-- (DRAFT #4) METACOGNITION: TOWARDS ADOPTING A JURISPRUDENTIAL DEFINITION OF *SAPIENT* DISCRIMINATING NORM APPLICABLE TO HUMANS AND MACHINE ALIKE AS REQUISITE FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

[dolf]

-- (DRAFT) METACOGNITION: TOWARDS ADOPTING A JURISPRUDENTIAL DEFINITION
OF *SAPIENT* DISCRIMINATING NORM APPLICABLE TO HUMANS AND MACHINE ALIKE
AS REQUISITE FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 25 June 2018

I’ve recently implemented the PSEUDO #NINE quadrants for both the
HETEROS (incremented by 1 as #1 / #73 substitution) and TORAH
(incremented by 3 {ie. *DOST* *THOU* *STEAL*? #73 - *COMPLETION*, #74 -
*CLOSURE*, #75 - *FAILURE*}) prototypes that are associated to the #231
- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL perspective of ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE and
ensured that these covert fallacy exceptions as negation point to the
correct z, x, y coordinates within the _GIZMO{} array:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

DOLF @ 0454 HOURS ON 25 JUNE 2018: "I want to now make a further
clarification on what is still a hypothetical ethereal (ie. it is
neither asceticism nor mysticism although that does not exclude any
function of ritual transcendence) observation of the cognitive process
having an unity of apperception possessing “an unique cogent capacity of
the sapient being to know by means of prognosticative supranatural
intuition.”

It is reasonable to say then that the best attenuation of the mind
occurs when optimal assimilation is facilitated of the MATERIA PRIMA as
the Categories of Understanding prerequisite to the measure of reality
in addition to those that are an accumulation of our life experience and
in the same manner such as from any conspicuous idea as for example the
emendation (ie. I’m here describing a neural linguistic process) of an
artificial limb within the quintessence of our BEING.

That MODERNUS as the organization of the myriad ‘Things or institutions
of the present' is intrinsically about human nature’s capacity by its
discriminating norm {#369} to facilitate the exercise of intuition in
the practiced consideration of moderation {ie. modo: (just now’)
originally ablative of modus: (‘measure’)} within the permissibility of
boundaries.

I’ve already broadly sketched this out within previous statements
concerning the proposed DIALECTIC as reverse transcriptase inhibitor
conformin to the syncretic perennialist perspective:

@4 - #VIRTUE:
@3 - #TOOLS:
@2 - #POSITION:
@1 - #TIME:
@5 - #CANON:

The observation of the theoretical notion of cosmic elasticity as
intrinsic to the conception of a measured reality is then made in
relation to the process of instantiation within the temporality by a
consideration of whether in the circumstance of *DILEMMA* this occurs as
being entirely a promiscuous {ie. demonstrating or implying an
un-selective approach; indiscriminate or casual} processes as
primitivistic opportunism and survivalist ‘street savvy’ or as a
definitive function of reflexology {ie.
ignited by a hot zone within the noumena prism of possibilities} itself
where the scope as degree of probability as the permissibility of any
consequence that is determinate and obtained both from the meta-data
descriptors and the mundane content of any responses made to the
consideration of such as attempts to preserve the self ego as formula of
autonomy within the transit of the continuum as the fabric to time itself.

*DILEMMA* (noun):
- A situation requiring a choice between equally undesirable alternatives.
- Any difficult or perplexing situation or problem.
- [Logic]: A form of meta-dialectic syllogism *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *TEN*
*COMMANDMENTS* (*NOMOS* *COMPRISING* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *TETRAD*
*ENCOMPASSING* *OUR* *NOMENCLATURE* *AND* *BASIS* *TO* *INTELLECTUS*
*AS* *GENITIVE* *VOLUNTĀTIS*:

#A {Major Premise},
#B {Minor Premise},
#C {Assumptive Proposition},
#D {Restatement of a Sacred / Sovereign Principle}

In which the major premise is formed of two or more hypothetical
propositions and the minor premise is a disjunctive proposition, as 'IF
#A {#1 - Nature Contains Nature} THEN #B {#2 - Nature Rejoices in its
Nature};

IF #C {#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature} THEN #D {#4 - Nature Amended in its
Nature}.

EITHER #A OR #C.
THEREFORE, EITHER #B OR #D.'

In short the *DILEMMA* is if given #A, and I am #B, it can't possibly be
#ME (#A = #B) as #C (co-joined), then it must be #D (as distinct) from #ME.

H5381@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 62 (#67); Ego: 57 (#62),
@3: Sup: 72 (#139); Ego: 10 (#72),
@4: Sup: 75 (#214); Ego: 3 (#75),
@5: Sup: 81 (#295); Ego: 6 (#81),
@6: Sup: 50 (#345); Ego: 50 (#131),
@7: Sup: 60 (#405); Ego: 10 (#141),
Male: #405; Feme: #141
} // #384

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #353 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;

THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.

#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185

[Origin 1515–25 CE: Late Latin from Greek dílēmma, equivalent to di +
lêmma an assumption, premise, derivative of lambánein to take {#384 =
[#5, #300, #10, #3, #6, #50, #10] = nasag (H5381): {#1 as #353 % #41 =
#25} 1) to reach, overtake, take hold upon; 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) to
overtake; 1a2) to reach, attain to, cause to reach; 1a3) to be able to
secure, reach, have enough}.

But just now an ethereal thought on how to remedy this promiscuous /
daemonic self righteous circumstance {#5 - Act of Nature} as
consequential abrogation of individual integrity {#1 - Nature Contains
Nature}, loss of popularity {#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature},
avoidance of inextricable *DILEMMA* {#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature} and
to facilitate subtle intuition {#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature} which
is causal to being within the space / time dynamic in promulgating an
unimpeded process that in this example of reading, is the traversal of
consciousness within the fabric of time itself.

MATTB (TRDEL...@GMAIL.COM) @ 0604 HOURS ON 25 JUNE 2018: "When I read
this I knew you would get your 6 page response ;-))).

Dolf is strange."

DOLF @ 0616 HOURS ON 25 JUNE 2018: "Speech to you is like defecating
where pressing the send button is no different to wiping your arse and
that’s where your accountability ends.

Your only accomplishment is a still birth, arsewipe!

The propositional consideration with respects to the metacognitive
process is whether superficiality or causal self justification exhibits
the characteristics (as learned behaviour) where a neural linguistic
correspondence exists between the meta-descriptor prototypes, the
stoicheion and it’s non-sapient extrusion as ostensibly either
platitudinal, mantric, sycophantic or an irrationality.

Historically this is also a consideration which the #509 - YAHAD Dead
Sea Scroll Community applied a non-preterist interpretation of the 612
BCE originating prophecies of [Nahum 2:11-3:13] concerning: "THOSE WHO
MISDIRECT EPHRAIM {fruitful; increasing: #15 ... #34 ... #65 ... #111
... #175 ... #260 ... #369}: WHO WITH THEIR FRAUDULENT TEACHING AND
LYING TONGUE AND PERFIDIOUS LIP MISDIRECT MANY; *KINGS*, PRINCES,
PRIESTS AND PEOPLE TOGETHER WITH THE PROSELYTE {ie. #509 - YAHAD AS
THOSE WHOM BECAME JUDAISED} ATTACHED TO THEM." [cf: 4Q169]

H3054@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 *); Ego: 10 (#126), <-- *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 *); Ego: 4 (#135 ), <-- *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345
/ #405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER]
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 *); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5
as #19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised

Thus as a rationalism can the meta-descriptors prototypes themselves as
prerequisite to any metacognitive process, be further modulated by a
subjective measure as prerogative use made of language? For example:

22 x Hebrew letters
24 x Greek letters (* I haven’t resolved those prototypes)
26 x English letters

#A (#1 - *SOUTH*) = {Inner?}
#E (#5 - #CENTRE) = {Totality?}
#I (#9 - *NORTH*) = {Sphere?}
#O (#60 - *EAST*) = {Polarity?}
#U (#300 - *WEST*) = {Harmony?}

