Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

— IT WAS “THIS IS YOUR LIFE” FOCUSSED ON INFATUATION WITH *DICKS*

1 view
Skip to first unread message

dolf

unread,
Mar 26, 2018, 7:25:40 PM3/26/18
to
60 MINUTES ON STORMY DANIELS WITH ANDERSON COOPERS?

Wrong show mate?

IT WAS “THIS IS YOUR LIFE” FOCUSSED ON INFATUATION WITH *DICKS*

<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FEXr2Wh4fPQ>

This Is Your Life was an Australian television documentary and reality show
of 60 minutes duration, based on the American show of the same name, in
which the host surprises guests with a show documenting their lives, with
audience participation from their friends and family.

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Is_Your_Life_(Australian_TV_series)>

SUBJECT WAS: Stormy Lays an Egg on 60 Minutes

Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> RUSH: So I watched it last night, and Kathryn could not believe — you know,
> I’m sending her text messages, she’s watching in another room, it’s one of the
> dogs’ birthdays, and so she’s in there with one of the dogs and I started
> sending her notes about the interview on 60 Minutes.
>
> She said, “You’re watching this? I can’t believe you would waste your time
> watching this. I want to know what you think about it.” So we were talking
> about it. And I gotta tell you something, folks. When it was all over, I
> didn’t feel horny, or anything of the sort. If this is the star of the Make
> America Horny Again Tour, this thing was a big, big bomb-out.
>
> And you know what else? Can you imagine how in Africa last night they had to
> be sweating it out? I mean, they had to be sweating bullets ’cause the last
> time an American president was alleged to have had an affair he started
> bombing aspirin factories over there. For you young-uns, that would be William
> Jefferson Blythe Clinton. That was during the Lewinsky escapade, and not only
> did he bomb an aspirin — it was actually a Tylenol factory in Africa. He also
> sent a missile into an office building in Baghdad on a Saturday night when the
> only guy there that got blown to bits was a custodian, a janitor.
>
> So greetings. Great to have you. Rush Limbaugh and the EIB Network. 800-282-
> 2882 if you want to be on the program. The email address, ElRu...@eibnet.us.
>
> They built this thing up and they built this thing up. And they continued to
> build this thing up. And they raised expectations. And I’m sorry; this thing
> last night, I don’t know if you watched it or not. We don’t have any sound
> bites on it, I don’t think, and I’m not asking for any. But it was a dud. Do
> you know what this ended up being? Snerdley didn’t watch it. Do you know what
> it ended up being? It ended up being an attempt to get Trump on campaign
> finance violations over this $130,000.
>
> That ended up being the main thrust. The babe says they had sex one time. She
> signed three different affidavits claiming they never had sex, so she has
> admitted lying one way or the other on this. Three different affidavits. She
> starts out saying, “Hey, I’m not #MeToo. I’m not a victim here. I don’t want
> anybody associating me with that.” And at the end of the interview she starts
> talking about how she was bullied and so forth.
>
> This thing, the left, I don’t know what they thought they had in this. But it
> was a dud, given the expectations. You know, this lawyer that she’s got has
> been running around talking about secret this and secret that, something on a
> disk, maybe pictures or something in a safe. And so the thing airs last night,
> and then after it’s over the lawyer says, “This is only phase one.”
>
> https://youtu.be/BtLJQVt7yHc
>
> Hey, bud, phase two nobody’s gonna see. You gotta launch everything you got.
> Even Stormy Daniels knows this. You gotta give it everything you got the first
> go round ’cause nobody’s gonna care about the second one if the first one is a
> bomb. And it really ended up where the guests that Anderson Cooper brought in,
> that 60 Minutes brought in to buttress her story, was over the $130,000 and
> now it could qualify as a campaign finance violation.
>
> And then they brought somebody on to say, “Yeah, this could easily end up over
> in Robert Mueller’s investigation.” And at that point it became crystal clear
> what this was, and it’s not at all what it was promoted to be. We were
> expecting all kinds of salaciousness and dirt and all of this. And, I mean, it
> had that, don’t misunderstand. I’m just talking about versus the expectations.
>
> BREAK TRANSCRIPT
>
> RUSH: Folks, I was not kidding. The primary (Ha!) thrust (sorry) of this
> interview last night with the porn queen, Stormy Daniels, was… The real threat
> to Trump here is that it may have been a campaign finance violation for
> Trump’s lawyer to give her 130 grand to shut up all orifices. All of them. A
> hundred… (interruption) Of course, they have no shame! No. They don’t care
> what… It was the highest rated program since Obama was 2008. That’s all they
> care about.
>
> It was the highest rated 60 Minutes since Obama’s preelection interview in
> 2008 with Michelle (My Belle). Anyway, here’s my point about this. Here you
> have this porn star, who says they had sex once but then she signed three
> different affidavits where they had never had sex. The real energy in this
> show about where Trump is really vulnerable, is campaign finance law
> violation. Okay, fine. You know, every ad… Campaign finance law requires a
> disclaimer on political TV and radio ad.
>
> You know, “I’m Joe Schmo, politics unusual, and I approved this message.” That
> kind of thing.
>
> BREAK TRANSCRIPT
>
> RUSH: Now, I want to finish one other thing here about the Stormy Daniels
> business, because it’s a teachable moment. The Democrats and the media rev
> this all up as though some kind of dirty, salacious sexual encounter is going
> to be detailed, and then when they’ve got everybody’s attention, they throw it
> off into another area like campaign finance violation.
>
> I want you to listen to this. This is Anderson Cooper from the interview with
> Stormy Daniels last night, and this is the point in the interview where they
> toss this off as maybe being of real interest to the independent counsel
> looking into collusion between Trump and Russia, which, by the way, Trump has
> expelled 60 Russian spies and closed the Russian consulate in Seattle.
>
> He announced that this morning. The reason is because of the Russians’
> involvement using poison to kill somebody on British soil. Trump’s standing
> firm with our great ally, the United Kingdom, and he’s expelling 60 Russian
> spies and closing the consulate in Seattle.
>
> Now, the left of course, “This is just for show. He doesn’t mean it. This is
> trying to throw everybody off the scent. They’re trying to throw everybody off
> track. Trump is doing this, and Putin knows. Putin is not upset about this.
> This is a deal.”
>
> There’s no way that this is going to be seen as meaning what it means. The
> left, the media are going to spin it to fit their narrative that doesn’t exist
> and for which there’s no evidence. That Trump stole the election with help
> from the Russians. But here’s Anderson Cooper now suggesting how their
> beautiful, wonderful interview with a porn queen would end up in the lap, so
> to speak, of Robert Mueller.
>
