Re: FW: Has anyone experienced this - more info

[Garry Hasler]

Hi August,

Depending upon what caused the 4083 to occur, you may have gotten a 4083 traceback report listing in the
program output. This will show you what modules were involved in the lead up to the failure and any available
program interrupt information.

I noticed a reference to SORT so have any sort-options been changed? Has the partition allocation where the application
is being executed changed or is it being run in a different partition? Is the program using the "SORT-RETURN" special
register to check if the sort completed ok?

If you are comfortable reading a system dump then you can try TRAP(ON,MIN). This will produce a dump for the original
program interrupt that caused LE to try and report on the failure which couldn't be completed so a 4083/03 abend was
issued.
Eg // EXEC LETGEN30,SIZE=(LETGEN30,128K),PARM='/TRAP(ON,MIN)'

Regards,
Garry Hasler

On 22/10/16 05:57, August Carideo/RYE/US wrote:

Thanks Andy

 

// EXEC LETGEN30,SIZE=(LETGEN30,128K)                                   

 

 

From: VSE-L [mailto:vse-l-bounces+august.carideo=avon...@lists.lehigh.edu] On Behalf Of August Carideo/RYE/US
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 5:15 PM
To: VSE Discussion List <vs...@lists.lehigh.edu>
Subject: FW: Has anyone experienced this - more info

 

Just got better

He claims the so-called daily job that uses the same phase works after the restore, but his weekly job with same phase does not

I am not on site and of course no remote access

 

 

From: VSE-L [mailto:vse-l-bounces+august.carideo=avon...@lists.lehigh.edu] On Behalf Of Andy Engels
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 4:58 PM
To: VSE Discussion List <vs...@lists.lehigh.edu>
Subject: RE: Has anyone experienced this - more info

 

Did someone link another program with a similar name where the first 4 bytes of program name are identical?   (LETG)

 

Change auto to the program name and see if it’s better.    I’ve grown to hate AUTO…

 

____________________________________

Andy Engels
IS Team Leader – Technology Infrastructure
IMRF
Oak Brook, IL
630-368-5346

 

From: VSE-L [mailto:vse-l-bounces+aengels=imrf...@lists.lehigh.edu] On Behalf Of August Carideo/RYE/US
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 3:44 PM
To: VSE Discussion List
Subject: FW: Has anyone experienced this - more info

 

They recompiled obv w/ wrong code

Had then restore from backup

Still does not work

 

RESTLIB2

LETGEN30 PHASE    99-02-03 11-10-20 173136 B     176  NO  NO  31 ANY

 

 

 

From: August Carideo/RYE/US
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 4:39 PM
To: 'VSE Discussion List' <vs...@lists.lehigh.edu>
Subject: Has anyone experienced this

 

 

 

CEE3322C ABENDU4083 RSN=003 IN A COBOL PROGRAM

 

VSE 5.1.1

Saying that nothing changed (will see)

Jobs runs on a daily basis, all of a sudden stopped working today

Is that an odd exec size ?

 

Phase:

LETGEN30 PHASE    99-02-03 16-10-21  37568 B      39  NO  NO  24  24

 

 

// EXEC LETGEN30,SIZE=(AUTO,128K)                                              

1S54I  PHASE LETGEN30 IS TO BE FETCHED FROM PRDSRCE.LIB                        

100-SORT1      

 

Thanks,

Augie

                                                               

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
VSE-L mailing list
VS...@lists.lehigh.edu
https://lists.lehigh.edu/mailman/listinfo/vse-l

-- 
Tip me here: http://madaz13bbp-3696.tip.me
linkedin : http://au.linkedin.com/pub/garry-hasler/68/a9b/557
LE z/VSE Blog : https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/lezvse/?lang=en