#47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution

IN THESE EXAMPLES THE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IS A RUDIMENTARY FUNCTION AND
IT IS INSTINCTIVELY HARMONISED WITH THE RESPECTIVE STOICHEION PROTOTYPE
AS AN IRRATIONALITY RATHER THAN ACCOMPANYING ANY ACT OF REASONING:

#47 % 22 = 2 x 22 {ASSUMPTIVE PROPOSITION AS @3 - #TOOLS} + #3 - Nature
Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature {#5 - Act
of Nature}}

#47 % 26 = 1 x 26 {FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {RESTATEMENT OF A SACRED /
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE AS INSTANCE OF: 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 / #41 = #9 AS @4 -
#VIRTUE} + #21 / #9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability}
[#671 / #5 - Act of Nature]

DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

The term STOICHEION refers to the classical elements typically coveys to
the concepts in ancient Greece of earth, water, air, fire, and aether,
which were proposed to explain the nature and complexity of all matter
in terms of simpler substances. Ancient cultures in Babylonia, Japan,
Tibet, and India had similar lists, sometimes referring in local
languages to "air" as "wind" and the fifth element as "void". The
Chinese Wu Xing system lists Wood (木 mù), Fire (火 huǒ), Earth (土 tǔ),
Metal (金 jīn), and Water (水 shuǐ), though these are described more as
energies or transitions rather than as types of material.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_element>]

46 41 48
47 45 43
42 49 44 = #135 / #405 {FIRE - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS NORTH}

[#41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49] = #405

#FIRE@@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 2 (#43); Ego: 42 (#83),
@3: Sup: 45 (#88); Ego: 43 (#126),
@4: Sup: 8 (#96); Ego: 44 (#170),
@5: Sup: 53 (#149); Ego: 45 (#215),
@6: Sup: 18 (#167); Ego: 46 (#261),
@7: Sup: 65 (#232); Ego: 47 (#308),
@8: Sup: 32 (#264); Ego: 48 (#356),
@9: Sup: 81 (#345); Ego: 49 (#405),
Male: #345; Feme: #405
} // #405

42 47 46
49 45 41
44 43 48 = #135 / #405 {EARTH - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS EAST}

[#47, #44, #41, #48, #45, #42, #49, #46, #43] = #405

#EARTH@{
@1: Sup: 47 (#47); Ego: 47 (#47),
@2: Sup: 10 (#57); Ego: 44 (#91),
@3: Sup: 51 (#108); Ego: 41 (#132),
@4: Sup: 18 (#126); Ego: 48 (#180), <-- THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh
Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT*
*ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

@5: Sup: 63 (#189); Ego: 45 (#225),
@6: Sup: 24 (#213); Ego: 42 (#267),
@7: Sup: 73 (#286); Ego: 49 (#316),
@8: Sup: 38 (#324); Ego: 46 (#362),
@9: Sup: 81 (#405); Ego: 43 (#405),
Male: #405; Feme: #405
} // #405

<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:405>
44 49 42
43 45 47
48 41 46 = #135 / #405 {AIR - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS SOUTH}

[#49, #48, #47, #46, #45, #44, #43, #42, #41] = #405

#AIR@{
@1: Sup: 49 (#49); Ego: 49 (#49),
@2: Sup: 16 (#65 - *SOLDIER*); Ego: 48 (#97),
@3: Sup: 63 (#128); Ego: 47 (#144),
@4: Sup: 28 (#156); Ego: 46 (#190),
@5: Sup: 73 (#229); Ego: 45 (#235),
@6: Sup: 36 (#265); Ego: 44 (#279),
@7: Sup: 79 (#344); Ego: 43 (#322),
@8: Sup: 40 (#384); Ego: 42 (#364 - *ANTAGONISM* *TO* *THE* #509 -
*YAHAD* *COSMOLOGY* / *COMMANDMENTS* *OF* *GOD* / *INTELLECTUS* *AS*
*GENITIVE* *VOLUNTĀTUS*),
@9: Sup: 81 (#465); Ego: 41 (#405),
Male: #465; Feme: #405
}

48 43 44
41 45 49
46 47 42 = #135 / #405 {WATER - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS WEST}

[#43, #46, #49, #42, #45, #48, #41, #44, #47] = #405

#WATER@{
@1: Sup: 43 (#43); Ego: 43 (#43),
@2: Sup: 8 (#51); Ego: 46 (#89),
@3: Sup: 57 (#108 - *PROGENITOR*); Ego: 49 (#138),
@4: Sup: 18 (#126); Ego: 42 (#180), <-- THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh
Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT*
*ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

@5: Sup: 63 (#189); Ego: 45 (#225),
@6: Sup: 30 (#219); Ego: 48 (#273),
@7: Sup: 71 (#290); Ego: 41 (#314 *), <-- *LITMUS* *TEST* *FOR*
*PERJURY* UNDER SECTION #314 TO CRIMES ACT OF VICTORIA 1958
@8: Sup: 34 (#324); Ego: 44 (#358), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN*
*ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #FOUR:
#108 / #324 AS *PROGENTITOR*
@9: Sup: 81 (#405); Ego: 47 (#405),
Male: #405; Feme: #405
} // #405

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{135}&idea:{345}&idea:{405}&idea:{465}>

G52@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
@3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
@4: Sup: 43 (#102); Ego: 70 (#124),
@5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
@6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135),
@7: Sup: 11 (#220); Ego: 38 (#173),
Male: #220; Feme: #173
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
Tetra: 25 - Contention;

THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.

#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148

#335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {#9 as #135 %
#41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine things;
1b) of *MORAL* blindness;

THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY ON TETRA: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS {CORRELATES
WITH HUMAN'S MYSTERY; YIN; THE PHASE EARTH; AND I CHING HEXAGRAM NUMBER
H4 - YOUTHFUL FOLLY}

HEAD: Yang ch’i is first spied. Things like callow youths all still lack
understanding.

This tetragram, like the previous one, is assigned to the Spring Onset
solar period when plants and animals are expected to first emerge from
their winter homes. The title character describes young animals whose
horns have still not grown, the land still barren of vegetation, and
youths of either sex who still lack the characteristic development of
the heart/mind that makes people truly 'human.' {ie. HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN
[T]} The first signs of maturity now start to appear. So long as lack
of development is primarily a *FUNCTION* *OF* *TIME*, we can anticipate
the future happily. However, many promising trends may be nipped in the
bud if they are not nurtured by trained care-takers.

For this reason, this tetragram advises the youth (or one who is new to
any endeavour) to look for good teachers to guide the maturation
process. Certain mistakes are particularly associated with youth (such
as impetuosity and faulty judgment or indecision due to lack of
experience). Unless an appropriate master is found, such faults tend to
multiply over time, especially when the individual is intelligent. If a
person fails to locate a good teacher, “then if his studying has no
direction and his mind lacks penetration, he himself is to blame.” As
YANG HSIUNG states categorically in his other “classic,” the Model Sayings:

To work at study is not as good as to work at finding a teacher. A
teacher is a model for others. . . . Just as within a single noisy
market-place there are countless different ideas, within a book of a
single chapter there are countless different theories. For the
marketplace, a balance must be set up [to determine correct *weight* {ie.

"Tell it not in Gath {a wine-press}, publish it not in the streets of
Askelon {

H831@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 58 (#59); Ego: 57 (#58),
@3: Sup: 77 (#136); Ego: 19 (#77),
@4: Sup: 26 (#162); Ego: 30 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#194); Ego: 6 (#113),
@6: Sup: 1 (#195); Ego: 50 (#163),
Male: #195; Feme: #163
}

#487 as [#1, #300, #100, #30, #6, 350] = ʼAshqlown (H831): {#517 % #41 =
#25} 1) a *WEIGHTING* PLACE; *BALANCE* AS IMPLYING TERNARY NUMBER; fire
of infamy}; lest the daughters of the Philistines {those who dwell in
villages} rejoice, lest the daughters of the uncircumcised
{`arel-uncircumcised [H6189]: #390} triumph." [2Samuel 1:20 (KJV),
presumed written 630–540 BCE]

} and value], so for each book, a teacher must be set up.