> COOPER: There is another scenario that could present a problem for the
> president. Special counsel Robert Mueller’s inquiry into Russian interference
> in the 2016 election.
>
> RUSH: Really?
>
> COOPER: In March the Washington Post reported that the special counsel has
> examined episodes involving Michael Cohen, including his efforts to launch a
> Trump branded project in Moscow in the fall of 2015, when Mr. Trump was
> seeking the Republican nomination. Is there any way that special counsel
> Robert Mueller could investigate the Stormy Daniels payment?
>
> POTTER: Yeah. That’s the wild card here. Mr. Cohen is in the middle of a place
> that’s of great interest to the special counsel.
>
> RUSH: All right. I watched this, I saw this, and I just started laughing. Are
> you guys serious? So now even this is gonna end up in the lap of Robert
> Mueller and his 15 or 16 Democrat lawyer investigators. And this guy Potter,
> what’s his name, Trevor Potter, he is the former commissioner and chairman of
> the Federal Election Commission. “Yeah, that’s the wild card here, Mr. Cohen’s
> in the middle of a place that’s of great interest to the special counsel.” So
> grasping at straws.
>
> Now, I had a piece here also by a female reporter at Entertainment Weekly. You
> know, I’m fascinated by various people’s interpretations of things. So here
> you have a female, obviously left-wing journalist, and she’s watching this
> thing last night. And you know what her main take-away was? Get this.
>
> “Of everything that came out of this 60 Minutes segment,” Daniels says that
> she “was threatened in a parking garage by someone telling her to ‘leave Trump
> alone,'” and that “by allowing his lawyer to pay Daniels $130,000 in hush
> money,” Trump may have violated campaign finance laws. But “the most upsetting
> thing of all, for me at least, were those three words: You deserve this.
> Hearing that a 27-year-old woman –” that’s how old Stormy was at the time she
> had the dalliance supposedly with Trump. “Hearing that a 27-year-old woman,
> even one who makes porn films, would assume that a powerful 60-year-old man
> was entitled to sex with her because she flirted and exercised poor judgment?
> That’s almost as depressing as the fact that the aforementioned man is now the
> leader of the free world.”
>
> So this female writer at Entertainment Weekly was distressed that Stormy
> Daniels, at age 27, thought she deserved whatever happened to her just because
> she bit on the interest of a 60-year-old guy. So her point is, man, what low
> self-esteem. This is so bad. She thought she deserved what happened to her
> because she was convinced that she had done something wrong and it was very
> depressing.
>
> So of all the things — how many of you had that take on it? I don’t know how
> many. Very, very few. But that’s probably right out of the #MeToo way of
> thinking. The ultimate point is that they did not get out of this thing what
> they wanted to get. And I have not forgotten Savannah Guthrie, audio sound
> bite No. 18. Here she is on the Today show today talking to the lawyer for
> Stormy Daniels, Michael Avenatti.
>
> GUTHRIE: You tweeted a picture of a DVD or a CD suggesting that there was
> going to be more evidence. That’s the suggestion, right? You don’t disagree.
>
> AVENATTI: And there will be more evidence.
>
> GUTHRIE: And now you’re being coy and not saying it. Seems like you’re playing
> games.
>
> AVENATTI: I’m not playing games. There will be more evidence. It’s just not
> gonna happen right now. Everyone wants immediate gratification. It’s not gonna
> happen right now.
>
> https://youtu.be/4U_cHinMD4c
>
> RUSH: Hey, Mr. Avenatti, if you don’t drop the bomb on the fur, you’re never
> gonna get an audience this size again. There’s nothing there. This whole thing
> was a come-on to drive up the audience for this thing for whatever purpose
> they wanted.
>
> Now, you want to hear a little sick? You want to hear a little sick from CNN?
> This Little Brian Stelter. He’s their media analyst. Hang on. He is their
> media analyst, and he is doing a bit of sexual analysis and explaining how
> Trump does things. This was last night, CNN’s Newsroom. I assume this is after
> the interview had aired. Listen to this.
>
> STELTER: It’s so uncomfortable that Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels have
> both said that this father compared these women to his daughter when he’s
> about to have sex with people. That’s what makes this so uncomfortable. There
> is a moral vacuum in this presidency. We are reminded of that tonight. And
> don’t all of us wonder as we go to bed, what do we tell our kids?
>
> RUSH: What? So Brian has deduced that when Trump’s on the verge of having sex
> with women, he tells them how much they remind him of his daughter. You know
> what you’re supposed to think of that. You’re supposed to think, what a sicko,
> this Trump guy is a real sicko, that’s so uncomfortable to see this. What are
> we supposed to tell our kids? Well, why don’t you tell ’em to stop dropping
> the F-bomb while trying to take away people’s constitutional rights in a
> stupid march on the Saturday afternoon in Washington? Why don’t you try that?
>
> BREAK TRANSCRIPT
>
> RUSH: This is from 1998, from a magazine called the New Republic. It’s a
> left-wing journal of opinion, and it’s titled, “The End of Privacy — How Bill
> Clinton lost the right to be left alone. — ‘It’s not their business,’ Monica
> Lewinsky allegedly told Linda Tripp, explaining why she was inclined to lie to
> Paula Jones’s lawyers about her relationship with President Clinton… ‘It’s not
> their business.’
>
> “And Lewinsky was, of course, correct. There is something totalitarian about
> the invasions of privacy that have transfixed the nation during the past week,
> as lawyers for Paula Jones have issued subpoenas to compel all women who have
> crossed President Clinton’s path to discuss their sex lives under oath, and as
> Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr has used his subpoena power to compel the
> president’s personal secretary to describe illicit activities in the White
> House that she may have observed.”
>
> So during the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal, the Drive-Bys were out there saying,
> “It’s nobody’s business! It’s just sex. It didn’t get in the way of him
> leading, didn’t get in the way of him doing his job. Hillary Clinton didn’t
> care about it; so it’s none of our business.” Has anybody heard anything like
> that involving Trump? It’s just like when Obama Hoovers up every user’s data
> on Facebook — when Obama’s digital team gets everybody’s data, every Facebook
> user’s data — they’re called geniuses. They’re called brilliant. They’re said
> to be setting the path for the future.
>
> When a conservative group ends up with the user data of 50 million — not 2
> billion, 50 million — users on Facebook, “Why, this is intolerable! This may
> be a crime! We cannot permit this.” So when the left wants everybody’s user
> data, it’s genius and right. When conservatives get in on the act, somehow
> it’s criminal. And with Bill Clinton, “It’s nobody’s business!” With Trump,
> it’s everybody’s business.
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May,
2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an
Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS

dolf

unread,
Mar 26, 2018, 7:33:06 PM3/26/18
to
Sorry that was Cooper—should get intent right!

dolf <dolf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 60 MINUTES ON STORMY DANIELS WITH ANDERSON COOPER?

dolf

unread,
Mar 26, 2018, 10:16:05 PM3/26/18
to
What use is your T.U.R.D. non sequitur opinion since I gave all necessary
cites.

THEREFORE THIS STATEMENT OF YOURS IS SIMPLY WRONG:

“Never heard of it.”

YOU HAVE HEARD OF IT SH@T FOR BRAINS.

- dolf

Lions Growl of Butchers Foul <screamin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Never heard of it.
> Wouldn't watch this kind of sh!t if you paid me.
>

dolf <dolf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry that was Cooper—should get intent right!
>
> dolf <dolf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 60 MINUTES ON STORMY DANIELS WITH ANDERSON COOPER?
>>
>> Wrong show mate!

dolf

unread,
Mar 27, 2018, 8:34:42 PM3/27/18
to
— LABOUR'S TOM WATSON CONFRONTED ON LIVE TV WITH 'GROTESQUE' ANTISEMITIC
MURAL THAT JEREMY CORBYN COMMENTED ON

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 28 March 2018

<https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/labours-tom-watson-confronted-live-12249522>

I this week went to ANZ Bank and asked in relation to the Royal Commission
into the Banking System whether they were aware of the #72 - Anthropic
Prototype and the binomial as HETEROS basis to coinage {#224} and that this
metaphysical stratum exists beneath their 64 bit sapient understanding of
#NUMBER and for which we have an #288 - UMBRA by which one can determine
#FRAUD from transactional meta-data.

