For me, the system cloning is not a happy journey, obviously, I got some trouble:
First I use ADRDSSU to copy source RES volume OS1RES to target TSTRES, at dataset level, recat the datasets to target master catalog. I got some problem with some datasets, the message code is ADR439E, reason code is 60, then I decided to delete all datasets which had been copied successfully, but failed to delete some datasets, messages said:
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 102 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLFM-7
I checked DFSMSdfp Diagnosis Reference, it pointed out "The format-1 DSCB was not deleted because the data set was open".
ISPF 3.4, gave the volume serial, tried to delete one of the datasets, said "data set in use", PF1 twice gave me this information:
Data Set Contention
Command ===>
More: +
Data set 'DEXTER.LOADLIB'
is in use by the following 2 user(s) and/or job(s):
--------------------------------------------------------
DEX ADMST1
yes, this library was allocated in the ISPLLIB concatenation, but that's on source RES volume OS1RES, I just copied it from OS1RES to target volume TSTRES, how could the system open tow library at the same time? I appreciate your help.
Dex
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to list...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Itschak
Thanks
Dex
>So you have 2 choices: to logon without the ispplib concatenation or install
>a program (I think the CBTTAPE.ORG has one) that ignore the Enque for
>selected datasets.
>
>Itschak
>
the system doesn't open 2 libraries at the same time
it's just that the ENQueue is done on dataset name , the volser is not
taken in account
DFSMS release 10 allows this kind of operation for system cloning
see topic "Rename function for duplicate data set names" in DFSMS migration
STGADMIN.DPDSRN.olddsname
Controls the ability to rename a non-SMS-managed data set whose
name is in use in another address space.
I finally find a program in CBT file 183, BYPASSNQ, said "They sometimes face a situation where they
have to delete or rename a data set not currently allocated to anyone but which they can't delete
because it has the same name as another data set which (1) exists on a different disk volume and
(2) is currently allocated to a long-running task." , BYPASSNQ works great.
Thank you all
Dex
It's because the system enqueues with the dataset name and does not include the VOLSER. This makes life simpler and also tries to enforce the
cataloging of datasets under the proper search criteria.
>> how could the system open tow library at the same time?
>
> the system doesn't open 2 libraries at the same time
>
> it's just that the ENQueue is done on dataset name , the volser is not
> taken in account
>
> DFSMS release 10 allows this kind of operation for system cloning
>
> see topic "Rename function for duplicate data set names" in DFSMS migration
>
> STGADMIN.DPDSRN.olddsname
> Controls the ability to rename a non-SMS-managed data set whose
> name is in use in another address space.
>
------SNIP_______
Which is curious... Does anyone let SMS manage their SYSRES pack?
If so... it would seem on the surface that this is somewhat useless, NO?
Ed
Barry Schwarz
OS/390 Systems Programmer
Phone: 253-773-4221
Fax: 253-773-1257
Mail stop: 80-JE
e-mail: barry.a...@boeing.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Gould [mailto:edg...@AMERITECH.NET]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:38 AM
To: IBM-...@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Data Set can't be deleted
Francois LE MANER5/6/02 3:54 AM
>> how could the system open tow library at the same time?
>
> the system doesn't open 2 libraries at the same time
>
> it's just that the ENQueue is done on dataset name , the volser is not
> taken in account
>
> DFSMS release 10 allows this kind of operation for system cloning
>
> see topic "Rename function for duplicate data set names" in DFSMS
migration
>
> STGADMIN.DPDSRN.olddsname
> Controls the ability to rename a non-SMS-managed data set whose
> name is in use in another address space.
>
------SNIP_______
Which is curious... Does anyone let SMS manage their SYSRES pack?
If so... it would seem on the surface that this is somewhat useless, NO?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
posted via MFF : http://www.mainframeforum.com/f1363/s
registration is required to reply to posts