Combined Adelaide Hills Refugee Support Group's Annual BYO Picnic
kangarooistan
Time 27 November · 11:00 - 15:00
Location Central Mount Barker Park ~ Between Lake and Farmers Market -
see site pic below
Created by:
Inverbrackie Refugee Support Group, Oldman Kangarooistan
More info
Last Saturday in NOVEMBER for the Combined Refugee Support Group's BYO
Picnic to show support;
We WELCOME refugees in the Adelaide Hills and ALWAYS have.
If you like, you can wear or bring something purple.
...Purple is a colour often used regarding social justice issues and
has become a symbol for the Inverbrackie Refugee Support Group.
It's not a a march or a rally. It's a family day for people who wish
to show PEACEFUL SUPPORT to the refugees by enjoying a picnic in a
beautiful place.
A place where there are many people who understand the need to welcome
those people who have left their homes, their relatives and their
lives behind in fear of persecution.
It will not cost thousands in government/taxpayers money to run. The
picnic will be BYO, free to all, nil cost to taxpayers and not for
profit to the organizers.
Politicians who SUPPORT refugees are welcome to speak, but this is not
a debate or an opportunity to win votes.
ALL WELCOME - it's free! (see site pics here)
http://picasaweb.google.com/kangarooistan9/20101104#
Please use buses if you can, as parking may be limited.
Farmers Market and Hills Bakeries come highly recommended for picnic
lunch - yum!
Supporting local business is a good thing!
SO PLEASE come along and help to swell the numbers in a SHOW OF
PEACEFUL SUPPORT for the REFUGEES by enjoying a beautiful day in the
park.
~ Imagine All the People Living Life in Peace ~
WE THANK YOU so much for your interest and your support. ☺
MANY thanks also go to the Mount Barker District Council and their
STAFF for a wonderful job in creating this excellent picnic area.
.
More pics of the Annual picnic site
nnual Refugee supporters Picnic site pics
.http://picasaweb.google.com/kangarooistan9/20101110#
.
NOTE to group organizer ,
visit the site from Bus terminal along main street to library and
visit the Park at least once on a Saturday BEFORE the planned picnic
and inspect / do time study, so you can tell your members "where when
and how" best to enjoy YOUR groups Picnic Day.
.
Many Small Refugee Supportive Groups will be there on the
day.Hopefully one from EVERY town in the Adelaide Hills area
YOU must run your own Group Activity in any way YOU see fit , but
double the end result IF planned AND tested out on the Saturday before
by a small number of YOUR group members , Your " test run " need NOT
be at 11am to 3 pm on Saturday , a site visit can be done on ANY DAY
leading up to the MASSED GROUPS PICNIC DAY. BUT I encourage a visit to
the site by EVERYBODY planning to attend on 27th , before the day and
you WILL get twice the pleasure on the 27th if you KNOW your way AND
know where to park and know exactly how best to get from your car TOO
the picnic Site , and WHERE to find computer 15 to leave or pick up
messages or say Hello to the oldman BEFORE the Picnic day THEN we can
ALL enjoy a smooth planned tested days activities with better end
results for Refugees .
.
Oldman will be at computer 15 in Library every day at noon til 1 ,
.
AND EVERY Saturday leading up to 27th some where in the park on his
PURPLE electric scooter , doing test run for the "Peramangk Picnic
Days Activity" , between the Bus Depot , main street and the walking
trail between, say HELLO if ya can on the Saturdays before to confirm
your plans may prove helpful but not necessary.
.
You dont NEED anybodies Permission to use the PUBLIC park.
.
and the general public can and will use it too , naturally first in
best dressed but it IS a very BIG park , we will need to show respect
and Tolerance we are asking of others.
.
Plenty of room for ALL , but its BEST if we do try and coordinate
activities so we ALL enjoy the day to the MAX , its our ONLY yearly
reward , and relaxing fun day so do a test run its ALWAYS easier and
better if you have tested it out first ,
.
USE public transport if you can , excellent bus service see link here
http://www.timetables.adelaidemetro.com.au/ttsearch.php?action=search&searchtext=864&js=1
AND pic of main street from Bus depot to Library / park here.