He was not so aware.

I have previously noted that we now have a technical capability to further
redefine the granularity of our hypothetical proposition: 'AUTONOMOUS
HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY' which was articulated some months ago.

And that is the capability of reducing each conceptual word of our
functional dialectic by which one can also readily cognize a poem or
propose into its own sub-dialectic semantical stratum and obtain thereby
the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set.

For example our first dialectic element is:

#1 = Position {#558}

And if written thusly:

[P, o, s, i, t, i, o, n]

Then is numerically as gematria equivalent to:

[70, 60, 100, 9, 200, 9, 60, 50] = #558

But as a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set it is expressed as:

POSITION@{
#1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
#2: Sup: 49; Ego: 60,
#3: Sup: 68; Ego: 19,
#4: Sup: 77; Ego: 9,
#5: Sup: 34; Ego: 38,
#6: Sup: 43; Ego: 9,
#7: Sup: 22; Ego: 60,
#8: Sup: 72; Ego: 50,
Male: 435; Female: 315
}

#315 as [#5, #300, #10] = eti (G2089): {#14 as #315} 1) yet, still; 1a) of
time; 1a1) of a thing which went on formerly, whereas now a different state
of things exists or has begun to exist; 1a2) of a thing which continues at
present; 1a2a) even, now; 1a3) with negatives; 1a3a) no longer, no more;
1b) of degree and increase; 1b1) even, yet; 1b2) besides, more, further

*THUS* *AN* *INTER-OPERATIVE* *FRAMEWORK* *FOR* *LEGISLATIVE* *COMPLIANCE*
can be established and determined by applying a rule set approach to the
ISOmetric dialectic of our AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY such as
POSITION@{}, POISE@{} etc or whatever other rules might apply.

PERSONALISM  (noun):
- Also called personal idealism: is a modern philosophical movement
locating
ultimate value and reality in persons, human or divine.
- PSYCHOLOGY: an approach stressing individual personality as the central
concern of psychology.

— AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY {ie. *SANDGLASS* AND WHY
AUSTRALIA'S PARLIAMENT USES IT WHEN THERE'S A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE} —

#1 = Position {#558}
#2 = Poise {#244} / Pause {#476}
#3 = Purpose {#695}
#4 = Process {#428}
#5 = Pairing {#236} / DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE)
#6 = Perspicacity {#1260} / BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS)
#7 = Probability {#1173} / Prosperous {945} / MANIFESTING NORM (NORMA
DENUNTIANS)
#8 = Propriety {#1294} / TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
#9 = Persona {#376} / AUTONOMOUS PARADIGM

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html?OVERVIEW>

You are not talking about a deficiency {

ie. I do not confuse issues of knowledge pragmatics with a reliance upon
specific insight as a dependent regard for the sapient expertise of others

} run economy but something altogether viably different and sustainable.

Imagine then, if some one billion persons performed such core revenue
inducing tasks at a cost of $1 per day for every day of the year as then
proportionally shared between sovereign states rather than any individual
or corporation—the STATE after all is the provider of this ratiocination
architecture which fully conforms by Letters Patent to the COMMONWEALTH's
entirety of legislative framework and the Corporations would by impetus of
innovation, then competitively deploy it accordingly

That if the Jewish people have historically been bound to being a vassal of
Roman Empire governance with their own #72 anthropic prototype association
to the tripartite sacred names of GOD then it is a fable to portray Jewish
bankers in the manner of the picture.

The tripartite [Exodus 14:19-21] x #72 are more properly considered within
Kabbalistic terms as the #72 names of GOD which are a distinct
QUASI-NUCLEUS orbital transformation prototype as either a transportation
as chariot or a self-preservation contrivance (ie. not mythos derived) of
their implicit neural linguistic identity but which being expressed as
ordinal values is then able to be subject to further redaction either as a
total summation.

I’ve tightened up the language here on the use of the term: NON-NUCLEUS
which is tangential {ie.

1. pertaining to or of the nature of a tangent; being or moving in the
direction of a tangent.
2. merely touching; slightly connected: tangential information.

} and what we want to express as a priority emphasis is the capacity to
further redact the milesian ordinal values to their GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
instruction set which is descriptively NUCLEUS and hence then the more
proper use of the term QUASI-NUCLEUS.

