On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 at 10:34:46 AM UTC-8, Al Eisner wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, evergene wrote:
>
> > Mike D. wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 2:04:20 PM UTC-8, Julian Macassey wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:32:54 -0800, Al Eisner <
eis...@slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Coppola apologist! If he really wants to accomplish something he should
> >>>> make another movie as good as those he made in the 1970's (and late 60's).
> >>>
> >>> He made good movies? Did I miss one?
> >>>
> >>> I put him in the Hollywood wanker crowd along with Alfred
> >>> Hitchcock, Michael Bay and Stephen Spielberg.
> >>>
> >>> Two of those men have a reputation of being gropers.
> >>
> >> Alfred Hitchcock started out as a Limey bastard, making the typically
> >> unwatchable films of the 1930s before moving to Hollywood and
> >> making films with character and dialogue as well as narrative drive.
> >
> > "The Lodger," (1927) with Ivor Novello, is a good movie. True, it
> > doesn't have much dialogue, but it's a silent movie. It's the only one
> > of Hitchcock's silents I've seen.
> >
> > Hitchcock's inventiveness is unsurpassed. "Rear Window" is brilliant,
> > "Rope" with its 10-minute-long takes, is fascinating, as is
> > "Lifeboat," shot with only one set, a lifeboat. And then there's
> > "Vertigo." And a dozen other great films.
>
> And some of the greatest, contra Mike D., were from the thirties.
> All eminently watchable. My favorite, however, is Vertigo.
to watch. The Third Man doesn't count because it was written by Welles.
toast. The Ealing comedies are like making a meal of olives.
is on. For non-fluff fanciers, there is Lawrence of Arabia.