
Could just sleep deprive yourself and see. Also, that sort of question
is right up the military and NASA's alley, so I suspect the academic
literature has all you could want to know about relationships.
> I guess the Zeo could
> generate a nice pool of data for sleep researchers.
One of the more controversial aspects of Zeo Inc. is that one of their
revenue sources is/may-be selling aggregated sleep data, so presumably
they agree: http://blog.myzeo.com/personal-data-privacy-and-zeo/
> What I want is feel I'm at max energy every morning at 8:00. for this I
> think I mostly need to enforce a regular bedtime at 12:00 (to get a regular
> circadian rhythm), so I fall asleep right away and get very good quality
> sleep in a short time (7h). I was almost never able to achieve this (feel
> good in the morning), so I'm really curious to know how it feels to be like
> this everyday. to get this what I need is enforce bedtime, with a powerdown
> hour, melatonin and all the other tricks-- that's the hardest: enforce a
> regular bedtime hour.
Enforcing bedtime with melatonin may turn out to be its most valuable use.
--
gwern
http://www.gwern.net
Vassilis
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Gwern Branwen <gwe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Nick <nicolas....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok so I get it, reading your site (interesting site btw!)
>
> Thanks. I try hard. Feedback is always welcome - no one ever uses the comments.
>
>> what's mostly
>> interesting is assessing your sleep more precisely. then you intuitively
>> fine tune your habits to eventually get better quality sleep, because most
>> causes are obvious and you know what to do.
>
> That's the obvious thing to do. Ever read Seth Roberts's
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seth_Roberts#Self-Experimentation) blogG
Already on the list.
> and if to your knowledge
> there is an app that functions similarly to the NovaDreamer
> (http://www.lucidity.com/novadreamer.html) which detects
It's been frequently suggested. So far I don't see any discussion of
it: http://blog.myzeo.com/forum/lucid-dreaming-discussion/ So I think
no one has done it. Software is easy; hardware is hard.
--
gwern
http://www.gwern.net
The benefits of task-switching have been discussed previously in this
group (e.g. see
http://groups.google.com/group/brain-training/browse_thread/thread/19f4cd0af7d3c9e1/f6dc747727385eed?lnk=gst&q=%22task+switching%22#f6dc747727385eed).
There also some relevant papers indicating that task switching may transfer:
http://mc.psychonomic-journals.org/content/36/8/1470.full.pdf+html
http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=996156526&dok_var=d1&dok_ext=pdf&filename=996156526.pdf