For example [#200, #1, #5] % 81 = #44 as a TETRAGRAMMATON or by its
computed dialectic so that the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set is fully
derived:

LOSTANDFOUND@{
#1: Sup: 38; Ego: 38,
#2: Sup: 39; Ego: 1,
#3: Sup: 44; Ego: 5,
Male: 121; Female: 44
}

The #72 Names of GOD are not actual words in the truest sense but a
directive. With a few exceptions, they are not pronounceable in any
meaningful way. Their particular configurations are thought void of little
meaning excepting for their re-grafting into the noumenon as being the
GODHEAD consciousness by an articulation of its GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
instruction set:

Nous: #13
Time: 00:25 hrs
Date: 2018.3.27
Torah: #200 #1 #5 %81 = #44
Dao: Status, Loathing Shame
Tetra: #17 - Holding Back
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving

Latin: Compatiens {God who sees all} Alt: Salyah {Measure Out the Law of
God} {

1. HELPS FIND LOST OR STOLEN OBJECTS & MAKE KNOWN WHO REMOVED THEM
2. RENOWN, FORTUNE & SUCCESSION
3. LAWS & JUDGES
4. Chontare
}
#1105 CE

Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#301 / #296} / HETEROS {#293 / #292}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{121}&date:2018.3.27>

.jackNote@zen: 2, row: 1, col: 4, nous: 13 [Date: 2018.3.27, Super: #301 /
#25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious; I-Ching: H62 - Minor
Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small,
Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness, Distortion, Ego: #296 / #13 -
Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back]

#2, #70, #7, #2, #600 = `azab (H5800): {#54 as #121} 1) to leave, loose,
forsake; 2) to restore, repair; 1a) (Qal) to leave; 1a1) to depart from,
leave behind, leave, let alone; 1a2) to leave, abandon, forsake, neglect,
apostatise; 1a3) to let loose, set free, let go, free; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1)
to be left to; 1b2) to be forsaken; 1c) (Pual) to be deserted; 2a) (Qal) to
repair;

#6, #10, #5, #80, #500 = haphak (H2015): {#3 as #121} 1) to turn,
overthrow, overturn; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to overturn, overthrow; 1a2) to turn,
turn about, turn over, turn around; 1a3) to change, transform; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to turn oneself, turn, turn back; 1b2) to change oneself;
1b3) to be perverse; 1b4) to be turned, be turned over, be changed, be
turned against; 1b5) to be reversed; 1b6) to be overturned, be overthrown;
1b7) to be upturned; 1c) (Hithpael); 1c1) to transform oneself; 1c2) to
turn this way and that, turn every way; 1d) (Hophal) to turn on someone;

#6, #5, #70, #600 = `am (H5971): {#14 as #121} 1) nation, people; 2)
kinsman, kindred; 1a) people, nation; 1b) persons, members of one's people,
compatriots, country-men;

#30, #1, #30, #5, #10, #5, #600 = 'elohiym (H430): {#15 as #121} 1)
(plural); 2) (plural intensive - singular meaning); 1a) rulers, judges; 1b)
divine ones; 1c) angels; 1d) gods; 2a) god, goddess; 2b) godlike one; 2c)
works or special possessions of God; 2d) the (true) God; 2e) God;

#10, #80, #30, #1 = pala' (H6381): {#20 as #121} 1) to be marvellous, be
wonderful, be surpassing, be extraordinary, separate by distinguishing
action; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to be beyond one's power, be difficult to do;
1a2) to be difficult to understand; 1a3) to be wonderful, be extraordinary;
1a3a) marvellous (participle); 1b) (Piel) to separate (an offering); 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to do extraordinary or hard or difficult thing; 1c2) to make
wonderful, do wondrously; 1d) (Hithpael) to show oneself wonderful or
marvellous;

#40, #30, #1, #20, #10, #500 = mal'ak (H4397): {#21 as #121} 1) messenger,
representative; 1a) messenger; 1b) angel; 1c) the theophanic angel;

#1, #4, #50, #10, #50, #6 = 'adown (H113): {#35 as #121} 1) firm, strong,
lord, master; 1a) lord, master; 1a1) reference to men; 1a1a) superintendent
of household,of affairs; 1a1b) master; 1a1c) king; 1a2) reference to God;
1a2a) the Lord God; 1a2b) Lord of the whole earth; 1b) lords, kings; 1b1)
reference to men; 1b1a) proprietor of hill of Samaria; 1b1b) master; 1b1c)
husband; 1b1d) prophet; 1b1e) governor; 1b1f) prince; 1b1g) king; 1b2)
reference to God; 1b2a) Lord of lords (probably = 'thy husband, Yahweh');
1c) my lord, my master; 1c1) reference to men; 1c1a) master; 1c1b) husband;
1c1c) prophet; 1c1d) prince; 1c1e) king; 1c1f) father; 1c1g) Moses; 1c1h)
priest; 1c1i) theophanic angel; 1c1j) captain; 1c1k) general recognition of
superiority; 1c2) reference to God; 1c2a) my Lord,my Lord and my God; 1c2b)
Adonai (parallel with Yahweh);