In contrast to the corresponding Changes hexagram, which praises certain
childlike qualities, the Mystery censures the *PUERILE* {ie. MEMBRUM
VIRILE {manly, masculine, mature} v's MEMBRUM PUERILE {boyish, #231 -
*YOUTH*}}.

APPRAISAL 1: The fatuous youth is not awake.
Meeting us, he is blind and dim.7
FATHOMING 1: A *LOUTISH* *YOUTH* *WHO* *IS* *UNAWARE*
Means: We *FEAR* *HE'LL* *BE* *DARK* *UNTIL* *THE* *END*.

Appraisal 1 corresponds to the Beginning of Thought. The most important
task for the immature youth is to find a good teacher to train his
heart/mind. A Chinese pun identifies the teacher as “the first-awakened
one” who leads others to the Way. Here, unfortunately, Position 1
corresponds to *INAUSPICIOUS* *NIGHT* and so YANG HSIUNG *SPEAKS* *OF*
*DARKNESS*:

Either the inane youth selects teachers who are equally ignorant ("He
meets us, who are [also] blind and dim") or the immature youth fails to
heed his good teachers' words ("[Even after] meeting us, he is blind and
dim.") Under such conditions, no pupil can hope to gain enlightenment.
Unless he changes his ways, he is likely to remain doubly in the dark in
that he will be both 'unenlightened' and 'in obscurity.'

"NOW I SAY, THAT THE HEIR, AS LONG AS HE IS A CHILD, DIFFERETH NOTHING
FROM A SERVANT, THOUGH HE BE LORD {

KURIOS: From κυρος kuros (supremacy); supreme in authority, that is, (as
noun) controller; by implication Mr. (as a respectful title):—God, Lord,
master, Sir

} OF ALL;

BUT IS UNDER TUTORS AND GOVERNORS UNTIL THE TIME APPOINTED OF THE FATHER.

EVEN SO WE, WHEN WE WERE CHILDREN, WERE IN BONDAGE {

DOULOŌ: to enslave (literally or figuratively):--bring into (be under)
bondage, X given, become (make) servant

} UNDER THE ELEMENTS {

STOICHEION: something orderly in arrangement, that is, (by implication)
a serial (basal, fundamental, initial) constituent (literally),
proposition (figuratively):—element, principle, rudiment

} OF THE WORLD {

KOSMOS: orderly arrangement, that is, decoration; by implication the
world (in a wide or narrow sense, including its inhabitants, literally
or figuratively [morally]):—adorning, world

}: BUT WHEN THE FULNESS OF THE TIME WAS COME, GOD SENT FORTH HIS SON,
MADE OF A WOMAN, MADE UNDER THE LAW {

NOMOS: a primary word νέμω nemō (to parcel out, especially food or
grazing to animals); law (through the idea of prescriptive usage),
generally (regulation), specifically (of Moses [including the volume];
also of the Gospel), or figuratively (a principle):—law

}, TO REDEEM THEM THAT WERE UNDER THE LAW, THAT WE MIGHT RECEIVE THE
ADOPTION OF SONS. AND BECAUSE YE ARE SONS, GOD HATH SENT FORTH THE
SPIRIT OF HIS SON INTO YOUR HEARTS, CRYING, ABBA, FATHER. WHEREFORE
THOU ART NO MORE A SERVANT, BUT A SON; AND IF A SON, THEN AN HEIR OF GOD
THROUGH CHRIST.

HOWBEIT THEN, WHEN YE KNEW NOT GOD, YE DID SERVICE UNTO THEM WHICH BY
NATURE {

PHUSIS: growth (by germination or expansion), that is, (by implication)
natural production (lineal descent); by extension a genus or sort;
figuratively native disposition, constitution or usage:—([man-]) kind,
nature ([-al])

} ARE NO GODS.

BUT NOW, AFTER THAT YE HAVE KNOWN GOD, OR RATHER ARE KNOWN OF GOD, HOW
TURN YE AGAIN TO THE WEAK AND BEGGARLY ELEMENTS {

STOICHEION: something orderly in arrangement, that is, (by implication)
a serial (basal, fundamental, initial) constituent (literally),
proposition (figuratively):—element, principle, rudiment

}, WHEREUNTO YE DESIRE AGAIN TO BE IN BONDAGE?

YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES, AND YEARS.

I AM AFRAID OF YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
[Galatians 4:1-:11 (KJV)]

Jean Piaget (9 August 1896 – 16 September 1980) was the great pioneer of
the constructivist theory of knowing and his 1936 theory of cognitive
development explains how a child constructs a mental model of the world.
He disagreed with the idea that intelligence was a fixed trait, and
regarded cognitive development as a process which occurs due to
biological maturation and interaction with the environment.

In the elaboration of the logical model of intellectual development,
Piaget argued that intelligence develops in a series of stages that are
related to age and are progressive because one stage must be
accomplished before the next can occur. For each stage of development
the child forms a view of reality for that age period. At the next
stage, the child must keep up with earlier level of mental abilities to
reconstruct concepts. Piaget conceived intellectual development as an
upward expanding spiral in which children must constantly reconstruct
the ideas formed at earlier levels with new, higher order concepts
acquired at the next level.

It is primarily the “Third Piaget” (the logical model of intellectual
development) that was debated by American psychologists when Piaget’s
ideas were “rediscovered” in the 1960s.

*SUI* *JURIS* is a Latin phrase meaning “in one’s own right” as an
autonomous and sapient being. It means a person whom is able to make
contracts and sue others, or be sued himself within his own name. A
person as *SUI* *JURIS* is one whom is not bankrupt, mentally incapable
or a minor. It is the legal capacity to manage one’s own affairs. Most
adults are considered as *SUI* *JURIS*.”
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Piaget>

Jean Piaget writes that within logic, juxtaposition is a logical fallacy
on the part of the observer, where two items placed next to each other
imply a correlation, when none is actually claimed. For example, an
illustration of a politician and Adolf Hitler on the same page would
imply that the politician had a common ideology with Hitler. Similarly,
saying "Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are
you" would have the same effect.

This particular rhetorical device is common enough to have its own name,
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM*.

THE FUEHRER EXPRESSED HIMSELF AS FOLLOWS:

A child {

YOUTUBE: "Children [Robert Miles d. (9 May 2017)]"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-fZ1PQJrZc>

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #325 as #50, #5, #70, #200 = neos (G3501): {#18 as #325}
1) recently born, *YOUNG*, youthful; 2) new;

}, for example, who in its very early years has been frightened {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #30, #200, #1 = yare' (H3372): {#17 as #231} 1)
*TO* *FEAR*, *REVERE*, *BE* *AFRAID*; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3)
to fear, reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) *TO* *BE*
*FEARFUL*, *BE* DREADFUL*, *BE* *FEARED*; 1b2) to cause astonishment and
awe, be held in awe; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c)
(Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;

} with the threat {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #20, #4, #2, #200, #5 = dabar (H1696): {#3 as
#231} 1) to speak, declare, converse, command, promise, warn,
*THREATEN*, sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one
another, talk; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to
be spoken; 1e) (Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to
flight;

} of the bogey-man in the dark, will frequently retain {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513):
{#34 as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *WITHHOLD*; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;

} throughout all the years of its development a fear of entering a dark
room, a cellar or the like; among women a fear of this nature inculcated
in early youth {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49
as #231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*

} often persists for a lifetime. On the other hand, there are dangers
which, not ever having come to his notice {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231}
1) to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act
or treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to
be recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard,
observe, pay attention to, pay regard to, *NOTICE*; 1c2) to recognise
(as formerly known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or
acknowledge, acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5)
to distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
(Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
(profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
2c2) to disguise oneself;

}, a man {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49
as #231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*

} completely ignores. A child living in an area exposed to bombing and
to whom the dangers of a bombardment {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #8, #200, #10, #2, #6 = charab (H2717): {#20
as #231} 1) *TO* *BE* *WASTE*, *LAY* *WASTE*, *MAKE* *DESOLATE*, *BE*
*DESOLATE*, *BE* *IN* *RUINS*; 2) to be dry, be dried up; 3) *TO*
*ATTACK*, *SMITE* *DOWN*, *SLAY*, *FIGHT*; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be
desolate; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made desolate; 1b2) desolate
(participle); 1c) (Hiphil) to lay waste, make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to
be laid waste; 2a) (Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b) (Pual) to be
dried; 2c) (Hiphil) to dry up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried up;

} have not been explained, will regard an enemy air attack as a noisy
firework display, and will not as a rule show the slightest sign of
fear." [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK (1941-1944), IDEA @233 / PAGE #514]

APPRAISAL 2: He casts the sacred milfoil.
He fires the turtle’s shell.
Leaving the muck, he enters the anointed.
FATHOMING 2: Casting milfoil, firing the turtle,
Means: He approaches the path of glory.