HEREhttp://picasaweb.google.com/kangarooistan9/20
Kangaroo Court Australia
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39901741/Complaint-of-Unlawful-Discrimination-by-Australian-Judiciary
"Specific demands are:
1. Amending the Constitution.
2. Separation of powers.
3. Legislative democracy.
4. An independent judiciary.
5. Public control of public servants.
6. Guarantee of human rights.
7. Election of public officials.
8. Rural–urban equality.
9. Freedom of association.
10. Freedom of assembly.
11. Freedom of expression.
12. Freedom of religion.
13. Civic education.
14. Protection of private property.
15. Financial and tax reform.
16. Social security.
17. Protection of the environment.
18. A federated republic.
19. Truth in reconciliation."
LODGMENT OF COMPLAINT: Further Complaint of Unlawful Racial
Discrimination, Human Rights Violations, Genocide against the
Commonwealth and Australia Judiciary and High Court Australia
Director, Complaint Handling
Australian Human Rights Commission
GPO Box 5218
SYDNEY NSW 2001
RE: Complaint of Unlawful Racial Discrimination by the
Australian Judiciary (State and Federal) and High Court Australia, the
Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, the
Attorneys General (State and Federal), the Australian Human Rights
(and Equal Opportunity) Commission and the Australian Federal Police
Complaint of unlawful sex discrimination against the
Australian Judiciary
Complaint of breaches of Human Rights by the
aforementioned by the Commonwealth and its agencies
1. Further to the complaint on 1 October, 2010;
2. The Genocide Centre has received an email from Rebecca Gieng
presumably acting general supervisor, when the initial complaint
addressed the Director;
3. This document is taken to be lodgment of complaint, by the
Indigenous and Origines Genocide Centre; the Commission should have
courtesy to address its Director;
4. Ms Gieng indicated that “Commission can only terminate
complaints if they are lodged and accepted by the Commission”;
lodgment is taken to be a given;
5. The Genocide Centre would like to know where in the Human
Rights (and Equal Opportunity) Commission Act 1986, does it allow the
Human Rights Commission to “accept” or not accept a complaint;
6. If the Commission is too incompetent to deal with complaint,
then they should terminate the complaint immediately, so it can be
heard in the Federal Court;
7. Is it the intention of the Commission to pervert the Human
Rights Commission Act 1986?
8. This document covers unlawful racial and sex discrimination,
plus Human Rights violations by the Commonwealth and its judiciary;
both violations are related and essentially the same, both are covered
by ICCPR and ICERD, and protected under the Human Rights (and Equal
Opportunity) Commission Act 1986, RDA 1975, SDA 1992, inter alia;
9. In addition to the complaint, the question(s) to the
commission is simple: Can the Australian judiciary violate Australian
laws, including the Australian Constitution, international laws, ICERD
and ICCPR, inter alia, in exercise of “their judicial powers”;
10. Whether they are “seen to hold immunity” is irrelevant to whether
they are given immunity by any written laws;
11. Whether the Commonwealth and Attorneys General, including the
Federal, and Rob Hulls of Victoria, can use incompetent Human Rights
Commission and Court Registrars, including Rosemary Mussolino (High
Court), Joe Salemantico (sp? Victorian Supreme Court) to violate
ICCPR’s articles on access to courts and justice system;
12. In 2008 or thereabouts, the High Court Justice Michael Kirby did
opine that the High Court of Australia presided over by the Chief
Justice Robert French did make judicial decisions to deprive
Indigenous and Origines people access to the laws and courts based on
their “Aboriginality” [sic].
13. Justice Michael Kirby had written extensive United Nations papers
on judicial corruption.