#6, #5, #70, #30, #10 = `alah (H5927): {#37 as #121} 1) to go up, ascend,
climb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to go up, ascend; 1a2) to meet, visit, follow,
depart, withdraw, retreat; 1a3) to go up, come up (of animals); 1a4) to
spring up, grow, shoot forth (of vegetation); 1a5) to go up, go up over,
rise (of natural phenomenon); 1a6) to come up (before God); 1a7) to go up,
go up over, extend (of boundary); 1a8) to excel, be superior to; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be taken up, be brought up, be taken away; 1b2) to take
oneself away; 1b3) to be exalted; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to bring up, cause to
ascend or climb, cause to go up; 1c2) to bring up, bring against, take
away; 1c3) to bring up, draw up, train; 1c4) to cause to ascend; 1c5) to
rouse, stir up (mentally); 1c6) to offer, bring up (of gifts); 1c7) to
exalt; 1c8) to cause to ascend, offer; 1d) (Hophal); 1d1) to be carried
away, be led up; 1d2) to be taken up into, be inserted in; 1d3) to be
offered; 1e) (Hithpael) to lift oneself;

#6, #1, #70, #40, #4 = `amad (H5975): {#38 as #121} 1) to stand, remain,
endure, take one's stand; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to stand, take one's stand, be in
a standing attitude, stand forth, take a stand, present oneself, attend
upon, be or become servant of; 1a2) to stand still, stop (moving or doing),
cease; 1a3) to tarry, delay, remain, continue, abide, endure, persist, be
steadfast; 1a4) to make a stand, hold one's ground; 1a5) to stand upright,
remain standing, stand up, rise, be erect, be upright; 1a6) to arise,
appear, come on the scene, stand forth, appear, rise up or against; 1a7) to
stand with, take one's stand, be appointed, grow flat, grow insipid; 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to station, set; 1b2) to cause to stand firm, maintain; 1b3)
to cause to stand up, cause to set up, erect; 1b4) to present (one) before
(king); 1b5) to appoint, ordain, establish; 1c) (Hophal) to be presented,
be caused to stand, be stood before;

Secondly, the Hebrew word for letter actually means ‘pulse’ or ‘vibration’.

YOUTUBE: “ET PHONE HOME”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FLXqkL9MPM>

What’s now pulsating?

And what’s then begun vibrating in response?

“And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool
of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the
LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.

And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?

And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I
was naked; and I hid myself.

And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the
tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?” [Genesis
3:8-11 (KJV)]

Third, these universal meditation symbols are thought to transcend
religion, race geography and the very concept of language. [Yehuda Berg,
The 72 Names of God, p 38]

“And I John {the grace or mercy of the Lord} saw the holy city, new
Jerusalem {vision of peace: PERSONALISTICS AND THE EXCHANGE 9x9x9 OF
META-DATA BETWEEN AGENCIES}, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared
as a bride adorned for her husband.

And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of
God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people,
and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.

And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no
more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more
pain: for the former things are passed away.

And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he
said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.

And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega {ie. this is not
Pythagorean esoteric magic sum redaction: 9-1-1}, the beginning and the end
{ie.

Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a genuine
Sabbath based PARADIGM of INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS [Exodus 20:8;
Deuteronomy 5:15]

}. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of
life freely.

He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he
shall be my son.

But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and
whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their
part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second
death.” [Revelation 21:2-8 (KJV)]

From an existentialist viewpoint you are looking at the need for the 9x9x9
as #729 / 2 = 364.5 as #81 x 4.5 days of the _GIZMO{} array as the
definitive container to then be deployed for the intra application / inter
agency fluidity exchange of data by legislation defining the TETRAD
mechanism:

#10 / #10 = Totality of Nature {#7 - Engendering Nature} / SOVEREIGNTY

#11 / #8 = Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in it's Nature
{#7 - Engendering Nature}) / GOVERNMENT & NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS

#12 / #9 = Autonomous Nature / GENERAL POPULACE

#13 / #1 - Nature contains Nature {MOTHER: *PERSONALISTICS* *AND* *THE*
*EXCHANGE* 9x9x9 *OF* *META*-*DATA* *BETWEEN* *AGENCIES*}

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DIALECT-FORMULATION.jpg>

This is just a thought so as to give specifics to an optimal outcome which
needs the expertise of others so as to come into fruition by assisting
within the legislative establishment of that quintessential #CENTRE of
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS articulated by egalitarian distribution
of #NUMBER as the _GIZMO{} 9x9x9 array as definitive container to then be
deployed for the intra application / inter agency fluidity exchange of data
by legislation definition as framework whereby Corporations would by
impetus of innovation, then competitively deploy it accordingly.

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.

Are you now smart enough to work out how this mechanism as fiscal #8 -
TRANSFORMATIVE HETEROS PROTOTYPE / #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE might be best
deployed for #BREXIT as HOMOIOS worldview?