As Confucius tells us, the better part of wisdom is to recognize what
you do not know. For that reason, the youth in search of greater
understanding uses divination procedures to resolve cases of grave
doubt. (Their sacred character precludes casual use.) Divination by
milfoil (also called yarrow) and by turtle are the two ancient forms of
prognostication hallowed by Chinese tradition. Significantly, each of
these instruments for communication with the divine represents
accumulated age and experience: the graph for milfoil contains the
character for 'old' within it, while the marvellous capacities of the
turtle are attributed to its fabled longevity. By implication, if the
ancients are consulted in every doubtful case, a miracle will take
place: the individual will emerge from obscurity and muddleheadedness
(the “muck”) to gain enlightenment and honour (an “anointment”).

APPRAISAL 3: The Eastern Star already shines,
Yet he cannot proceed by its light.
FATHOMING 3: The Eastern Star already shining
Means: Why not go?

Appraisal 3 marks the transition from Thought to Action. The necessary
preconditions for enlightenment are present since the Eastern Star
already shines. In other words, good teachers are available, the
classics have been promulgated, and all the various tools of
civilisation (including divination) have been provided. For some reason,
the individual fails to take advantage of the opportunities for *MORAL*
*GROWTH*, assuming himself to be incapable of maturity {ie. MEMBRUM
VIRILE meaning manly, masculine, mature}. In reality, he lacks
sufficient will to follow in the Way. The Analects condemns those who
'hear of duty, yet do not move toward it.'

APPRAISAL 4: Some follow those in front.
Those ahead light their way.
FATHOMING 4: Following the ones in front
Means: Great is the light of those who lead.

In contrast to Appraisal 3, Appraisal 4 praises individuals who take
full advantage of the illumination provided by *MORAL* *EXEMPLARS* of
the past. Given the penetrating power of those exemplars, even those who
follow at some distance in time and space can find their Way by the
light. This contention implicitly refutes Chuang tzu’s belief that the
Classics represent only the 'dregs' of the former sages’ teachings. [END
OF QUOTE]

THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY ON TETRA: 15 - REACH {CORRELATES WITH WITH
HEAVEN'S; YANG; THE PHASE WATER; AND THE I CHING HEXAGRAM H11 - GREATNESS}

HEAD: Yang ch’i emerges, limb to branch to twig. There is nothing that
does not reach its full extension.

The language used in this Head text is particularly beautiful. The
luxuriant growth of trees suggests the burgeoning presence of yang ch’i.
With its energy reaching out to ever smaller units, the web of yang’s
influence grows increasingly comprehensive until each aspect of the
cosmos is profoundly affected. This impulse towards progressive
differentiation is analogous to the mind’s ability to make ever finer
distinctions, so that the tetragram Reach symbolizes mental
“perceptiveness” that “comprehends” as well, which are two other
possible translations for the title. In a third application of Reach,
the gracious condescension that yang ch’i displays towards phenomenal
existence becomes the model for the good ruler in his dealings with the
masses. These three kinds of reaching (physical, mental, and political)
are treated below, with many of the Appraisals reading on all three
levels simultaneously. Finally, one of the commentators interprets the
tetragram title as Success, following standard usage in the Odes. The
greater one’s acuity and contacts, the more likely conventional types of
success are to come within one’s reach.

APPRAISAL 1: Though hidden, the center, on its own
Comprehends, pushing through, undeterred.
FATHOMING 1: That the hidden center alone reaches
Means: Inner clarity is boundless.

The innermost heart/mind of the superior man with its heightened powers
of comprehension penetrates each problem in turn until it assimilates
the daemonic powers of Heaven-and-Earth and the sages. If such
marvellous powers are to be realized, great persistence is needed, as
indicated by the repetition of images emphasising the “push through.”
That process is hidden not only because of the depth of the individual’s
soul, but also because the mind’s latent power is held in reserve prior
to the decision to take action, which is addressed in later Appraisals.

APPRAISAL 2: Misleading the belly
Affects the eye.
FATHOMING 2: That the belly’s delusions reach the eye
Means: It makes the Way unclear.

The theme is the interdependence of inner and outer. As in many early
Chinese texts, the belly (the internal organ which stands for sensory
desire and “gut” reactions) is contrasted with the outer eye (the
discriminating mind that makes contact with the outer world). If the
belly is confused, the eye cannot hope to evaluate various courses of
action properly. For this reason, the individual will confuse the Way.
As one Chinese master cautions, “*DO* *NOT* *LET* *THE* *SENSES*
*CONFUSE* *THE* *MIND*.”

"Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and
worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not
seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, and not holding the Head,
from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment
ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God.

Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the RUDIMENTS {

STOICHEION: something orderly in arrangement, that is, (by implication)
a serial (basal, fundamental, initial) constituent (literally),
proposition (figuratively):—element, principle, rudiment

} OF THE WORLD {

KOSMOS: orderly arrangement, that is, decoration; by implication the
world (in a wide or narrow sense, including its inhabitants, literally
or figuratively [morally]):—adorning, world

}, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,
(*TOUCH* *NOT*; *TASTE* *NOT*; *HANDLE* *NOT*; Which all are to perish
with the using) after the commandments and doctrines of men?

Which things have indeed a *SHOW* *OF* *WISDOM* *IN* *WILL* *WORSHIP*,
and humility, and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the
satisfying of the flesh." [Colossians 2:18-23 (KJV)]

APPRAISAL 3: Only by sweeping down can the green wood’s
Excellence reach melons and gourds.
FATHOMING 3: Only by its condescension
Means: Reciprocity within becomes the measure.

Gracious condescension is suggested in terms reminiscent of the Head
text. To the Chinese reader, the downward sweep of verdant branches in
spring inevitably recalls the flowing robes of the sage-kings of old.
The great tree offers support and protection to lesser living things,
just like the sage-king; here it allows the lowly but useful melons and
gourds to wind their vines around its majestic form. Similarly, the man
of great virtue does not avoid all contact with lesser individuals.
Instead, he fosters others’ development by a sympathetic understanding
of their essential needs and natures. As a result, the lives of his
subordinates are made secure. Consideration for others, in short,
becomes the true measure of nobility.

APPRAISAL 4: Petty wit has little reach.
Greatly misled by the narrow and small,
He never will be saved.
FATHOMING 4: Keen in small things, confused in great
Means: He only knows one corner of the problem.

As teacher, Confucius looked for one attribute in his disciples: the
ability, “given one corner of a problem,” to correctly surmise the other
three. As Confucius argues, a gentleman is defined by the comprehensive
nature of his view. The sage, then, is “all-seeing.” A smattering of
knowledge often leads to complacency, which in turn provokes disaster.2
For this reason, many passages in the early Chinese classics inveigh
against petty one-sidedness. As Appraisal 4 corresponds to lower rank,
YANG HSIUNG discusses the typical failures of minor bureaucrats. The
great / small contrast is also found in the correspondent Changes hexagram.

APPRAISAL 5: Having reached the Central Crossroad,
Neither small nor great misleads him.

FATHOMING 5: Reaching the place where all paths converge
Means: The way is open in all four directions.

Appraisal 5 is said to rule the tetragram as center. The lines are
correlated with yang ch’i in a yang tetragram; hence, their auspicious
character. The pursuit of Goodness is like a journey down a path. Once
the individual fully assimilates the idea of the Mean, all roads lie
open to him; regardless of which course is chosen, every action is
consistent with morality. In the case of the temporal ruler, every move
meets with immediate success. This imagery offers a direct contrast to
that of Tetragram H31, Appraisal 6.