14. In 2009, the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and
Constitutional Affairs deprived the Indigenous and Origines peoples,
and immigrants access to the Australian Constitution by refusing to
consider submissions to Inquiries regarding the access to law and the
role of judges;
15. The Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs
and its chairs Senators Barnett and Crossin, indicated that it was
lawful to defame the good name of Indigenous and Origines peoples, and
Immigrants without the right to reply through legal process, nor the
parliamentary process;
16. The Commonwealth has defamed the name of Indigenous and Origines
peoples, accusing them of actions and deeds that are valid and lawful
under their own laws and customs, without having made proper Treaty
arrangements;
17. The Commonwealth had deprived the Indigenous and Origines peoples
of access to the Commonwealth laws and courts by depriving them of the
Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), in full and unconditionally, in
comparison to other races;
18. The Commonwealth had deprived the Indigenous and Origines peoples
of access to International treaties ICERD and ICCPR, inter alia, in
comparison to other races;
19. The Commonwealth has engaged in Genocide against the Indigenous
and Origines peoples with the intention of wiping out their culture
and laws in part or in full; without having made proper Treaty
arrangements;
20. In M142/2007 Pham vs French & ors, Hayne J deprived Pham of
access to the law and courts by unlawfully modifying court papers and
content;
21. In VID91/2009, Middleton J opined that it was lawful for the
Commonwealth to disregard the Constitution, the Evidence Act, inter
alia, and for the Commonwealth and Judiciary to fabricate material
evidence and facts;
22. The President of the Human Rights (and Equal Opportunity)
Commission John von Doussa, another former federal court judge,
refused to terminate complaints of unlawful racial discrimination so
it can be heard in the Federal Courts, perverting the HREOCA 1986
(Cth) PO46; lodgement cannot be argued, and the Commission has no
power of non-acceptance;
23. The Australian Human Rights Commission continue to refuse to
terminate complaints so they can be heard in the Federal Court, and
continuing to pervert the Human Rights Act 1986;
24. In January 2010, a Commonwealth of Australia was put on Notice
regarding judicial corruption and perversion of justice: the Australia
Federal Police has refused to investigate judicial corruption by John
Handley (Administrative Appeals Tribunal), Paul Mentor (Sparke
Helmore), Tim de Uray (AGS), inter alia, for fabricating material
evidence and documents;
25. French, Hayne, Middleton, North, JJ, inter alia, indicated that
the sworn statements of the Australian man of Asian background was
less valid that hearsay evidence from the Commonwealth;
26. The Chief Justices High Court, Federal Court and AAT, continue to
re-run dishonorable justices include North J and Handley, without
regards for apprehended bias against immigrants, Indigenous and
Origines peoples, with the intention to pervert justice and the rule
of law; in conjunction with the Attorneys General, acting in bad
faith;
27. Gummow and Crennan JJ indicated that an Australian man of Asian
background cannot be properly heard in the High Court Australia, by
refusing oral representation;
28. The Queensland magistrate Michael O'Driscoll indicated that
calling someone “nigger and sandnigger”: "The words used were crude,
unattractive and direct but were not offensive to a reasonable
person,";
29. Christie Turner, 28, told Southport Magistrates Court she was
deeply offended when she read the one-page fax which called on the
Labor Party to tighten immigration laws against "niggers" and
"sandnigger terrorists" and Muslim women with circumcised genitals.
30. In other words, if you are a black person or woman, you are NOT
reasonable;
31. The Queensland magistrate Michael O'Driscoll may have been living
under his little rock, but “ignorance is not an excuse” for not
knowing civil rights in America where black people were lynched, nor
genocide of Indigenous and Origines people in Australia;
32. What the Mulheron case indicates is large open display of
unlawful racial discrimination right under the nose of the Australian
Human Rights Commission;
33. The Monash Legal Service in Melbourne has published reports of
Victorian Police targeting African Youth, right under the nose of the
Australian Human Rights Commission;
34. The Australian Judiciary refusing to answer questions of law by
PHAM and John Wilson; their refusal to answer questions of laws,
invalidates such laws;
35. The Australian Human Rights Commission is now asked to
investigate unlawful racial discrimination, sex discrimination and
human rights violation by the Commonwealth and the Australian
Judiciary, Federal and state police;
36. The Commission is now asked if there are exemptions in the ICERD
and ICCPR for the Commonwealth and/or Judiciary to continue violation
of International Laws and treaties, and their acts of genocide,
conspiracy to pervert justice, conspiracy to cause injury and death to
Indigenous and Origines peoples and other Australians.