DOLF @ 2339 HOURS ON 25 MARCH 2018: "Thus you can see how quickly fear
spreads and it’s limit is entirely proportional to the degree of
irrationality in others.

I also laud recent United States legislative measure to inhibit sexual
exploitation upon Craigslist where criminality is too easily associated to
sexuality which whilst it may involve physical assailment, lack of
integrity and deception it is particularly maleficent because sexual
identity is core to one’s being and psyche.

And to curb Palestinian AID so as to bring them to a proper and wholesome
contrition where peace has a probability.

You have here a facilitated change upon a pivotal proximity which then
grants opportunity to circumscribe reality.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Water%20Boarding.pdf>

Thus by being so pragmatically descriptive am I then inclusive and
remaining or exclusive and abstaining?

It’s a trick question.

Do you know the meaning and consequence to the following statement:

#390 = 4th July 1776 {HOMOIOS} v’s #288 = 11th September 2001 {HETEROS} as
validated by a trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon being compliant
with Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason 1781 (first edition) / 1787
(second edition).

But my statement is a solution to NOT only America’s $trillion debt
problem.

And secondly it is a solution to the racial problem which in conclusion was
recently expressed in the instance of a field test as 'SLAVE MENTALITY'
poetry being the exercise of a determined willed and voluntary focus of
thought upon a specific Daemon/Angel which is temporally mapped to the 4th
July being the *GENETHLIAC* day of celebration for American Independence:

— A SLAVE MENTALITY —

"TIPS FOR PAY.
TO THIS DAY,
SO I SAY,
POVERTY PREYS."

*GENETHLIAC* (adjective):
- Astrology: of or relating to birthdays or to the position of the stars at
one's birth.
- Word of the Day for 26 March 2018; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com

ORIGIN: If any word occurs exclusively in grad school seminars, papers,
theses, and dissertations, genethliac is that word. The Latin adjective and
noun genethliacus “pertaining to one’s hour of birth or a birthday; an
astrologer who calculates such an hour or day,” is an extension of the
Greek adjective genethliakós “pertaining to a birthday.” Latin also
possesses a noun genethliacon “birthday poem,” derived from but not
existing in Greek. Birthdays and birthday celebrations were bigger affairs
among Roman men than among the Greeks because one’s birthday also involved
the cult of the genius, the attendant spirit or “guardian angel,” so to
speak, of every freeborn male but especially of the paterfamilias. Latin
genethliaca “birthday poems” arose as a distinct genre in the first century
b.c. Genethliac entered English in the 16th century.

It was an undeniable refutation of the FASCIST inspiring German Philosopher
Martin Heidegger (1889-1976), I demonstrated that the theoretic concept of
a metaphysical noumenon as the basis to 'Metaphor, Essence and Origin of
Language' by the thinking of a human being--is proven to be true.

The neo-fascists such as (but not limited to) Government Shill #2
<gov....@gmail.com>, <screamin...@gmail.com> and BDK
<Con...@Worldcontrol.com> whose responses exhibit an obsessive compulsive
disordered dialog of repetitive dissolution, dissimilation, narcissistic
nihilism and devolution into depravity rather than the freedom they claim
to advocate as a MASQUERADED virtue is entirely a contempt made of the
person’s dignity by habitual conduct of self entitlement and pursuit of
entertainment which ought to be also considered unlawful.

I place this liberty of yours into the perversity quadrant of hedonistic
licentiousness rather than extolling freedom, liberty and egalitarian
equality.

"And when they were come, they said unto him, 'Master, we know that thou
art true, and carest for no man: for thou regardest not the person of men,
but teachest the way of God in truth: Is it lawful to give tribute to
Caesar, or not?

Shall we give, or shall we not give? But he, knowing their hypocrisy, said
unto them, Why tempt ye me? Bring me a penny {denarion-penny [G1220]:
#293; plural is *PENCE*}, that I may see it.

And they brought it. And he saith unto them, 'Whose is the image and the
*superscription* (EPIGRAPHĒ: an inscription)?'

— MY TR[I]UMP[HANT] MAN-CHOO —

Written by Dolf Boek on 7 November 2016

“HE IS A BILLIONAIRE.
BUT WE THE MEANS.
AND TECHNO-WARE.
SHAFT YOUR SPLEEN {bad temper; spite}.
WITH WANTON CARE.
A $6 *MILL* CLEAN.
HIS TOOL TO BARE.”

<http://www.grapple369.com/?OVERVIEW>

The term Man-choo is a play on words:

-- The Manchurian Candidate (1959), by Richard Condon, is a political
thriller novel about the son of a prominent U.S. political family who is
brainwashed into being an *UNWITTING* *ASSASSIN* *FOR* *A* *COMMUNIST*
*CONSPIRACY*

-- The Chinese name Choo relates to Alpha Arae (α Arae, α Ara) is the
second brightest star in the southern constellation of Ara;

-- In ancient Greek mythology, Ara was identified as the altar where the
gods first made offerings and formed an alliance before defeating the
Titans.