APPRAISAL 6: A great reach has no bounds,
It does not stop at center?
Barriers create obstacles.
FATHOMING 6: A great reach, without bounds,
Means: It should not continue on one side only.

Any reading of these lines depends upon the moral weight given the first
phrase in the Appraisal and Fathoming: “great reach without bounds.” Is
this a description of morality or immorality? Early evidence may be
cited to support either view. One commentator argues:

The Great Way ought to reach every single place. It is not right to stop
it in mid-course. If someone builds raised earth embankments [ie.
barriers between fields], that is to create a place where something does
not get through, to create an obstruction.

It is true that unimpeded reach is the quality attributed to the
superior man in Han texts. Nevertheless, certain commentators, including
Ssu-ma Kuang, are not entirely unjustified in equating the phrase “no
bounds” with “dangerous license.” In that case, the poem says:

A GREAT REACH WITHOUT BOUNDS,

[IF] NOT STOPPED AT CENTER AND REGULATED BY DITCHES,
IS EVIL.

A GREAT REACH WITHOUT BOUNDS
MEANS: NOT RIGHT TO LET IT CONTINUE ON ALL SIDES.

In the rice fields, embankments are necessary if the fields are to be
worked productively. In the human realm, the institutionalization of
various restraints {ie.

*MODERNUS* as the organization of the myriad ‘Things or institutions of
the present' is the practiced consideration of moderation {ie. modo:
(just now’) originally ablative of modus: (‘measure’)} within the
permissibility of boundaries

} is needed for the beneficial functioning of society. Otherwise, an
unimpeded flow of emotions and ambitions will prove no less damaging to
society than floodwaters are to new crops. The implied cultivation of
the fields also suggests the *CULTIVATION* *OF* *THE* *MIND*, which
depends upon the *ACCEPTANCE* *OF* *A* *SET* *OF* *LIMITS* *EMBODIED*
*IN* *RITUAL*. Without such constraints, the mind ranges so freely that
its undeveloped powers will fail to hit upon significant pattern in the
triadic realms of Heaven-Earth-Man. When the worthy man restrains
himself and others, he follows the example of the early sage-king and
flood-queller YU, the first to set up boundaries.

APPRAISAL 7: Reached by the flint probe’s cut:
With early loss comes later gain.
FATHOMING 7: The scalpel reaching the affected spot
Means: By this means, in the end, he is not disabled.

Early Chinese texts frequently compare the strictures of early training
to unpleasant medicine or painful surgery forced upon the patient by the
conscientious doctor. As the proverb says, “Good medicine is bitter to
the tongue.” Similarly, the harsh necessity of the penal code is likened
to the flint probe employed in acupuncture. Early correction, however
traumatic, results in future benefit. Once the old, diseased area is cut
away, there is a chance for new healthy growth to take its place.

APPRAISAL 8: Misleading the eye
Affects the belly.
FATHOMING 8: That the eye’s delusions reach the belly
Means: The outer deceives the inner.

Following Appraisal 2 above, this verse reiterates the interdependence
of mind and body, inner and outer. If the eye as the mind’s receptor for
outward impressions becomes confused for any reason, the resulting
mistakes, sooner or later, are bound to affect the innermost self. For
example, a half-starved man may reach for chalk to eat, rather than
rice, or a well-dressed man may think himself a gentleman. Such outer
mistakes inevitably cause physical and moral damage to the inner self.

APPRAISAL 9: Perceiving his blame, he rights himself
And in the end, he wins renown.
FATHOMING 9: Comprehending blame, final renown,
Means: He's good at using the Way to retreat.

Though Appraisal 9 represents the final stage of calamity, here it is
aligned with auspicious Day (see Table 2, page 00). The superior
individual, recognizing the justice of society’s complaints about his
conduct, amends his ways and retreats from evil, thereby securing a good
name for himself. [The Canon of Supreme Mystery (4 BCE) by Yang Hsiung
(53 BCE-18 CE), A translation with Commentary of the T'AI HSUAN CHING by
Michael Nylan 1993]

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #128 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;

THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.

#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115

H4046@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 60 (#80); Ego: 40 (#60),
@3: Sup: 63 (#143); Ego: 3 (#63),
@4: Sup: 62 (#205); Ego: 80 (#143),
@5: Sup: 67 (#272); Ego: 5 (#148),
Male: #272; Feme: #148
} // #148

#148 as [#20, #40, #3, #80, #5] = maggephah (H4046): {#15 as #128 % #41
= #5} 1) blow, *SLAUGHTER*, plague, pestilence, strike, smite; 1a) blow
(fatal stroke); 1b) *SLAUGHTER* (*OF* *BATTLE*); 1c) plague,
*PESTILENCE* (*DIVINE* *JUDGMENT*)

H1100@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
@3: Sup: 38 (#52); Ego: 30 (#38),
@4: Sup: 48 (#100); Ego: 10 (#48),
@5: Sup: 37 (#137); Ego: 70 (#118),
@6: Sup: 67 (#204); Ego: 30 (#148),
Male: #204; Feme: #148
} // #148

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180

#148 as [#6, #2, #30, #10, #70, #30] = beliya`al (H1100): {#0 as #142 %
#41 = #19} 1) worthlessness; 1a) worthless, good for nothing,
unprofitable, base fellow; 1b) wicked; 1c) ruin, destruction (construct);

INSERT FURTHER REFERENCES FROM THE ELEMENTAL CHANGES OF 4 BCE / 2 BCE HERE

"BECAUSE THOU HAST SPOILED MANY NATIONS, ALL THE REMNANT OF THE PEOPLE
SHALL SPOIL THEE; BECAUSE OF MEN’S BLOOD, AND FOR THE VIOLENCE OF THE
LAND, OF THE CITY, AND OF ALL THAT DWELL THEREIN:

HOMOIOS PROTOTYPE: (#3 as #128 / #384)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 59 (#100); Ego: 18 (#59),
@3: Sup: 47 (#147); Ego: 69 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#181); Ego: 68 (#196),
@5: Sup: 74 (#255); Ego: 40 (#236), <-- *PAIRING*
@6: Sup: 13 (#268); Ego: 20 (#256),
@7: Sup: 32 (#300); Ego: 19 (#275),
@8: Sup: 21 (#321); Ego: 70 (#345), <-- #391 as [#70, #10, #20,
#70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia (G3622): {#11 as #341 %
#41 = #13} 1) the management of a household or of household affairs; 1a)
specifically, the management, oversight, administration, of other's
property; 1b) the office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c)
administration, dispensation

@9: Sup: 60 (#381); Ego: 39 (#384),
Male: #381; Feme: #384
} // #384

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#3 as #96 / #288)@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 15 (#22); Ego: 8 (#15),
@3: Sup: 24 (#46); Ego: 9 (#24),
@4: Sup: 55 (#101); Ego: 31 (#55),
@5: Sup: 6 (#107); Ego: 32 (#87),
@6: Sup: 39 (#146); Ego: 33 (#120), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN*
*ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT:
#120 / #360
@7: Sup: 13 (#159); Ego: 55 (#175), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN*
*ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #ONE: #99
/ #297

@8: Sup: 69 (#228); Ego: 56 (#231 - SHARED JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL OF
EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE),
@9: Sup: 45 (#273); Ego: 57 (#288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11
SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)),
Male: #273; Feme: #288
} // 288

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE} <-- *AS* *THE* *FOUNDATION* *STONE*
(*USURPING* @1 = *SOVEREIGN* / #CENTRE @5 = *LAST* *WILL*, *TESTAMENT*
*OF* #INR *BEING* *THE* *BINDING* *NORM* (*NORMA* *OBLIGANS* ) *ON* #33
AD) *MAGIC* *SQUARE