Signed:
Charles PHAM
Friday, October 08, 2010
for
Indigenous & Origines Genocide Centre
Director: Robbie THORPE
Special Counsel: Charles PHAM
PO BOX 1007
Springvale
VIC 3171
=================================
Dear Charles
I refer to your recent email to the Commission.
You state that you have been discriminated against by various
organisations, including courts, the Attorney General, the Commission
and the Australian Federal Police.
I have read your email, but it is unclear what your allegations relate
to. If you feel that you have been discriminated against because of
your sex, age, race or disability, it is open for you to lodge a
complaint. Please note that the Commission can only terminate
complaints if they are lodged and accepted by the Commission.
I should also note however, that the Commission is limited in the
matters that we can consider against the Courts. The Commission's
complaint handling process does not extend to considering claims
against Judges or Magistrates when they are exercising their judicial
power as they are seen to hold immunity.
Should you have any further queries, please advise by return email.
Regards,
Rebecca Gieng
A/g Supervisor
Complaint Information Service
Australian Human Rights Commission
Level 8 Piccadilly Tower, 133 Castlereagh St, Sydney NSW 2000
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001
T 1300 656 419 F +61 2 9284 9611
E complaintsi...@humanrights.gov.au W www.humanrights.gov.au
Human rights: NOone, NOwhere, everyday
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39901741/Complaint-of-Unlawful-Discrimination-by-Australian-Judiciary
Kangaroo Court Australia
kangarooistan
Combined Adelaide Hills Refugee Support Group's Annual BYO Picnic
- see site pic below
jwshe...@satx.rr.com
Jihadwatch
Standing up for the rights of women will get you branded a racist and
a sexist these days. And while women in Australia are free to wear the
burqa, apparently Sergio Redegalli is not free, at least in the eyes
of many, to call on them not to wear it. Yet another Islamic challenge
to the freedom of expression: "Complaint lodged over burqa mural," by
Josephine Tovey for the Sydney Morning Herald, November 26 (thanks to
all who sent this in):
IT HAS become a lightning rod in the public debate about the right of
Muslim women to wear the burqa, attracting protests, the censure of a
mayor and messages of support from talkback radio.
But now the Newtown mural of a woman in a full-face Muslim covering
with a strike symbol over her face and the words ''Say No to the
Burqa'' is the subject of an anti-discrimination complaint.
Cigdem Aydemir, 27, a Muslim, artist and high-school art teacher, said
she felt ''completely offended and insulted'' when she saw the mural
pop up in her neighbourhood.
The work of a local artist, Sergio Redegalli, the piece adorns a wall
of his studio facing the street and the busy rail line.
''My sister-in-law wears a burqa ... my mother wears a veil,'' she
said. ''I wore a veil for 10 years of my life. I think everyone has
the right to wear whatever they want on their body and that kind of
diversity needs to be protected.''
Aydemir went to the police and then the council to try to make the
complaint, but as the mural was painted on private property neither
could intervene. She lodged her concerns with the Anti-Discrimination
Board, who this week notified Redegalli.
He said he had painted it to open debate about the burqa, but now felt
his right to freedom of expression was on the line.
''There's a problem about the right to free expression, the loss of
the ability to say something without instantly being branded a
racist,'' Redegalli said. He cited a number of reasons for his
opposition to the garment, including concerns about security and the
rise of Islamic extremism in Australia.
''There's thousands that can say we don't actually feel comfortable
about this - that's not being taken seriously,'' he said.
But Aydemir said: ''It's Islamophobic; it's feeding the racist and
sexist attitudes we have in our society.''
The image has drawn fire from locals, and has been defaced at least 20
times. The former Marrickville mayor, Sam Iskander, said in September
the mural ''goes against the values which the Marrickville community
has believed in and practised for generations''.
Like what? The equality of rights of women?
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/11/australia-muslims-complain-about-say-no-to-burqas-mural.html
kangarooistan
> AND pic of main street from Bus depot to Library / park here.
> HEREhttp://picasaweb.google.com/kangarooistan9/20
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/12/16/3094448.htm?site=news