The term *MILL* is also a play on words:

-- the $6 million man is an American science fiction and action television
series about a former astronaut, Colonel Steve Austin, portrayed by
American actor Lee Majors. Austin has superhuman strength due to bionic
implants and is employed as a secret agent by a fictional U.S. government
office titled OSI.

-- a *MILL* is a thousandth part compared with cent or a penny/denarii
which is a magical feature within my pre-United States of America 43rd
Presidential elections on 8 November, 2016 as a chapter concerning the
Biblical text: [Mark 12:14-17 (KJV)]

The inscription reads 'Ti[berivs] Caesar Divi Avg[vsti] F[ilivs] Avgvstvs'
('Caesar Augustus Tiberius, son of the Divine Augustus'), claiming that
Augustus {increased, augmented} was a god. The reverse shows a seated
female, usually identified as Livia {blue, envious} depicted as Pax {the
Roman goddess of peace, the equivalent of the Greek Eirene}.

Livia Drusilla (Classical Latin: LIVIA DRVSILLA, LIVIA AVGVSTA) 30 January
58 BCE – 28 September #29 CE), also known as Julia {downy; soft and tender
hair; youthful} Augusta {increased, augmented} after her formal adoption
into the Julian family in #14 CE, was the wife of the Roman emperor
Augustus (27 BCE - #14 CE) throughout his reign, as well as his adviser.

She was the mother of the emperor Tiberius {the son of Tiber} (#14 CE to
#37 CE), paternal grandmother of the emperor Claudius {lame; crippled} (#41
to #54 CE), paternal great-grandmother of the emperor Caligula {little
soldier's boot, the diminutive form of caliga, hob-nailed military boot},
and maternal great-great-grandmother of the emperor Nero {strong, vigorous}
(#54 to #68 CE).

She was deified by Claudius who acknowledged her title of Augusta.

However, it has been suggested that denarii were not in common circulation
in Judaea during Jesus' lifetime and that other coins may have instead been
an Antiochan tetradrachm." [Wikipedia 2016:Tribute_penny; Livia]

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribute_penny>

And they said unto him, 'Caesar's.'

ANGEL GENIE CORRESPONDENCES TO MOON (#369 = DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN
NATURE) AS ACT OF NATURE AND THE ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE)

48 8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels) = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120
#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 <-- [#4, #70, #20, #10,
#40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224} 1) *ACCEPTED*,
*PARTICULARLY* *OF* *COINS* *AND* *MONEY*; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in, dig; to search
out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a hole; n.
Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} SHEBA {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*; *REPOSE*; *OATH;

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

And Jesus answering said unto them, 'Render to Caesar the things that are
Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.'

And they marvelled at him.'" [Mark 12:15]

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>

[IMAGE: I'm getting one of the special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE"
half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

"Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power
but of God: the POWERS-EXOUSIA that be are ORDAINED-TASSO (ie. to arrange
in an orderly manner, that is, assign or dispose [to a certain position or
lot]:--addict, appoint, determine, ordain, set) of God.

Whosoever therefore resisteth the POWER-EXOUSIA, resisteth the
ORDINANCE-DIATAGĒ (ie. arrangement, that is, institution:--instrumentality)
of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then
not be afraid of the POWER-EXOUSIA?

*POWER* {EXOUSIA: #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS
NATURE: {ZAYIN / *PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. Exousia - (in the sense of ability);
privilege, that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom,
or (objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate,
*token* *of* *control*), delegated influence:--authority, jurisdiction,
liberty, power, right, strength)}}

Do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is
the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be
afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of
God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for
conscience sake.

For this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending
continually upon this very thing.

Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom
to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour." [Romans 13:1-7
(KJV)]

- dolf

Initial Post: 25 March 2018

Lions Growl of Butchers Foul <screamin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 1:16:05 PM UTC+11, dolf wrote:
>> What use is your T.U.R.D. non sequitur opinion since I gave all necessary
>> cites.
>>
>> THEREFORE THIS STATEMENT OF YOURS IS SIMPLY WRONG:
>>
>> “Never heard of it.”
>>
>> YOU HAVE HEARD OF IT SH@T FOR BRAINS.
>
> Actually, I haven't. I haven't watched any TV for months, and it's been
> years since I sat down in front of a TV and wasted my time trying to watch something.
>
> So although "60 minutes" means to me, "crap TV show packed with ad
> breaks", I have no idea what a "60 minutes on Stormy Daniels with
> Anderson Cooper" could be about, and I actively reject any thought of wanting to.
>
> I am curious about why the smartest human being on Earth, aka Dolf Boek,
> aka Rudolph Bakker, aka [censored], would be watching sh!t shows on TV
> aimed at people with subnormal IQs...
0 new messages