#1 (9) - OUHOUYAH (King-Seraphim) = #1
#9 (8) - HAZIEL (King-Cherubim) = #10
#17 (7) - LEVYAH (King-Throne) = #27 <-- SOVEREIGNTY / PYTHAGOREAN
TERNIO ANAGRAM TO #INR
#25 (6) - NETEHYAH (King-Dominion) = #52 <-- *THEY* *ARE* *AS* *THE*
*SONS* *OF* *DARKNESS* *NOT* *THE* *SONS* *OF* *LIGHT* / *GOD* *AS* #123

#33 (5) - YHOUYAH (King-Powers) = #85 <-- ADAMANT {ie. fixed mind /
dogmatic} / DIAMOND 💍
#41 (4) - HEHAHEL (King-Virtues) = #126
#49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175 <-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 /
#175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN* *ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*
#57 (2) - NEMAMYAH (King-Archangels) = #232
#65 - *SOLDIER* (1) - DAMBYAN (King-Angels) = #29

“WHO HATH DELIVERED US FROM THE POWER OF DARKNESS {ie. #351 - BELIEL as
SEPTET MACROCOSM *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #SEVEN: #117 / #351 AND TORAH
PROTOTYPE #SEVEN: #132 / #396}, AND HATH TRANSLATED US INTO THE KINGDOM
OF HIS DEAR SON:

IN WHOM WE HAVE REDEMPTION THROUGH HIS BLOOD, EVEN THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS:

WHO IS THE IMAGE OF THE INVISIBLE GOD, THE FIRSTBORN OF EVERY CREATURE:

FOR BY HIM WERE ALL THINGS CREATED, THAT ARE IN *HEAVEN*, AND THAT ARE
IN *EARTH*, VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE, WHETHER [THEY BE]

*THRONES* {#27 - SOVEREIGNTY}, or

*DOMINIONS* {#52 as 6J = 6x49 = 294 x 364 {ie. #7 x #52} days of years =
107,016 / 293 = 365.24232}, or

*PRINCIPALITIES* {#175 - MARRIAGE as anthropic prototype}, or

*POWERS* {#85 = #10, #5, #30, #40 = A precious stone; diamond or *ADAMANT*

[Noun]: a legendary rock or mineral to which many properties were
attributed, formerly associated with diamond or lodestone;
[Adjective]: refusing to be persuaded or to change one's mind;
[Origin]: Old English (as a noun), from Old French adamaunt-, via Latin
from Greek adamas, adamant-, ‘untameable, invincible’ (later used to
denote the hardest metal or stone, hence diamond), from a- ‘not’ + daman
‘to tame’. The phrase to be adamant dates from the 1930s, although
adjectival use had been implied in such collocations as ‘an adamant
heart’ since the 16th century.

YOUTUBE: “Kylie Minogue - Diamonds Are A Girl's Best Friend (Fox Studios
Grand Opening)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03dCwHcf-pw>

}: ALL THINGS WERE CREATED BY HIM, AND FOR HIM:

AND HE IS BEFORE ALL THINGS, AND BY HIM ALL THINGS CONSIST.

AND HE IS THE HEAD OF THE BODY, THE CHURCH: WHO IS THE BEGINNING {

ARCHĒ: a commencement, or (concrete) chief (in various applications of
order, time, place or rank):—beginning, corner, (at the, the) first
(estate), magistrate, power, principality, principle, rule

}, THE FIRSTBORN FROM THE DEAD; THAT IN ALL THINGS HE MIGHT HAVE THE
PREEMINENCE." [Colossians 1:13-18 (KJV)]

"WOE TO HIM THAT COVETETH AN EVIL COVETOUSNESS TO HIS HOUSE, THAT HE MAY
SET HIS NEST ON HIGH, THAT HE MAY BE DELIVERED FROM THE POWER OF EVIL!

THOU HAST CONSULTED SHAME TO THY HOUSE BY CUTTING OFF MANY PEOPLE, AND
HAST SINNED AGAINST THY SOUL." [Habakkuk 2:8-10 (KJV)]

It's interpretation concerns the last priests of Jerusalem, who will
accumulate riches and loot from plundering the nations. However, in the
last days their riches and their loot will be given into the hands of
the army of the KITTIM {ie. Romans}. For they are [v 2:8a] 'rest of the
nations.' [v 2:8b] For the human blood (spilt) and violence (done) to
the country, the city and all who dwell in it. [Dead Sea Scrolls 1QpHAB
IX:4-9, circa 104-43 BCE]

In whatever circumstance, it is capable of being hosted upon the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS as it's mechanism for delivery and
staging which then becomes an acute and risky precipice consideration
that is accorded entirely by my Intellectual Property and thusly my
reasonable objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY
imposing {#17 / #33 - #INR / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS
ethic upon our {#390 / #288 / #419} war dead and usurping the @1 -
SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 - HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth's Governance
which is defined as a PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37}
by Queen Victoria's Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the
instrumentation of Federation into a nation.

@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INR
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776

#390 as [#5, #90, #80, #10, #200, #5] = tsephiyrah (H6843): {#8 as #385
% #41 = #16} 1) plait, chaplet, *WREATH*, *CROWN*; 1a) plait, coronet,
*DIADEM*;

"But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the
passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews
{#INR}?

Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas {son of
shame, confusion as Babylon / Babel, incongruity; confusion; mixture as
A-U-M: #15 CE ... #34 CE ... #65 CE ... #111 CE ... #175 CE ... #260 CE
(64 meta descriptor prototypes) ... #369 CE (encapsulated use of those
prototypes to define #81 elements) as opposite to congruity and
ratiocination}. Now Barabbas was a robber {cf: #390 - ROBBERS / SAINT
ANDREWS DAY of 30 NOVEMBER: <http://www.grapple369.com?date:2017.11.30>
}." [John 18:31-40 (KJV)]

G724@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
@3: Sup: 19 (#40); Ego: 80 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#60); Ego: 1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 23 (#83); Ego: 3 (#104),
@6: Sup: 31 (#114); Ego: 8 (#112),
@7: Sup: 69 (#183); Ego: 38 (#150),
Male: #183; Feme: #150
} // #393

<-- LATER INCLUSION OF 21 APRIL 2018 WHICH CONFIRMS MY INTUITION OF 31
JULY 2017

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #193 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

#393 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #8, #200] = harpage (G724): {#7 as #193
% #41 = #29} 1) the act of plundering, robbery; 2) plunder spoil; 3)
pillage (properly abstract):--extortion; 4) ravening: (of a ferocious
wild animal) extremely hungry and hunting for prey; 5) spoiling

#334 as [#20, #300, #4, #10] = Chaldeans; Chaldea; astrologers; magician
{ie. *AS* *DEMONS*, *OR* *AS* *ROBBERS*;

#5 as #PHALLUS = #360 / #72 or #365 / #73 = #5 + 5x5 = #25 / #65 /
Usurper: @1 / Mystery: #26 {*YHWH*} / Leader: #325 / Regulator: #390 /
General Governor: #780 / 2 = #390 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200]
as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) *A*
*EXTORTIONER*, *A* *ROBBER* or #365 / #5 = #73}

@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity

@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40
- Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]
as EXISTENCE.

Which as DATA SET knowledge provided by the HEBREW / GREEK Biblical
lexicon being the CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING as coming into my
possession as expressed by a time stamped @ 2019 HOURS ON 28 JULY 2011,
then had a confirmation to its existence within my possession only upon
19 MAY 2016 in having at such prior time been DATA MINED by my own
undertaking and ingenuity in being sourced from a *FOREIGN* *AGENT*
named RICHARD AMIEL MCGOUGH, whom is well educated within mathematics
and quantum physics and currently a software engineer at 4QTRS within
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and this occurred following
his debunked BIBLE WHEEL PROJECT (2001-2011) as research MATERIAL which
accompanied a selective computed #288 - UMBRA by contrived GEMATRIA
value being a DATA MANIPULATION that whilst initially obscured by
myself, regardlessly conveyed a clear MENS REA {ie. the intention or
knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to
the action or conduct of the accused} of defeasance (French: défaire, to
undo) which within law, is an instrument which defeats the force or
operation of some other deed or estate; as distinguished from condition,
that which in the same deed is called a condition is a defeasance in
another deed. Thusly irrefutably sustains the gravitas of my claim as
to there being tangibility by ACTUS REUS {ie. action or conduct which is
a constituent element of a crime, as opposed to the mental state of the
accused} and therefore reasonable concerns for my safety, wellbeing and
security.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #nnn % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;

THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; *I* *AM* *NOT* *OF* *AGGRESSIVE* *HAND*.

#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #SIX: #114 / #342 AND TORAH
PROTOTYPES #FIVE: #114 / #342 AND #SIX: #123 / #369

#209 as [#50, #70, #9, #70, #10] = nothos (G3541): {UMBRA: #17 as #399 %
#41 = #30} 1) illegitimate, bastard; 2) one born, not in lawful wedlock,
but of a concubine or female slave;

ITS INTERPRETATION CONCERNS THE WICKED PRIEST {ie. #POSITION as OPINION:
#5 + #6 = #11 as Collegium of Pontiffs from 510 BCE as AS PONTIFICATED
DEIFIED IGNORANCE BEING NARCISSISM:

HOMOIOS PROTOTYPE: (#5 as #15 / #45)@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 11 (#19); Ego: 3 (#11),
@3: Sup: 17 (#36); Ego: 6 (#17),
@4: Sup: 22 (#58); Ego: 5 (#22),
@5: Sup: 23 (#81); Ego: 1 (#23),
@6: Sup: 32 (#113); Ego: 9 (#32),
@7: Sup: 34 (#147); Ego: 2 (#34),
@8: Sup: 41 (#188); Ego: 7 (#41),
@9: Sup: 45 (#233); Ego: 4 (#45),
Male: #233; Feme: #45
} // 45 <-- *ADAM*

H120@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 41 (#81); Ego: 1 (#41),
@3: Sup: 45 (#126); Ego: 4 (#45 % #41 = #4),
@4: Sup: 78 (#204); Ego: 33 (#78),
Male: #204; Feme: #78
} // #85

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #86 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;

THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
at Elephantine; *I* *AM* *NOT* *RAPACIOUS*.

#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102

#45 as [#40, #1, #4, #600] = 'adam (H120): {#1 as #85 % #41 = #3} 1)
man, mankind; 1a) man, human being; 1b) man, mankind (much more
frequently intended sense in OT); 1c) Adam, first man; 1d) city in
Jordan valley

JEWISH TORAH AGAINST THE NAME OF YHWH: Ou'RaEL = Vav (#6) + Resh (#200)
+ Aleph (#1) + Lamed (#30) being an impost on the name of GOD ALMIGHTY:

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#5 as #114 / #342)@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 27 (#40); Ego: 14 (#27),
@3: Sup: 42 (#82); Ego: 15 (#42),
@4: Sup: 79 (#161); Ego: 37 (#79),
@5: Sup: 36 (#197); Ego: 38 (#117),
@6: Sup: 75 (#272); Ego: 39 (#156),
@7: Sup: 55 (#327); Ego: 61 (#217),
@8: Sup: 36 (#363); Ego: 62 (#279),
@9: Sup: 18 (#381); Ego: 63 (#342),
Male: #381; Feme: #342
} // 342 as Vav (#6) + Tsade (#90) + Gimel (#3) + Yod (#10) + He (#5) /
#342 as AIR (-)

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#5 as #111 / #333)@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 18 (#23); Ego: 13 (#18),
@3: Sup: 39 (#62); Ego: 21 (#39),
@4: Sup: 68 (#130); Ego: 29 (#68),

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #42 - Generating Things, Reason's Modifications; I-Ching: H60 -
Control, Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation; Tetra: 52 -
Measure

THOTH MEASURE: #42 - Oh thou who liftest an arm, (30) and who makest
thine appearance in the Netherworld, *I* *DO* *NOT* *THAT* *WHICH*
*OFFENDETH* *THE* *GOD* *OF* *MY* *DOMAIN*.

#VIRTUE: The noble man fosters good luck.
#TOOLS: That means the petty man fosters ill.
#POSITION: With Increase (no. 13), to have gains, but
#TIME: With Diminishment (no. 55), to have losses.
#CANON: #68

@5: Sup: 24 (#154); Ego: 37 (#105),
@6: Sup: 69 (#223); Ego: 45 (#150),

UMBRA: #nnn % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, (22) who makest thy
appearance at even; I indulge not in anger.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

@7: Sup: 41 (#264); Ego: 53 (#203),
@8: Sup: 21 (#285); Ego: 61 (#264),
@9: Sup: 9 (#294); Ego: 69 (#333),
Male: #294; Feme: #333 <-- 7 DAYS X 24 PRIESTLY DIVISIONS X 13 X 49
= 6J AS 294 YEARS X 364 DAYS
} // #333

1. THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses*
*of* *priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364
associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30
day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days

"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]

2. THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
#294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

AS BEING A LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY

"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]

3. THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/MAN/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369
with Septet #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1
Tishri 5762.

AS BEING A SUBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF INFINITY AS ETERNITY

"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]

HOMOIOS PROTOTYPE: (#6 as #391)@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 6 (#36); Ego: 57 (#87),
@3: Sup: 38 (#74); Ego: 32 (#119),
@4: Sup: 16 (#90); Ego: 59 (#178),
@5: Sup: 47 (#137); Ego: 31 (#209),
@6: Sup: 21 (#158); Ego: 55 (#264),
@7: Sup: 77 (#235); Ego: 56 (#320),
@8: Sup: 9 (#244); Ego: 13 (#333),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311); Ego: 58 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // #391

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#6 as #114 / #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272), <-- #391 as [#70, #10, #20,
#70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia (G3622): {#11 as #341 %
#41 = #13} 1) the management of a household or of household affairs; 1a)
specifically, the management, oversight, administration, of other's
property; 1b) the office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c)
administration, dispensation

@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#6 as #123 / #369)@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 33 (#49); Ego: 17 (#33),
@3: Sup: 51 (#100); Ego: 18 (#51),
@4: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 40 (#91),
@5: Sup: 51 (#161); Ego: 41 (#132),
@6: Sup: 12 (#173); Ego: 42 (#174),
@7: Sup: 76 (#249); Ego: 64 (#238),
@8: Sup: 60 (#309); Ego: 65 (#303),
@9: Sup: 45 (#354); Ego: 66 (#369),
Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369

}, WHOM, FOR THE WICKEDNESS AGAINST THE TEACHER OF RIGHTEOUSNESS AND THE
MEMBERS OF HIS COUNCIL, GOD DELIVERED INTO THE HANDS OF HIS ENEMIES TO
DISGRACE HIM WITH A PUNISHMENT, TO DESTROY HIM WITH BITTERNESS OF SOUL
FOR HAVING ACTED WICKEDLY AGAINST HIS ELECT {ie. #509 - YAHAD} [v 2:9]
WOE TO ANYONE PUTTING ILL-GOTTEN GAINS IN HIS #391 - HOUSE {

G3622@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288); Ego: 40 (#330),
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321); Ego: 1 (#341),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) the management of a household or
of household affairs; 1a) specifically, the management, oversight,
administration, of other's property; 1b) the office of a manager or
overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
#41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b)
like: ie. corresponding to a thing;

}, PLACING HIS PERCH HIGH UP TO ESCAPE THE POWER OF EVIL! YOU HAVE
PLANNED THINGS THAT WILL BRING DISGRACE TO YOUR #391 - HOUSE, DESTROYING
MANY NATIONS AND SINNING AGAINST YOUR #369 - SOUL." [Dead Sea Scrolls
1QpHAB IX:11-14]

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence.

Syncretism of cognitions can only occur when there is referential
integrity relating to the nature of references or any allusions. And
for this realisation one must have recourse to at least a rudimentary
understanding of the meta-descriptor prototypes as being implicit within
the notion of any metacognition which is "cognition about cognition",
"thinking about thinking", "knowing about knowing", becoming "aware of
one's awareness" and higher-order thinking skills. The term comes from
the root word meta, meaning "beyond".

The term metacognition literally means cognition about cognition, or
more informally, thinking about thinking. Flavell defined metacognition
as knowledge about cognition and control of cognition. For example, a
person is engaging in metacognition if he notices that he is having more
trouble learning A than B, or if it strikes her that she should
double-check C before accepting it as fact. [J. H. Flavell (1976, p. 232)]

John Scotus Eriugena, or Johannes Scotus Erigena (c. 815 – c. 877) was
an Irish theologian, neoplatonist philosopher, and poet. He wrote a
number of works, but is best known today for having written The Division
of Nature, which has been called the final achievement of ancient
philosophy, a work which "synthesizes the philosophical accomplishments
of fifteen centuries."

The Latin title De divisione naturae (Περί φύσεων) refers to these four
divisions of nature:

(1) that which creates and is not created;

+ 0, H27, H54 {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL
LAW}

(2) that which is created and creates;

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. SYSTEM'S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH - FORMULA OF HUMANITY}

(3) that which is created and does not create;

+ 0, H3, H6 {ie. SEA AS SELF IDENTITY - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY}

(4) that which is neither created nor creates.

+ H1, H2, H3 {ie. FOUNTAINS OF WATERS AS FORMULA OF PROGRESSION TO
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA (WAN WU)}

The first is God as the ground or origin of all things, the last is God
as the final end or goal of all things, that into which the world of
created things ultimately returns.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. AS ACT OF NATURE THE ORGANIZATION OF THE
MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}

The second and third together compose the created universe, which is the
manifestation of God, God in process, Theophania; the second is the
world of Platonic ideas or forms:

H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE OF BEING IS A TRANSCENDENT PRINCIPLE
OF A MATHEMATICAL LOGICAL AND CERTAINTY AS HAVING AN INESCAPABLE
CONSEQUENCE;

And the third is a more pantheistic world, or a pandeistic one,
depending on the interference of God.

Eriugena argued on behalf of something like a pantheistic definition of
nature. He translated and made commentaries upon the work of
Pseudo-Dionysius, and was one of the few Western European philosophers
of his day that knew Greek, having studied in Athens.

H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU WHICH GIVES RISE TO {ie.
ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND
NATURE}

And Eriugena explains that reason is necessary to understand and
interpret revelation. Authority is the source of knowledge, but the
reason of mankind is the *DIALECTIC* norm by which all authority is judged:

#4 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {RESTATEMENT OF A SACRED / SOVEREIGN
PRINCIPLE AS INSTANCE OF: 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 / #41 = #9 AS @4 - #VIRTUE}:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

+ H1 - *ZEN*, H2 - *ROW*, H3 - *COL* {ie. FOUNTAINS OF WATERS AS FORMULA
OF PROGRESSION TO INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA (WAN WU)}

Is entirely a logical proposition of relativity to a progression of the
*EGO* and *SELF* *AUTONOMY* which is defined by the universal norm of
the _GIZMO {} array as INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS.

Within our example of EVENT 71582072@{} this is the initial NOUS stem:

@1: Sup: 47 (#47); Ego: 47 (#47)

As the meta-descriptor prototype: #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the
Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution, Displacement, Parting,
Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution

#3 - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY {ASSUMPTIVE PROPOSITION AS @3 - #TOOLS}:

These then follow the norm which is the DIALECTIC applied to the
trinomial definition of #NUMBER itself and thusly defines the second (or
by reverse notation) in terms of:

@2: Sup: 79 (#126); Ego: 32 (#79):

+ 0, H3 - #32, H6 - #79 {ie. SEA AS SELF IDENTITY - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY}

As the meta-descriptor prototypes: #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of
Holiness; I-Ching: H44 - Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet,
Meeting; Tetra: 43 - Encounters

#79 - Recognizing Agreements, Keeping Obligations; I-Ching: H56 - The
Wanderer, Sojourning, Traveling; Tetra: 31 - Packing

Which conveys from the TAXIS of those meta-descriptor prototypes as
“thinking about thinking” some sort of conception as a troubling lack of
discernment
about encountering a *MORAL* deficiency:

#126 as [#70, #6, #700] = `avon (H5771): {UMBRA: #3 as #126 % #41 = #3}
1) perversity, depravity, iniquity, guilt or punishment of iniquity; 1a)
iniquity; 1b) guilt of iniquity, guilt (as great), guilt (of condition);
1c) consequence of or punishment for iniquity;

#2 - FORMULA OF HUMANITY {MINOR PREMISE AS @2 - #POSITION}:

+ 0, H9 - @3: Ego: n (#n), H18 - @3: Sup: n (#n) {ie. SYSTEM'S COSMOLOGY
AS EARTH - FORMULA OF HUMANITY}

@3: Sup: n (#n); Ego: n (#n):

#1 - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW (MAJOR PREMISE: TEMPORALITY AS @1 - #TIME):

+ 0, H27 - @4: Ego: n (#n), H54 - @4: Sup: n (#n) {ie. REALM OF ITS
NATURE AS HEAVEN - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW} #5 - DISCRIMINATING NORM
{PAIRING} AS CANONICAL IMPERATIVE

And thusly in consideration of *PERJURY* as DISCERNMENT of any
intentional act of either swearing a false oath or falsifying an
affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning
matters a generation material to an official proceeding.

H5949@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 19 (#89); Ego: 30 (#100),
@3: Sup: 29 (#118); Ego: 10 (#110),
@4: Sup: 59 (#177); Ego: 30 (#140),
@5: Sup: 65 (#242); Ego: 6 (#146),
@6: Sup: 60 (#302); Ego: 76 (#222),
@7: Sup: 12 (#314); Ego: 33 (#255),
Male: #314; Feme: #255 <-- *LITMUS* *TEST* *FOR* *PERJURY* UNDER
SECTION #314 TO CRIMES ACT OF VICTORIA 1958
} // #586

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
Tetra: 25 - Contention;

THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.

#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148

#586 as [#70, #30, #10, #30, #6, #400, #600] = `aliylah (H5949): {UMBRA:
#35 as #586 % #41 = #12} 1) wantonness, deed, doing; 1a) wantonness; 1b)
deed; 1c) *PRACTICES*, *EVIL* *DEEDS*

G4137@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 29 (#109); Ego: 30 (#110),
@3: Sup: 37 (#146); Ego: 8 (#118),
@4: Sup: 56 (#202); Ego: 19 (#137),
@5: Sup: 45 (#247); Ego: 70 (#207),
@6: Sup: 55 (#302); Ego: 10 (#217),
@7: Sup: 12 (#314); Ego: 38 (#255),
Male: #314; Feme: #255 <-- *LITMUS* *TEST* *FOR* *PERJURY* UNDER
SECTION #314 TO CRIMES ACT OF VICTORIA 1958
} // #498

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; *I*
*AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #ONE: #99 / #297 AND TORAH PROTOTYPE
#THREE: #96 / #288

#498 as [#80, #30, #8, #100, #70, #10, #200] = pleroo (G4137): {#13 as
#1088 % #41 = #22} 1) to make full, to fill up, ie. to fill to the full;
2) to render full, ie. to complete; 1a) to cause to abound, to furnish
or supply liberally; 1a1) I abound, I am liberally supplied; 2a) to fill
to the top: so that nothing shall be wanting to full measure, fill to
the brim; 2b) to consummate: a number; 2b1) to make complete in every
particular, to render perfect; 2b2) to carry through to the end, to
accomplish, carry out, (some undertaking); 2c) to carry into effect,
bring to realisation, realise; 2c1) of matters of duty: to perform,
execute; 2c2) of sayings, promises, prophecies, to bring to pass,
ratify, accomplish; 2c3) *TO* *FULFIL*, ie. *TO* *CAUSE* *GOD'S* *WILL*
(*AS* *MADE* *KNOWN*
*IN* *THE* *LAW*) *TO* *BE* *OBEYED* *AS* *IT* *SHOULD* *BE*, and God's
promises (given through the prophets) to receive fulfilment

- dolf

A DRAFT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM
THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Metacognition.pdf>

Initial Post: 23 June 2018

#SAPIENT #JURISPRUDENCE #METACOGNITION #PROTOTYPES


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.